Leftist protesters invade the Capitol again, but no arrests or long jail terms are expected since these gangsters support Hamas

mark francis said:
All investigations done in the first few weeks after the election were simplistic at best. To determine whether massive voting fraud occurred would take months or more of laborious examinations of records. There were no such deep dive investigations before most courts decided against taking on cases of voter fraud.
Click to expand...
Courts can't decide not to take on cases, legal koron
Gives examples that prove your claim, lying *****
 
Werbung:
pjmret said:
Courts can't decide not to take on cases, legal koron
Gives examples that prove your claim, lying *****
Click to expand...
Say what you will but the left was reporting that courts rejected voting fraud cases long before any deep dive voting fraud investigations had even been conducted.
 
mark francis said:
Say what you will but the left was reporting that courts rejected voting fraud cases.
Click to expand...
No. It wasn't fabricated by democrats. It was a decision from the courts which was in the press and known by everyone who wanted to know. Cut your bullshyt conspiracy crap. You're paranoid.
mark francis said:
long before any deep dive voting fraud investigations had even been conducted.
Click to expand...
There was no deep dive, as you now claim, investigations. The ballot count was accepted by the courts. End of story. You're simply mischief making with no supporting evidence.
When Trump won the same ballot count was accepted by the appropriate authority. Then suddenly when he gets kicked out it's election fraud because you were beaten and Trump said so.
You've got no brains at all son. Have a think about it. It's sour grapes and Trump defeat syndrome.
 
Boris Norris said:
No. It wasn't fabricated by democrats. It was a decision from the courts which was in the press and known by everyone who wanted to know. Cut your bullshyt conspiracy crap. You're paranoid.

There was no deep dive, as you now claim, investigations. The ballot count was accepted by the courts. End of story. You're simply mischief making with no supporting evidence.
When Trump won the same ballot count was accepted by the appropriate authority. Then suddenly when he gets kicked out it's election fraud because you were beaten and Trump said so.
You've got no brains at all son. Have a think about it. It's sour grapes and Trump defeat syndrome.
Click to expand...
Refusing to do comprehensive investigations into voting fraud allowed the Democrats to steal the election and they will keep stealing power as long as America allows them to do so without examining what they have been doing for more than 100 years, with an explosion of widespread fraud in 2020.
 
pjmret said:
No, you claimed it
Stop trying to blame others for your lies
Click to expand...
No extensive investigations of voting machines were allowed by the bent political party short of a court order obtained for extremely limited examinations that Democrats claimed were corrupt.
 
mark francis said:
No extensive investigations of voting machines were allowed by the bent political party short of a court order obtained for extremely limited examinations that Democrats claimed were corrupt.
Click to expand...
Nope machines were looked at, lying *****
 
pjmret said:
Nope machines were looked at, lying *****
Click to expand...
Looking at the machines may be how leftists have determined that no machine was corrupted by leftists for Democrats, but forensic examinations of the machines must be conducted soon after elections in order to determine if the machines had been corrupted during that election. There were only a very few of the thousands of machines controlled by leftists in 2020 that were ever forensically examined by non-biased 3rd party experts.
 
mark francis said:
Looking at the machines may be how leftists have determined that no machine was corrupted by leftists for Democrats, but forensic examinations of the machines must be conducted soon after elections in order to determine if the machines had been corrupted during that election. There were only a very few of the thousands of machines controlled by leftists in 2020 that were ever forensically examined by non-biased 3rd party experts.
Click to expand...
And forensic exams did, *****
 
pjmret said:
And forensic exams did, *****
Click to expand...
Democrats cannot name five forensics examinations of voting machines immediately after the 2020 election, yet there were thousands of machines programmed, operated, and controlled exclusively by Democrats in 2020 that Democrats prevented non-biased experts from examining.
 
mark francis said:
Democrats cannot name five forensics examinations of voting machines immediately after the 2020 election, yet there were thousands of machines programmed, operated, and controlled exclusively by Democrats in 2020 that Democrats prevented non-biased experts from examining.
Click to expand...
You can't name a single bit of credible evidence duh
No one wastes time and money because morons whine
 
mark francis said:
Looking at the machines may be how leftists have determined that no machine was corrupted by leftists for Democrats, but forensic examinations of the machines must be conducted soon after elections in order to determine if the machines had been corrupted during that election. There were only a very few of the thousands of machines controlled by leftists in 2020 that were ever forensically examined by non-biased 3rd party experts.
Click to expand...
How does one corrupt a voting machine? Do you even know?
 
