facts are fact bevis democrats have a history of protecting criminals illegals who are sex offenders and criminals and perverts and pedophiles and while Im not going to say I think biden is one hes creepy as hell around kids and hunter is a pervert
www.breitbart.com
www.today.com
townhall.com
www.breitbart.com
Its a perverted far left woke goal.Nolte: Yes, Democrats Really Do Want to Groom Your Children
Of course the political left wants to sexually groom little kids. The evidence is everywhere and the reasons why are sick and political.
THE LEFT: We don’t want to sexualize little kids behind the backs of parents. Stop saying that. It’s a lie!
FLORIDA: We’re going to outlaw sexualizing little kids behind the backs of parents.
THE LEFT: NOOOOooooooo!
What kind of country are we living in where we even have to pass a bill that outlaws sexualizing kids aged four to eight in the classroom?
What kind of country are we living in where Florida teachers are angry that they can’t discuss their personal lives with your little kids, much less discuss sex?
What kind of country are we living in where the Walt Disney Co., a company built on the idea of preserving the innocence of children and teaching them lessons about honesty, hard work, and true love, is now openly bragging about feeding the little kids sexual propaganda?
Of course, this is grooming.
What else would you call it?
What is the rationale for telling innocent little boys that they might be girls or gay or bisexual? What other rationale could there be for that other than to destroy their innocence, to turn them into sexual creatures, and warp their sexuality into something that can later be exploited?
Behind the backs of parents!
For the life of me, except for my second-grade teacher talking about the day John Kennedy was assassinated, I cannot remember a single teacher who ever discussed their personal life. A couple of times, I remember seeing a teacher outside of school, at the store or something, and how odd it was to realize they existed outside the classroom.
The thing to keep in mind here is that this is not a “gay” thing.
It’s not gay people looking to groom little kids.
Plenty of gay people are as disgusted by this as anyone. In fact, this sick movement is a terrible disservice to gays. What you have here is the LEFT working overtime to bring to life the very worst stereotypes about homosexuals looking to recruit among the innocent.
What you have here is Disney bringing to life these terrible stereotypes.
But that doesn’t change the fact that the left is desperate to groom your kids, to sexualize them behind your back.
Why?
Well, a whole lot of leftists want to have sex with your kids, and want to normalize sex between kids and adults. The evidence of that is everywhere. Democrats know opening the southern border will mean the import of child sex slaves. And yet, Democrats still open the border. Democrats continue to release child predators and suspected predators. We’re about to be saddled with a Supreme Court Justice who shrugs at child porn. More than one left-wing publication has asked us to better understand and sympathize with child molesters. The left embraced Jeffrey Epstein for decades. The left-wing Lincoln Project shielded a suspected predator.
The other reason for the grooming is political.
Democrats are losing key parts of their coalition: the working class, Hispanics, and chunks of the black population. One way they see of making up those numbers is to create a lot of damaged and broken young people obsessed with their sexuality. It’s just a fact that neurotic, unhappy lunatics and narcissists who define themselves by what they do with their sex organs vote Democrat. So… Democrats want to damage your kids to create a whole lot more of them.
There is nothing healthy about exposing prepubescent kids to sexuality. And doing it behind the backs of parents is outright demonic.
www.washingtontimes.com
It doesn't matter. She's there and none of the immature criticism by delusional godbotherer s was ever going to stop her. Suck eggs.Ketanji Brown Jackson being soft on pedophilia and child pornography is a big deal
Ketanji Brown Jackson being soft on pedophilia and child pornography is a big deal
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s troubling record on child pornography is a big deal. Child pornography is an epidemic plaguing our country.
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s troubling record on child pornography is a big deal. Child pornography is an epidemic plaguing our country.
Filmed rape of children is a federal crime and causes a trauma one cannot even fathom. It is then possessed and distributed as child pornography, known as child sexual abuse material because that’s what it is — child abuse.
During Judge Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Sen. Josh Hawley and others have pointed out her history of light sentencing in child pornography cases. What’s even more troubling is her commentary about such cases.
While serving on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson asked if there could be “a less-serious child pornography offender who is engaging in the type of conduct in the group experience level because their motivation is the challenge, or to use the technology.” She also wondered if “the people who are in this … find status in their participation in the community, but would be categorized as nonsexually motivated.”
During her Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Judge Jackson has defended her apparent sympathy for offenders over victims and evaded questions about her responsibility for appropriate sentencing. She doubled down on the notion of “less-serious” sexual offenders.
Judge Jackson’s record and commentary display a worldview problem on the nature of evil: what is right, what is wrong, what is abhorrent and what is just.
Individuals who abuse children, including possessing and/or distributing child pornography, are not a “community” to protect or receive leniency. These are criminals. Over 99% of the reports received last year by the CyberTipline, a service provided by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, were for CSAM-related incidents. All states include sexual abuse in their definitions of child abuse, which includes forcing children into engaging in prostitution and the production of pornography. The New York Times has called this rise in CSAM crime “astronomical.”
Law enforcement agencies review CyberTipline reports, prioritizing materials depicting infants and toddlers. Think about that. Children of all ages — including infants and toddlers — are being sexually abused and filmed for others’ perverse entertainment. Houston, we have a problem!
Pornography and sex trafficking are also symbiotically linked. The definition of sex trafficking includes any commercial sex act with a minor and the distribution of child sexual abuse material. Of the more than 25,000 endangered runaways reported to NCMEC in 2021, 1 in 6 were likely victims of child sex trafficking.
If that wasn’t bad enough, survivors of CSAM-related crimes are continually revictimized as the most horrific moments in their lives are distributed and replayed among pedophiles.
“I did not choose to be there, but now I am there forever in pictures that people are using to do sick things,” said one survivor of filmed child sexual abuse. “I want it all erased. I want it all stopped. But I am powerless to stop it just like I was powerless to stop my uncle.”
What seems lost on Judge Jackson in all of this are the voices of the victims of child pornography. Simply put, child pornography is a crime scene. Yet instead of defending victims, she has defended and sympathized with sexual offenders.
The possession, creation and distribution of child pornography are directly related to sex trafficking in that it creates a pedophilic cycle of demand in which children are trafficked to meet that demand. There is no hierarchy of “less-serious” offenders in this triad of organized child sexual exploitation.
The demand for exploiting children doesn’t stop at possessing, distributing or creating, and the newest form of online child sexual exploitation is now webcam sex tourism. This is where predators can evade possessing child pornography by paying facilitators around the world to livestream sexual abuse acts on children that are performed at viewers’ direction.
There is no reason our society should be soft on the victimization of women and children. Judge Jackson’s words and actions in dealing with the problem of pedophilia make her unqualified for the highest court in the land.
As a Black woman, I realize representation matters. But righteousness matters even more.
thefederalist.com
rumble.com
