Liberals at it again inn Chicago what will it add up to by tomorrow end

you believe the guy who confused mI and mn? lol

you're just as stupid as he is

michigan republicans ignored his "facts" also becuase he was a *****
I see you still cannot explain why 2020 data was illegally deleted from the security logs.
 
Werbung:
States certified the election without bothering to investigate why hundreds of thousands of ballots for Biden mysteriously appeared in the dead of night to democrat precincts without any required security verifications.
they didn't mysteriously appear.
nothing to investigate *****.
I see you still cannot explain why 2020 data was illegally deleted from the security logs.
what security logs exactly? what state? point to a credible proof of these logs being erased.
 
States certified the election without bothering to investigate why hundreds of thousands of ballots for Biden mysteriously appeared in the dead of night to democrat precincts without any required security verifications of legitimacy.
because they didn't *****.
nothing mysterious about ballots being counted overnight.
its how states work.

my god you're a *****
 
Trump’s original certified vote total in the county was 9,748 votes; the recount found he’d received 9,759 votes.

President-Elect Joe Biden’s original certified vote total was 5,960; the recount found Biden received one less vote, or 5,959.

lol. hand count of all ballots shows there was no fraud, noron
Recounting fake ballots does not make illegal ballots legal.

https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/appelEtal20.pdf

Most voters do not review BMD-printed ballots, and those who do often fail to notice when the printed vote is not what they expressed on the touchscreen. Furthermore, there is no action a voter can take to demonstrate to election officials that a BMD altered their expressed votes, nor is there a corrective action that election officials can take if notified by voters—there is no way to deter, contain, or correct computer hacking in BMDs. These are the essential security flaws of BMDs. Risk-limiting audits can assure that the votes recorded on paper ballots are tabulated correctly, but no audit can assure that the votes on paper are the ones expressed by the voter on a touchscreen: Elections conducted on current BMDs cannot be confirmed by audits.
 
Mr. Ramsland’s central conclusion is that “the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemicfraud and influence election results” (¶B.2). His reasoning is that the systemintentionally generates many errors while scanning ballots in order to cause theimages of the ballots to be reviewed by an EMS operator, a process known as“adjudication” during which the votes can be manually edited (¶B.12). This provides an opportunity, Mr. Ramsland believes, for a malicious operator to changevotes without being detected. Citing his forensic examination, Mr. Ramslandclaims that a “staggering number of votes [in Antrim] required adjudication”(¶B.12), and that “all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle aremissing” and must “have been manually removed” (¶B.15).There are several problems with this theory. First, adjudication occurs afterballots are scanned and poll tapes are printed. In Antrim County, the finalreported results match the poll tapes in essentially all cases. Therefore, the finalresults could not have been altered using adjudication.Second, Mr. Ramsland mischaracterizes the adjudication process. Dominion’sadjudication system produces detailed logs, which are recorded in the EMS together with the ballot scan and the scanner’s original interpretation, as illustratedin Figure 9. Far from being an ideal way to cheat without possibility of detection,adjudication creates abundant digital evidenceThird, and fatally, adjudication functionality was not enabled at all in AntrimCounty during the November 2020 election. The adjudication software applicationis an optional component of Democracy Suite. Antrim did not purchase it, andmy examination of the EMS shows that it was not installed. There are no adjudication logs for the simple reason that adjudication was not used. Moreover, thetabulators were not configured to store ballot images—a necessary preconditionfor adjudication—and my inspection of the memory cards confirms that no ballotimages are present. This means that it would have been impossible to use theadjudication feature even if the software were somehow installed after the election.Far from a “staggering number” of ballots being adjudicated, the actual numberwas zero. Therefore, Mr. Ra


there are no such logs because they didn't use that feature.
The machines did have security logs from before and after the 2020 election, putting fraud deniers in a pickle. How or why were the existing logs still on the machines with only the data from the 2020 election missing? Furthermore, if fraud deniers claim the security logs were not used in the 2020 election to offer election security then who decided to omit election security from the 2020 election alone, and why?

 
The machines did have security logs from before and after the 2020 election, putting fraud deniers in a pickle. How or why were the existing logs still on the machines with only the data from the 2020 election missing? Furthermore, if fraud deniers claim the security logs were not used in the 2020 election to offer election security then who decided to omit election security from the 2020 election alone, and why?
It didn't have adulation logs in 2020 because the feature wasn't used *****
 
ramsland is a *****. confused MI and MN, and wnhined about a log missing for a feature that wasn't used.

god he's a true *****.

and so are you for mindlessly believing him without doing simple research which would have shown how stupid he is. lol
If so then why was the security feature that was used and preserved on the machines from other elections not used to provide election security for voters in the 2020 election?
 
To point out the supposed problems with Dominion Voting Systems in Georgia, the affidavit, filed as analysis from Texas resident and cybersecurity expert Russell Ramsland, was intended to show supposed errors in Michigan, as both states use Dominion Voting Systems to tabulate election results.

However, the Ramsland affidavit appeared to confuse townships in Minnesota for Michigan


ramsland is a ***** and so are you. lol
At least the forensics stumped Democrat fraud deniers by pointing out they erased data on their security logs.
 
Recounting fake ballots does not make illegal ballots legal.

https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/appelEtal20.pdf

Most voters do not review BMD-printed ballots, and those who do often fail to notice when the printed vote is not what they expressed on the touchscreen. Furthermore, there is no action a voter can take to demonstrate to election officials that a BMD altered their expressed votes, nor is there a corrective action that election officials can take if notified by voters—there is no way to deter, contain, or correct computer hacking in BMDs. These are the essential security flaws of BMDs. Risk-limiting audits can assure that the votes recorded on paper ballots are tabulated correctly, but no audit can assure that the votes on paper are the ones expressed by the voter on a touchscreen: Elections conducted on current BMDs cannot be confirmed by audits.
Present any credible evidence this was a problem *****
 
If so then why was the security feature that was used and preserved on the machines from other elections not used to provide election security for voters in the 2020 election?
What security feature exactly *****

They had the standard logs it's where the ***** got his 68 percent from duh
 
it wasn't erased it never existed *****. because they don't use adjudication. duh

god you're stupid lol
It is easy to see why Democrats did not want to admit that they used the shady adjudication process that Democrats made excessive use of in other states.

Microsoft Word - Antrim Michigan Forensics Report 121320(9).docx (depernolaw.com)

2. We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
 
Werbung:
It is easy to see why Democrats did not want to admit that they used the shady adjudication process that Democrats made excessive use of in other states.

Microsoft Word - Antrim Michigan Forensics Report 121320(9).docx (depernolaw.com)

2. We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
Nope the 68 percent errors was wrong he was too stupid to understand the log file
And they don't even use adjudication
Ramsland is a *****

I have already debunked this
Why do you enjoy looking stupid

Again adjudication was not even used ***** lol

Third, and fatally, adjudication functionality was not enabled at all in Antrim
County during the November 2020 election. The adjudication software application
is an optional component of Democracy Suite. Antrim did not purchase it, and
my examination of the EMS shows that it was not installed. There are no adjudi￾cation logs for the simple reason that adjudication was not
 
Back
Top