Greenie-Weenies Knowledge Base matches CO² Levels...

I suspect there may be hundreds of thousands of bobble head leftists who preach global warming while being unable to prove what they preach.
Says the ***** who doesn't understand how important even small amounts of carbon dioxide can be LOL
 
Werbung:
You say small amounts of CO2. How much change in CO2 concentrations did the world see in the great global warming pause earlier this century. Do you even know how many years the great pause covered?

If you read your link's climate goes longer than the 15 year. you refer to so you're stupid attempt to discredit climate change as well stupid
 
If you read your link's climate goes longer than the 15 year. you refer to so you're stupid attempt to discredit climate change as well stupid
Of course the climate goes on and on. 15 years is nothing, just like 100 years is nothing. Some experts claim the world was once frozen to the core, so naturally we would expect warming to be normal for life today.
 
That link is most amusing a clearly supports global climate change thanks for posting a link that makes you look stupid
I'm sure the radical climate change cultists can find ways to align the data to fit their narratives, but sloppy interpretations of data is not how real science works. Here is what blindly believing leftist alarmists has led respectable people to say:

Al Gore Slips On Artic Ice; Misstates Scientist's Forecast : The Two-Way : NPR 12-15-09

Al Gore Slips On Artic Ice; Misstates Scientist's Forecast

In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference (2009): "These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years."
 
Of course the climate goes on and on. 15 years is nothing, just like 100 years is nothing. Some experts claim the world was once frozen to the core, so naturally we would expect warming to be normal for life today.
yes but its getting hotter. duh. due to more greenhouse gases.
 
al
I'm sure the radical climate change cultists can find ways to align the data to fit their narratives, but sloppy interpretations of data is not how real science works. Here is what blindly believing leftist alarmists has led respectable people to say:

Al Gore Slips On Artic Ice; Misstates Scientist's Forecast : The Two-Way : NPR 12-15-09

Al Gore Slips On Artic Ice; Misstates Scientist's Forecast

In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference (2009): "These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years."
al gore? who cares about him? he's not a scientist. duh
why do you post this stupidity? lol
 
yes but its getting hotter. duh. due to more greenhouse gases.
Baloney. Global warming fiction science is driven by the greed of those attempting to financially cash in on the fear caused by the unjustly propagated false science alarmism.
 
Baloney. Global warming fiction science is driven by the greed of those attempting to financially cash in on the fear caused by the unjustly propagated false science alarmism.
more right wing talking points. lol.

you are a true science *****.
 
al

al gore? who cares about him? he's not a scientist. duh
why do you post this stupidity? lol
I know you don't care for those who don't agree with you or who make you look foolish for believing nonsense, but Al Gore was parroting widespread leftist pseudoscience narratives promoting fake global warming alarmism for financial gain.
 
I know you don't care for those who don't agree with you or who make you look foolish for believing nonsense, but Al Gore was parroting widespread leftist pseudoscience narratives promoting fake global warming alarmism for financial gain.

you keep talking about al gore. lol. he isn't relevant to a science discussion.
how stupid.
 
you keep talking about al gore. lol. he isn't relevant to a science discussion.
how stupid.
Al Gore was following the pseudoscience and that was why he was wrong when discussing global warming, just like you are wrong now.
 
Al Gore was following the pseudoscience and that was why he was wrong when discussing global warming, just like you are wrong now.
no, he was a politician, not a scientist. quoting him as if that disproves science does however prove you are a science *****. lol
 
Werbung:
no, he was a politician, not a scientist. quoting him as if that disproves science does however prove you are a science *****. lol
perhaps you have a point. We should never listen to Greta Thunberg, John Kerry, Joe Biden, AOC, and hundreds of other quacks trying to pontificate about global warming when they have no qualifications.
 
Back
Top