Leftist Racism & Indoctrination

You never hear of 'frozen violence'? People remember haw their ancestors were enslaved and murdered, especially when the ancestors of the criminals never stop racist ranting, which seems to be true of a very high proportion of extreme-right Americans. What does anyone owe them? A lynching perhaps?

high proportion ? seriously ?

and how can anyone remember the experiences of a family member generations back ? I know a few stories from generations past the ancestors I knew personally but that hardly = remerberence.
 
Werbung:
high proportion ? seriously ?

and how can anyone remember the experiences of a family member generations back ? I know a few stories from generations past the ancestors I knew personally but that hardly = remerberence.

You can remember with great ease. It is criminals who need to forget, as you may perhaps remember.
 
You never hear of 'frozen violence'? People remember haw their ancestors were enslaved and murdered, especially when the ancestors of the criminals never stop racist ranting, which seems to be true of a very high proportion of extreme-right Americans. What does anyone owe them? A lynching perhaps?

Your "logic" is insane. Racism today in the USA is 90% a Black issue, not White! You argue that because SOME whites oppressed blacks in the past, blacks have a right to inflict violence on ALL whites today. In the case of Whites, our MEMORIES of black violence are clear. This violence didn't happen 100 years or more ago. It is happening TODAY! Perhaps we should apply your "logic" to the epidemic violence that SOME blacks have been committing against whites. Your flawed "logic" implies that whites should have a right to return the violence against ALL blacks. Such a pathetically ignorant opinion is dangerous, and leads to incite racial violence, rather than helping race-relations.
 
You never hear of 'frozen violence'? People remember haw their ancestors were enslaved and murdered, especially when the ancestors of the criminals never stop racist ranting, which seems to be true of a very high proportion of extreme-right Americans. What does anyone owe them? A lynching perhaps?


There is little 'racist rating' anywhere in America, but facts are of little interest to your kind.

The real racism in America comes predominantly from those on the left, who keep blacks impoverished with welfare, while promoting unseen racism as an excuse for failure, zealously promoting abortion for black babies, and lastly the leftist controlled p-schools have failed generations of black children....but all this, no doubt, is news to you.

And do you fail to see the hypocrisy of your beliefs? ....rhetorical question....you are blind to your ignorance....You advocate murder for some today, to avenge murder done centuries ago. You are no better than those who committed lynchings...which by the way, were few...probably another fact unknown to you.
 
Your "logic" is insane. Racism today in the USA is 90% a Black issue, not White! You argue that because SOME whites oppressed blacks in the past, blacks have a right to inflict violence on ALL whites today. In the case of Whites, our MEMORIES of black violence are clear. This violence didn't happen 100 years or more ago. It is happening TODAY! Perhaps we should apply your "logic" to the epidemic violence that SOME blacks have been committing against whites. Your flawed "logic" implies that whites should have a right to return the violence against ALL blacks. Such a pathetically ignorant opinion is dangerous, and leads to incite racial violence, rather than helping race-relations.
NO WHITES ALLOWED: In an elementary school in Detroit white students were not allowed to go on a field trip with the black students. The reason? Ummmm..... because racism against whites is state-sanctioned now, (consider affirmative action) kinda like how racism against the Jews was state sanctioned in Germany, or how racism against blacks used to be state sanctioned during segregation. Reverse racism is racism against whites, and for some reason it's OK now and not considered racist.

CINCO DE MAYO TRUMPS FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PATRIOTISM: Students in California were sent home and given unexcused absences for showing up at school wearing American flag colors on Cinco de Mayo. Hispanic students considered it to be disrespectful to wear the colors of the American flag in America on a holiday that's not actually a national holiday in either Mexico or the US. So in America now it's considered un-American to be a patriot because it might hurt other countries' feelings to wear patriot colors on their semi-holidays, I guess. Wearing red white and blue must be racist against the Mexican-Americans, because, you know, the American flag is not for them or something.... Huh?

awhile back, Al Sharpton is in Arizona stirring up race riots in which people are calling the governor a racist Nazi in the name of supporting the Hispanics because a law that doesn't profile and treats all races of illegal immigrants the same is racist.

