35? Wow. That will swing an election any time.You only prove your ignorance of the facts by denying the fraud that occurred.
35 voter fraud cases in Georgia turned over for prosecution (yahoo.com)
The Albany Herald, Ga.
February 15, 2021·2 min read
Feb. 15—ATLANTA — The State Election Board has referred 35 cases of election-law violations to the attorney general or local district attorneys for criminal prosecution.
Prove it ***** duhThe ballots that were delivered by the whistleblower truck driver were not blank ballots but were completed mail-in ballots inside return self- address-stamped envelopes.
Go away you silly man.Democrats always make excuses for the 'mistakes' uncovered in their election operations, but they fail to adequately refute the evidence of fraud. Did officials certify ballots that were clearly unverified or illegal? Absolutely, even though they and their apologists dishonestly claim they did not.
43,000 Absentee Ballot Votes Counted In DeKalb County 2020 Election Violated Chain Of Custody Rule (georgiarecord.com)
43,000 Absentee Ballot Votes Counted In DeKalb County 2020 Election Violated Chain Of Custody Rule
43,907 of the 61,731 absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes in the November 2020 presidential election in DeKalb County, Georgia–72 percent–were counted in official tallies certified by the county and the state, despite violating chain of custody requirements set forward in Georgia Emergency Rule 183-1-14-1.8-.14 promulgated by the Georgia State Election Board at its July 1, 2020, meeting.
Prove it lying ***** lo.The ballots that were delivered by the whistleblower truck driver were not blank ballots but were completed mail-in ballots inside return self- address-stamped envelopes.
You can't prove that because you are a lying fake christian lolThe ballots that were delivered by the whistleblower truck driver were not blank ballots but were completed mail-in ballots inside return self- address-stamped envelopes.
Ballots lacking the required security verifications are supposed to be rejected, but ballots that had no signature verification or chain of custody documentation were eagerly counted and certified by Trump-hating election workers and their co-conspirators.actually when mistakes are made or things don't go smoothly, generally it is NOT "illegal" to count them. you don't invalidate valid ballots because mistakes were made or people are busy. For example, taking a day to transport ballots when the law says "immediately", you wouldn't invalidate them. What does "immediately" mean in a busy election? if you are busy enough, "immediately" could well be a day lol.
you only invalidate ballots if they aren't valid. Otherwise, for example, election workers could just hang onto ballots they don't like and then throw them away because they weren't handled "immediately". no one would give that kind of power to election workers. duh.
god you're stupid. lol
If things do not go smoothly you do not claim the troubled election was one of the most secure and accurate in history.right wing ***** "logic": "if things don't go perfectly, you must throw out ballots and declare fraud" lol.
clue for the clueless - elections never go perfectly. Things don't go smoothly. Its a busy, hectic time. mistakes are made, things are delayed, etc, etc. that's how EVERY election is.
just because "your guy" lost, its not fraud. Trump was one of the most hated people in the world, and you are surprised he lost?
hahahahahahha
Prove they did not have the required docs *****Ballots lacking the required security verifications are supposed to be rejected, but ballots that had no signature verification or chain of custody documentation were eagerly counted and certified by Trump-hating election workers and their co-conspirators.
Overall things went great *****If things do not go smoothly you do not claim the troubled election was one of the most secure and accurate in history.
Ballots lacking verification requirements are invalid, regardless of what the corrupt or ignorant may claim otherwise.Just to ge clear violations of election processes by election workers do not invalidate valid ballots *****
That should be obvious to anyone with an iq over 50 duh
Prove they lacked them lying ***** lolBallots lacking verification requirements are invalid, regardless of what the corrupt or ignorant may claim otherwise.
Disproving evidence of fraud is something Democrats claim they do not have to do since they expect all Americans to blindly accept their unsupported claims without question.Possibility? Sure *****. Anything is possible. Duh
Shame there is no credible evidence of it lol
"Proving the possibility" is meaningless and stupid like you
You can't prove your claims about fraud because you are a lying ***** lolDisproving evidence of fraud is something Democrats claim they do not have to do since they expect all Americans to blindly accept their unsupported claims without question.