Liberals at it again inn Chicago what will it add up to by tomorrow end

[mark francis]

A few cases don't prove widespread fraud lol
You are beyond stuoid

Liars claim no Democrat voter fraud occurred but if Democrat crooks got caught committing voter fraud, then they were the only ones who ever did commit the crime, except for Republicans who committed voter fraud regularly.

 

[pjmret]

Liars claim no Democrat voter fraud occurred but if Democrat crooks got caught committing voter fraud, then they were the only ones who ever did commit the crime, except for Republicans who committed voter fraud regularly.

of course it would be a lie to say that literally no voter fraud occured. I don't know anyone who actually says that.
name someone who did, *****.

but you won't
because you're a *****

 

[mark francis]

of course it would be a lie to say that literally no voter fraud occured. I don't know anyone who actually says that.
name someone who did, *****.

but you won't
because you're a *****

In your honest opinion, what percentage of the treasonous crooks who committed voter fraud in 2020 got caught? 100%? 50%? .0001%?

 

[pjmret]

In your honest opinion, what percentage of the treasonous crooks who committed voter fraud in 2020 got caught? 100%? 50%? .0001%?

no idea, its such a small number that its hard to say. But year after year its a small number, so the percentage could vary widely. of course its not 100% since not every crook is caught.

there is no evidence of MASSIVE fraud which is the obvious point here.

 

[mark francis]

no idea, its such a small number that its hard to say. But year after year its a small number, so the percentage could vary widely. of course its not 100% since not every crook is caught.

there is no evidence of MASSIVE fraud which is the obvious point here.

You claim the percentage of voting fraud crooks who get caught is small, but you have no proof to back up that opinion.

 

[pjmret]

You claim the percentage of voting fraud crooks who get caught is small, but you have no proof to back up that opinion.

i said the NUMBER of fraud cases is small.
its true I can't prove it, but historically that's the number.

of course, the issue here is that YOU are claiming MASSIVE fraud and a STOLEN election, and have no proof.

i'm not the ***** who thinks the election was fraudulant

 

[pjmret]

Studies Agree: Impersonation Fraud by Voters Very Rarely Happens The Brennan Center’s seminal report on this issue, The Truth About Voter Fraud, found that mostreported incidents of voter fraud are actually traceable to other sources, such as clerical errors orbad data matching practices. The report reviewed elections that had been meticulously studied forvoter fraud, and found incident rates between 0.0003 percent and 0.0025 percent. Given this tinyincident rate for voter impersonation fraud, it is more likely, the report noted, that an American“will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.” A study published by a Columbia University political scientist tracked incidence rates for voterfraud for two years, and found that the rare fraud that was reported generally could be traced to“false claims by the loser of a close race, mischief and administrative or voter error.”

 

[mark francis]

i said the NUMBER of fraud cases is small.
its true I can't prove it, but historically that's the number.

You still claim the number of crooks who commit voting fraud is small but you admit you cannot prove that opinion.

of course, the issue here is that YOU are claiming MASSIVE fraud and a STOLEN election, and have no proof.

i'm not the ***** who thinks the election was fraudulant

 

[mark francis]

Studies Agree: Impersonation Fraud by Voters Very Rarely Happens The Brennan Center’s seminal report on this issue, The Truth About Voter Fraud, found that mostreported incidents of voter fraud are actually traceable to other sources, such as clerical errors orbad data matching practices. The report reviewed elections that had been meticulously studied forvoter fraud, and found incident rates between 0.0003 percent and 0.0025 percent. Given this tinyincident rate for voter impersonation fraud, it is more likely, the report noted, that an American“will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.” A study published by a Columbia University political scientist tracked incidence rates for voterfraud for two years, and found that the rare fraud that was reported generally could be traced to“false claims by the loser of a close race, mischief and administrative or voter error.”

Of course the leftist Brennan Center will support lying leftist denials of the Democrat theft of the 2020 election by fraud. Can anyone doubt that?

 

[pjmret]

Of course the leftist Brennan Center will support lying leftist denials of the Democrat theft of the 2020 election by fraud. Can anyone doubt that?

all you morons need is credible proof of fraud
which you don't have
which is why you lost every court case.

can anyone doubt you are a *****?

 

[pjmret]

You still claim the number of crooks who commit voting fraud is small but you admit you cannot prove that opinion.

true but every study backs up my claim.
and every state too.
and i'm not the ***** claiming the election was stolen. you are.
and i'm not the ***** who lost every court case. you are
your claim, your proof.

 

[mark francis]

all you morons need is credible proof of fraud
which you don't have
which is why you lost every court case.

can anyone doubt you are a *****?

Democrats cannot possibly prove they did not corrupt their voting machines but they continue to insist Americans blindly believe their claims of election innocence and purity without proof.

 

[mark francis]

true but every study backs up my claim.
and every state too.
and i'm not the ***** claiming the election was stolen. you are.
and i'm not the ***** who lost every court case. you are
your claim, your proof.

You can believe everyone agrees with you if you like, especially since you also believe there was little voter fraud in 2020. You are wrong but I am convinced you cannot see that.

 

[pjmret]

You can believe everyone agrees with you if you like, especially since you also believe there was little voter fraud in 2020. You are wrong but I am convinced you cannot see that.

the states do agree with me, they are on record as certified elections, *****.
same with the judges. lol

i am convinced you can't proide any credible evidence to prove the fraud.
because you have failed every time. lol

 

[mark francis]

the states do agree with me, they are on record as certified elections, *****.
same with the judges. lol

i am convinced you can't proide any credible evidence to prove the fraud.
because you have failed every time. lol

The mountain of evidence of 2020 voting fraud is huge, but the irrefutable proof is all but impossible to produce because of the failed opportunities to examine the voting machines and operations in a timely manner. Furthermore, examining every ballot for legitimacy is a task that may always be impossible to undertake because of the massive time and money that would have to be spent in such investigations.