Liberals at it again inn Chicago what will it add up to by tomorrow end

Werbung:
Nope those claiming fraud need to prove itduh
What's to prove? That recounting bad ballots proved all ballots were legitimate? No, recounting bad ballots does not make bad ballots legitimate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...036d74-2017-11ea-bed5-880264cc91a9_story.html

As Georgia rolls out new voting machines for 2020, worries about election security persist

Some touch screens flipped voters’ selections from one party to the other, and ballots would “self-cast,” among other issues, according to dozens of affidavits submitted by voters in various state and federal court cases.

But election security experts said the state’s newest voting machines also remain vulnerable to potential intrusions or malfunctions — and some view the paper records they produce as insufficient if a verified audit of the vote is needed.

The concerns in Georgia come as paperless machines are set to be used in parts of at least half a dozen states in 2020 — a practice that leading experts and government officials warn is risky.

In a declaration filed in the federal case, Andrew Appel, a professor of computer science at Princeton University, said the ballot-marking devices — like any computer — can still be hacked.

“If hacked, they can systematically change votes from what the voter indicated on the touch screen when printed on the paper ballot; few voters will notice, and those that notice have only the mitigation that they might be able to correct their own ballots, not their neighbors; and finally, recounts or audits will see only the fraudulently marked paper,” he wrote.
 
Trumps dhsand doj
50 states
60 judges
All rejected the massive fraud stupidity

Sadly millions of right wing morons like Mark insist on being morons and believing the stupidity
No intelligent and informed American believes voting systems are not vulnerable to voting fraud. If evidence seems to indicate fraud then there is no defense against claims of fraud except debunking the claims with evidence, not opinions and assumptions.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/07/19/2018_flashback_democrats_talk_about_election_fraud_hacked_voting_machines_switching_votes.html#!

But here we are again, reflecting on the “impossible” voting machine vulnerability that Democrats once touted as a possibility — a reality, even.

Take a look at this damning video tweet from activist Jack Posobiec that compiles opinions from various Democratic officials who once preached the possibility of hacked voting machines.

“I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable,” Rep. Adam Schiff of California said.

“The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101,” Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden argued later in the clip, “directing that you install remote access software which would make a thing like that — you know — a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.”

Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar — who was also among the slew of Democrats eager to become the party’s 2020 nominee — also joined in on the “conspiracy.”

“You could easily hack into [voting machines]. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but, in fact, three companies are controlling [elections].”

The real kicker is then-Sen. Kamala Harris’ repeated appearances throughout the video.

It’s incredibly ironic considering the contention surrounding her assumed role as “second in command.”

“There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right? Which are vulnerable to being hacked,” Harris said in one segment.

“I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol where we brought in folks who — before our eyes — hacked election machines, those that are being used in many states,” she added in a separate piece.
 
Yeah sure. Another delusional hate filled rant.

How's Trump going now with his indictment?
You'll soon have to admit he's a traitorous fraud.
Trump is still popular with voters in spite of everything the crooked Democrats have done thus far. They falsely accused him of colluding with Russians. They falsely accused him of trying to force Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Biden crime family. They falsely accused him of complicity in murder when a protester was killed in Charlottesville. They falsely accused him of inciting violence on Jan 6. They falsely accused him of not working with officials to sort out documents they thought he should not have kept, including damning info on Hillary's involvement in the fake Russian conspiracy theory she invented, and so forth.
 
Trump is still popular with voters in spite of everything the crooked Democrats have done thus far. They falsely accused him of colluding with Russians. They falsely accused him of trying to force Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Biden crime family. They falsely accused him of complicity in murder when a protester was killed in Charlottesville. They falsely accused him of inciting violence on Jan 6. They falsely accused him of not working with officials to sort out documents they thought he should not have kept, including damning info on Hillary's involvement in the fake Russian conspiracy theory she invented, and so forth.
Donald Trump: 36 percent favorable, 58 percent unfavorable, 2 percent haven't heard enough about him;

lol. popular with republicans anyway.
intelligent people know he's a disgusting human who should be in jail.

 
No intelligent and informed American believes voting systems are not vulnerable to voting fraud. If evidence seems to indicate fraud then there is no defense against claims of fraud except debunking the claims with evidence, not opinions and assumptions.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/07/19/2018_flashback_democrats_talk_about_election_fraud_hacked_voting_machines_switching_votes.html#!

But here we are again, reflecting on the “impossible” voting machine vulnerability that Democrats once touted as a possibility — a reality, even.

Take a look at this damning video tweet from activist Jack Posobiec that compiles opinions from various Democratic officials who once preached the possibility of hacked voting machines.

