So, not only do we have to pay the cost of destroying it, we also have to pay for rebuilding it...thats not something I want my tax dollars to go for.
That's opposed to Alaska where the population get's a free hand out from the state government every year.
You might want to read up on exactly how that system works. But either way, we all pay taxes on that income...to buy more bombs and books for the Iraqi kids.
Their community struggled much more than yours.
You dont know that.
What's more interesting to me, is that congress stuck in a special expenditures for things not even related to either Iraq or construction. $415 Million went to Walter Reed. That's a government run hospital that was in such bad shape, it made national headlines, and of course politics makes it a priority.
Wait a minute here Andy,
You mean to tell me that getting a military hospital back into the proper shape has nothing to do with Iraq? Where do you think the guys being treated there are getting hurt?
Can't wait for that same socialist system to be effecting all hospitals. Socialism... it always fails.
Socialism seems to be doing alright in Alaska. Love them Gubment munnies
Also, there's another $112 Million for California. Just... California. No qualifiers. Looks like a political kick back to me. Why would they randomly have $112 million set aside for California in a bill on construction in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Dunno, good chance that it is some sort of re-imbursment or PILT money from expenditures that California and a number of other states incur with high military presence.