Gabriel_Bell said:
How does one corrupt a voting machine? Do you even know?
Click to expand...
Voting machines are vulnerable to several different methods of corruption, and Democrats know that. The machines can be programmed to flip votes, create votes, change votes, etc. Machines can be hacked, remotely monitored and manipulated and so forth. However, the evidence of corruption can be erased and that is likely why so many computer images were destroyed after the 2020 election, tabulators or memory cards were damaged or lost, and so forth. A judge had to stop workers in Georgia from erasing 2020 data from the Dominion machines.

District judge halts 3 Georgia counties from erasing Dominion voting machine data | Fox News 11-30-20
GEORGIA
Published November 30, 2020 11:43am EST

District judge halts 3 Georgia counties from erasing Dominion voting machine data

Republican electors are seeking to inspect Dominion machines

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Check out this former type of built-in mechanism for erasing voting records from machines:

https://www.wired.com/2009/03/ca-report-finds/

3-3-0009

After three months of investigation, California's secretary of state has released a report examining why a voting system made by Premier Election Solutions (formerly known as Diebold) lost about 200 ballots in Humboldt County during November's presidential election.

But the most startling information in the state's 13-page report (.pdf) is not why the system lost votes, which Wired.com previously covered in detail, but that some versions of Diebold's vote tabulation system, known as the Global Election Management System (Gems), include a button that allows someone to delete audit logs from the system.

Auditing logs are required under the federal voting-system guidelines, which are used to test and qualify voting systems for use in elections. The logs record changes and other events that occur on voting systems to ensure the integrity of elections and help determine what occurred in a system when something goes wrong.

"Deleting a log is something that you would only do in de-commissioning a system you're no longer using or perhaps in a testing scenario," said Princeton University computer scientist Ed Felten, who has studied voting systems extensively. "But in normal operation, the log should always be kept."

Yet the Diebold system in Humboldt County, which uses version 1.18.19 of Gems, has a button labeled Clear, that "permits deletion of certain audit logs that contain — or should contain — records that would be essential to reconstruct operator actions during the vote-tallying process," according to the California report.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

These Sequoia machines were owned by Smartmatic which had direct ties to George Soros and his voting machine theft of the 2006 election in Venezuela. These machines had a button on the back that could illegally add votes to the total without counting legitimate ballots.

Button on e-voting machine allows multiple votes – East Bay Times 11-1-06

PUBLISHED November 1, 2006 at 8:54 p.m. | UPDATED: August 17, 2016 at 5:47 a.m.

Days before the election, state officials have learned that California’s most widely used electronic voting machines feature a button in back that can allow someone to vote multiple times.

Several computer scientists said Wednesday that the vulnerability found in all touch-screen machines sold by Oakland-based Sequoia Voting Systems was not especially great because using the yellow button for vote fraud would require reaching far behind the voting machine twice and triggering two beeps.

“If the machine beeps loudly and someone has their arms wrapped around the machine, the poll workers are going to become suspicious,” said David Wagner, a computer security and voting system expert at the University of California, Berkeley.

“It’s kind of hard for me to see how this could be used very widely,” he said. “It’s retail fraud, so it’s onesies and twosies and can only affect very close races.”
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Refusing to do comprehensive investigations into voting fraud allowed the Democrats to steal the election and they will keep stealing power as long as America allows them to do so without examining what they have been doing for more than 100 years, with an explosion of widespread fraud in 2020.
Click to expand...
Shut up you old fart. You e been belching this for years and it's bullshyt. Grow up.
 
Back
Top