Does anybody else think we've lost our friggin' minds? How long are we going to sanction racism against one race?
 
Your "logic" is insane. Racism today in the USA is 90% a Black issue, not White! You argue that because SOME whites oppressed blacks in the past, blacks have a right to inflict violence on ALL whites today. In the case of Whites, our MEMORIES of black violence are clear. This violence didn't happen 100 years or more ago. It is happening TODAY! Perhaps we should apply your "logic" to the epidemic violence that SOME blacks have been committing against whites. Your flawed "logic" implies that whites should have a right to return the violence against ALL blacks. Such a pathetically ignorant opinion is dangerous, and leads to incite racial violence, rather than helping race-relations.

You went there to get rich, and you did it through robbery of the native people and enslavement of the black ones. You owe a million years in Purgatory, as you know, and a vast sum in reparations here. Come off the crap, do!
 
You went there to get rich, and you did it through robbery of the native people and enslavement of the black ones. You owe a million years in Purgatory, as you know, and a vast sum in reparations here. Come off the crap, do!

if by "you" you mean europeans then right you are. just another facet of colonialism. if you want reparations then take it up with those involved. on your side of the Atlantic.
 
Till we made the shitbags stop it, by popular pressure, since slavery was illegal here. You fought a war and stayed racist. Half a cheer.

yes the rest of the world saw the end if the skave trade coming and wound it down by facilitating the accounting (asset deprecuation). Mr Lincoln chose to kill off hundreds of thousnds of peopleand 40% of the economy while it was near bloodless everywhere else.

what a guy...
 
Till we made the shitbags stop it, by popular pressure, since slavery was illegal here. You fought a war and stayed racist. Half a cheer.

yes the rest of the world saw the end if the skave trade coming and wound it down by facilitating the accounting (asset deprecuation). Mr Lincoln chose to kill off hundreds of thousnds of peopleand 40% of the economy while it was near bloodless everywhere else.

what a guy...
 
You went there to get rich, and you did it through robbery of the native people and enslavement of the black ones. You owe a million years in Purgatory, as you know, and a vast sum in reparations here. Come off the crap, do!

This lolo guy is not only ignorant of US history, he's ignorant of British history too! Some US States outlawed slavery BEFORE the British government did! The Brits outlawed the slave trade in the empire in 1807, and didn't outlaw slavery entirely until 1833. That's about 30 years before the entire US outlawed it. What were the British doing between 1620 and 1807???? They were buying, selling, trading, and owning slaves, AND making mucho pounds from the slave trade.

This lolo guy tried to pull this idiocy before when he claimed the British won the battle of Baltimore during the War of 1812. I suppose the best thing that can be said of him is that he's...... "Historically Impaired"???
 
This lolo guy is not only ignorant of US history, he's ignorant of British history too! Some US States outlawed slavery BEFORE the British government did! The Brits outlawed the slave trade in the empire in 1807, and didn't outlaw slavery entirely until 1833. That's about 30 years before the entire US outlawed it. What were the British doing between 1620 and 1807???? They were buying, selling, trading, and owning slaves, AND making mucho pounds from the slave trade.

This lolo guy tried to pull this idiocy before when he claimed the British won the battle of Baltimore during the War of 1812. I suppose the best thing that can be said of him is that he's...... "Historically Impaired"???


Yeah...its all most typical of a leftists.

No greater truism than this one: http://www.hark.com/clips/dlvxhnstwz-the-trouble-with-our-liberal-friends
 
Werbung:
This lolo guy is not only ignorant of US history, he's ignorant of British history too! Some US States outlawed slavery BEFORE the British government did! The Brits outlawed the slave trade in the empire in 1807, and didn't outlaw slavery entirely until 1833. That's about 30 years before the entire US outlawed it. What were the British doing between 1620 and 1807???? They were buying, selling, trading, and owning slaves, AND making mucho pounds from the slave trade.

The U.S. only had about 4% of the slave trade. I wonder what percentage the Brits were involved with, in owning, procuring and selling and how much of our 4% did we buy from them?
 
Back
Top