I would be more than happy to help pay for the life of a child. But you should realize the cost would be much lower if the abortionist would not have tried to kill the child on their way out of the womb
It is the "mother" who decides if there is value in her child and abortionist who kills her child and politicians who voted to let them decide on what baby lives or dies who does the deciding unfortunately.
What you call heroic actually sends chills up my spine.
Do you know what the term "heroic measures" means in medicine?
It means engaging in treatments that willcertainly cause even more damage or suffering, with little chance of cure or even prolonging death, basically a last chance attempt to prolong the life of someone who would certainly die in very short term if those heroic measures are not attempted.
Now, you are probably wondering why anyone would choose to not engage in those measures if a fetus is born breathing (outside of the cost which is usually huge). Well, here is one example that gives both a common reason why a woman would choose to have a late term abortion, and why letting a non liveable fetus die without engaging in heroic measures may in fact save more lifes:
sorry, I wanted to do a copy and paste, and I lost the text, so I will need to go copy it again.
Here is the article:
[QUOT3. ANENCEPHALIC BABIES (sample)
The literal meaning of anencephaly is "no brain." But the term is not exactly accurate for
an = negative*****enkephalos = brain
describing the condition of anencephalic babies. Such babies have no cerebrum or cerebellum but they do have a brain stem. The brain stem allows them to breathe and allows their hearts to beat. But the babies cannot see, hear, or feel anything. They will never be able to think or achieve what is called "personhood."
Anencephalic babies are thus not technically brain dead. Yet there is general consensus that heroic measures should not be used to keep them alive. In fact, anencephaly may be one of the few medical conditions that all doctors agree is futile to treat.
About 1000 anencephalic babies are born in the United States each year. The condition can be diagnosed prenatally, and most women (about 95%) who learn that they will have an anencephalic child choose to have an abortion. Of the 5% of the anencephalic infants who are born, about 55% are stillborn. The rest?the remaining 1000?are said to be "born dying."
Sometimes the parents of an anencephalic infant want to donate the infant's organs to other babies who need healthy organs. They say that, by donating the newborn's organs, they feel that the pregnancy would at least have had some value: their own loss can be another family's gain. In the United States, about 2000 babies each year need organs, and the only suitable organs for tiny babies are those from other tiny babies.
Organs cannot, however, be removed from individuals who are alive, and anencephalic babies, though born dying, are not dead. Thus, the debates have raged about whether it is appropriate to make an exception exclusively with anencephalic infants, changing the definition of "dead" in their case so that needed organs can be removed in time to be of use.
In 1992, for example, the parents of an anencephalic baby named Baby Theresa wanted to donate her organs. But the courts, all the way to the Florida Supreme Court, would not declare her dead. She lived for ten days. When she died, her organs could no longer be transplanted. On the day of her death, Baby Theresa's parents and a surgeon appeared on the Phil Donahue Show to talk about the need to change the law, so that organs from infants like Baby Theresa could be made available to others.E][/QUOTE]