“I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable,” Rep. Adam Schiff of California said.

“The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101,” Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden argued later in the clip, “directing that you install remote access software which would make a thing like that — you know — a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.”

Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar — who was also among the slew of Democrats eager to become the party’s 2020 nominee — also joined in on the “conspiracy.”

“You could easily hack into [voting machines]. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but, in fact, three companies are controlling [elections].”

The real kicker is then-Sen. Kamala Harris’ repeated appearances throughout the video.

It’s incredibly ironic considering the contention surrounding her assumed role as “second in command.”

“There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right? Which are vulnerable to being hacked,” Harris said in one segment.

“I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol where we brought in folks who — before our eyes — hacked election machines, those that are being used in many states,” she added in a separate piece.


possibility? sure.

no evidence it happened, *****. lol.

god yoyu're stupid
 
What's to prove? That recounting bad ballots proved all ballots were legitimate? No, recounting bad ballots does not make bad ballots legitimate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...036d74-2017-11ea-bed5-880264cc91a9_story.html

As Georgia rolls out new voting machines for 2020, worries about election security persist

Some touch screens flipped voters’ selections from one party to the other, and ballots would “self-cast,” among other issues, according to dozens of affidavits submitted by voters in various state and federal court cases.

But election security experts said the state’s newest voting machines also remain vulnerable to potential intrusions or malfunctions — and some view the paper records they produce as insufficient if a verified audit of the vote is needed.

The concerns in Georgia come as paperless machines are set to be used in parts of at least half a dozen states in 2020 — a practice that leading experts and government officials warn is risky.

In a declaration filed in the federal case, Andrew Appel, a professor of computer science at Princeton University, said the ballot-marking devices — like any computer — can still be hacked.

“If hacked, they can systematically change votes from what the voter indicated on the touch screen when printed on the paper ballot; few voters will notice, and those that notice have only the mitigation that they might be able to correct their own ballots, not their neighbors; and finally, recounts or audits will see only the fraudulently marked paper,” he wrote.

what's to prove? you know, fraud. lol.
which you morons failed at

god you're stupid.
 
Democrats used the pandemic as an excuse to eliminate voting securities, paving the way for the largest level of voting fraud in US history.

all you morons need is credible proof of "largest level".
which you failed at
which is why trumps dhs and doj disagreed with you, all 50 states certified their votes, and you morons lost every court case.

hahahahahah
 
the funny thing about that "trailerload of completed fake ballots"..not a single picture of anything. not a bit of proof. why is that, *****? lol.
its almost as if a lying drug-addicted *****...invented the whole story.

hahahhahahahah

and of course if I was going to commit a crime like printing fraudulant ballots, my first choice would be to cross state lines to do so, and have them shipped by the post office. /s

lol
 
Donald Trump: 36 percent favorable, 58 percent unfavorable, 2 percent haven't heard enough about him;

lol. popular with republicans anyway.
intelligent people know he's a disgusting human who should be in jail.

God will judge the wicked for their wickedness. I suspect all the hatred and venom against Trump is inspired by evil influence, not godly influence.
 
God will judge the wicked for their wickedness. I suspect all the hatred and venom against Trump is inspired by evil influence, not godly influence.
Tells us all the qualities of Trump that show he is someone to like personally. I dare you lol

Is it his name calling? Lying? Immature behavior? Hahahaha
 
God will judge the wicked for their wickedness. I suspect all the hatred and venom against Trump is inspired by evil influence, not godly influence.
Based on his behavior Christian should really dislike him but as always right wing christians are fake hypocrite christians
 
God will judge the wicked for their wickedness. I suspect all the hatred and venom against Trump is inspired by evil influence, not godly influence.
Maybe you can post some Bible verses showing how trump is acting just like Jesus would
 
Werbung:
you posted a link to the antrim michigan "analysis" done by russell ramsland of ASOG as if it meant anything. lol
he's a *****.

he got "michigan" and "minnesota" confused when he claimed more people voted than registered. lol.
i mean..how stupid can you be for a "consultant"? hahahahah

Rudy Giuliani cites affidavit about Michigan that erroneously includes Minnesota locations​


"There were at least 19 precincts where the Presidential Votes Cast compared to the Estimated Voters based on Reported Statistics exceeded 100%," the affidavit reads. The document then goes on to list the 19 precincts, shown in this screenshot:

But there’s a problem, and it’s a big one: All 19 of the precincts cited in the affidavit are actually in Minnesota, not Michigan.



I understand 10 year olds confusing states, but this is from your "expert" hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhah
but..but..it was an "affidavit". hahahahahha as if that means anything.

you right wing morons are so stupid.
 
Back
Top