Leftist protesters invade the Capitol again, but no arrests or long jail terms are expected since these gangsters support Hamas

Dominion has not supported investigations into their machines and that makes them untrustworthy witnesses. Democrats deny the reports from non-Democrat sources, but they have no reports at all showing their machines have been examined by unbiased experts who support the leftist rejections of non-Democrat investigative reports.
Courts have denied all your so called evidence lol
You morons lost every court case about fraud
You are total lovers lol
 
Werbung:
Your posts simply show you are a *****
If you had credible evidence you would go to court but you morons know you can't lol
And why you morons keep losing defamation lawsuits lol
The fact that Democrats cannot refute the evidence they deny is all but proof the Democrats did commit the voter fraud as the evidence shows.
 
The fact that Democrats cannot refute the evidence they deny is all but proof the Democrats did commit the voter fraud as the evidence shows.
Can't refute? Prove that, legal *****
Ignoring whining by morons is not the same thing lol

Post all the fraud cases you morons have won with your evidence... lololololololo.
 
His arguments are compelling and attacking his character does not refute his arguments.
Ramslans evidence was thoroughly debunked by an actual computer science expert
Ramslaand majored in political science lol

Only morons hire political science majors to do computer science work
 
Courts have denied all your so called evidence lol
You morons lost every court case about fraud
You are total lovers lol
No court looked into voting machines and declared the evidence shows the machines could not have been corrupted in 2020. No court has researched the voting records to see whether a significant number of voters listed a fake address, making their votes ineligible. No court researched the number of illegal immigrants who voted to determine if the number was large enough to flip the results of the election. And so forth.
 
No court looked into voting machines and declared the evidence shows the machines could not have been corrupted in 2020. No court has researched the voting records to see whether a significant number of voters listed a fake address, making their votes ineligible. No court researched the number of illegal immigrants who voted to determine if the number was large enough to flip the results of the election. And so forth.
No court agreed with your evidence lol
It takes complete morons to lose over 60 court cases lolololololololol
 
Ramslans evidence was thoroughly debunked by an actual computer science expert
Ramslaand majored in political science lol

Only morons hire political science majors to do computer science work
Democrats did not investigate the voting machines themselves and blocked others from examining them because informed Democrats are certain many voting machines were corrupted in the 2020 election.
 
No court looked into voting machines and declared the evidence shows the machines could not have been corrupted in 2020. No court has researched the voting records to see whether a significant number of voters listed a fake address, making their votes ineligible. No court researched the number of illegal immigrants who voted to determine if the number was large enough to flip the results of the election. And so forth.
Morons hire a political science major to analyze computers
Intelligent people hire computer science majors
 
Democrats did not investigate the voting machines themselves and blocked others from examining them because informed Democrats are certain many voting machines were corrupted in the 2020 election.
Which red states were blocked by Democrats
List the investigations, *****

And Democrats, not being morons like Republicans, didn't investigate based on whining duh
 
Werbung:
No court agreed with your evidence lol
It takes complete morons to lose over 60 court cases lolololololololol
We have evidence that thousands, maybe tens of thousands of illegal immigrants voted in 2020. What court disagreed with that evidence and what was the court's argument?
 
Back
Top