Jason76
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
- Messages
- 506
You don't believe in free speech? Silencing people because you don't agree with them, won't change them. Like the people in your example... they'd be just as hateful and dangerous (and probably more dangerous) if silenced. They let a lot of it out through those hateful words (which are often uttered in an echo chamber instead of in public spaces where they would be met with opposition).
It's like our resident hater here. I wonder why he hasn't been banned for his behavior, but then again, it's better for him to vomit words here than it is for him to be elsewhere where he might actually harm someone.
People should have freedom of speech, but not the freedom to harass. The racists I mentioned were harassing people. Nonetheless, some harassment is free speech, while other stuff, like burning crosses on their property or dumping leaflets on their lawn (They did drop the leaflets.) is rightfully illegal.
Some stuff the racists were doing included burning crosses in their own yard and flying white supremacist flags to terrorize the family when they drove by, as there was only one major road from the family's home to town.
However, should people have the right to "legally harass"? That's a debatable topic and I might have to come against free speech.
Also note that when the shoe was on the other foot, blacks could not legally or illegally harass whites under Jim Crow.
Last edited: