Like I said Im checking

What does the sentence mean at the bottom with red on it? What does that mean?
Great, shoot first, question later?

To the best of my recollection that referred to the Charlottesville rally.

But if you give me thread tittle and post # I will give you a more definitive explanation.
 
Werbung:
Because wouldn’t you , like now, confront me on something to prove who and what you stayed as to why it pissed off another.
I have no idea what this means or refers to. Please rephrase.

I’m not condoning other’s words that they are right or wrong. I try my best not to degrade one… not saying I never have. Even a couple here I do not care for but I will or try not to lower myself to their level. I have been called many things by some but that’s on them.
It is true that you did not condone others words. But you condemned my words. And you did not condemn their many many vile insults against me when I merely asked them to provide evidence for their claims. You also defended them on almost all issues and not me on a single issue. You would also mostly not provide evidence for supporting others claims. But instead gave your unhelpful Schticks.

But answer this, have I ever insulted you personally?

I just do not think that you can honestly say that you do not feel that was a rally of some sort since you call Trump a nazi so another felt you put them in the same category.

For the nth time. I was not aware of the msg rally. I never commented on it. Why do you feel justified to continue this lie without having any evidence?

I mean you don’t agree with Trump’s actions do I guess you are just in love with all that voted for Trump! Trump’s words have been twisted and modified by the media and many have believed it. But honestly, many voted for Trump and will NEVER admit. And a novel of an excuse with be words can’t convince some just so. So if I am meddling, so be it. I guess I don’t belong here and just because I agree with someone does not mean I’m taking sides. This is not kindergarten as one stated.
I do not follow what you are trying to say above. Please rephrase.

You belong here. I like you. I welcome you engaging with me. However, you came in after days I asking two posters to prove their claims and them refusing to do so but instead keep insulting me and you went all in agreeing with them without providing the evidence that I have been asking. You provided some excerpts that accomplished nothing and were irrelevant wrt to proving their claims. This gave those two a certain cover. I say your meddling was extremely unfair. It was team playing of the lowest kind.
 
Here is a simple idea. I have not been shy re expressing my views. Why not attack my views on issues instead of attacking me personally? Why take side between posters? Why make personal comments or attacks? If you think I have said all trump supporters are nazis (I don’t think even trump is a nazi) why not confront me with my quotes? Or why not directly ask me if I think all trump supporters are nazis? Why, you are afraid of my answer? Afraid that you would lose your bogus narrative?
 
Here is a simple idea. I have not been shy re expressing my views. Why not attack my views on issues instead of attacking me personally? Why take side between posters? Why make personal comments or attacks? If you think I have said all trump supporters are nazis (I don’t think even trump is a nazi) why not confront me with my quotes? Or why not directly ask me if I think all trump supporters are nazis? Why, you are afraid of my answer? Afraid that you would lose your bogus narrative?
Dastardly and misrepresented thread title!

If your lips are attached to trumps fat and stinky ass, you are likely to misrepresent all the time just to appease this narcissist garbage of a human being. Also if you are fed from the fat ass, you are likely to regurgitate excrements all the time. thats the lying thing for you!

This is why meat head .
 
Great, shoot first, question later?

To the best of my recollection that referred to the Charlottesville rally.

But if you give me thread tittle and post # I will give you a more definitive explanation.

Great, shoot first, question later?

To the best of my recollection that referred to the Charlottesville rally.

But if you give me thread tittle and post # I will give you a more definitive explanation.
 
That’s not a great help. Ok, you gave the thread title. Any post number? Thanks.
The post number is on the attachments I posted already. You are not reading them. So you might want to read the whole thread.
 
I’m sure I said thread AND post number. There are 30 pages. You had my post and took a snapshot. Why not give me the post number?
It’s on the snap shot.. #352 But if read the whole thread which you will not, it would all make sense. I have been called dumb here, uneducated etc… and they don’t know me as I do not know others. I guess I see some being harsher but who am I to judge.
 
I did not see Charlottesville. I could have over looked.
Did you see msg? :)

Let me first ask you a question: have I ever lied to you? Have you ever caught me in lying? I am telling you I was not aware of the msg rally. That reference was to Charlottesville. Furthermore, consider this:

He did engage in the Nazi rally. There are plenty of coverage on that.

Note the second sentence? I KNOW I must have been talking about the Charlottesville rally since it was heavily covered and since I was not even aware of the msg rally. And as you know and as the other poster claims I have referred to the Charlottesville rally dozens of times.

Why don’t you believe me when I say I never made a comment about the msg rally?Have I ever lied to you?
 
It’s on the snap shot.. #352 But if read the whole thread which you will not, it would all make sense. I have been called dumb here, uneducated etc… and they don’t know me as I do not know others. I guess I see some being harsher but who am I to judge.
This is vague. “It would all make sense” is vague. Do you agree with me now?
 
Werbung:
Back
Top