Tell me bob, where, in any of those sites, or the sites that they link to is an example of a species gone extinct due to the changing global climate?
Well, you aren't accepting back-radiation of IR, you claim GHGs don't function in the open atmosphere, and you claim a convection experiment disproves back-radiation, of IR. Do you see any reason at all, why I should get into physics, with YOU, just to make you and your trolling pals look smarter, than you are?
Again bob, professor Wood's experiment wasn't about backradiation. It was proof that the glass wasn't trapping IR. Do you have such a small grasp on the science that you don't even know what the experiment was about?
And you shouldn't get into physics with me bob because I actually understand the subject and can discuss it and do the math while you don't even know what basic experiments are about.
You'll just FAIL and ride on, at some point, pr.
The only one failing here bob is you. Claiming mass extinctions due to climate change and linking to a few extinctions due to hunting and land useage and completely missing the point of professor Wood's experiment. I note that you didn't mention the experiment that was actually dealing with backradiation at all.
I don't believe you have identified evolutionary processes, in a cogent way. Modern species and families didn't just pop out, in the middle of a 2000 ppm CO2 hot-house, to get where we are, today.
Really? When did most of the modern species in the oceans first appear bob? Name a time period and then tell me what the atmospheric CO2 looked like at the time.
If you aren't tired of failure, see if you can identify transitory ocean temperatures and other factors at play, when any modern species evolved, when we aren't in a hot-house, NOW, and we are moving, into a hot-house, in such a way that ocean species and families will fail, while no land species will be spared, from die-offs.
Well, I am growing tired of your failures. You are to easy bob, and to ask such a question, it is obvious that you have NEVER taken any time at all to familiarize yourself with the life and climate of the ancient world. Not to worry though, few warmers have. If you had, you wouldn't be so easily hoaxed by the present crop of charlatans calling themselves climate scientists.
Most of what could be called modern marine invertebrates first appeared during the cambrian period, some 500 million years ago. The average global mean temperature was about 8 degrees C warmer than the present and atmospheric CO2 was something between 4,500 and 7,000 PPM.
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/9/4457.full
Of course evolution continued and the creatures changed a bit during that period, but by the devonian period, much marine life had taken on its present day morphology. Many fossils from that time are nearly indistinguishable from modern forms. During that period, the average global mean temperature was, again, about 8 degrees C warmer than the present and atmospheric CO2 levels were something like 3000 ppm.
You see bob, you have nothing to fear regarding ocean acidification and the accomanying mass extinctions those fear mongering charlatans have made you believe in. The evidence simply doesn't support their claims.
If YOU think modern species are going to make it through a fast transition, toward anything like 2000 ppm CO2 concentrations, I have news, for YOU. It's called FAIL, and then RIDE, but you won't ride, through all of what is to come. You will FAIL, to ride, through the coming climate troubles.
So you claim, but alas, bob, you can't provide a shred of evidence to support your claims while 500 million years of paleohistory supports my position. Here is a paper that should put your fears to bed. Laboratory experimentation clearly shows that elevated CO2 levels are not going to kill off the oceans which was predictable since most of the life there evolved during a time when atmospheric CO2 levels were considerably higher than the 2000 ppm which is the upper limit of the experiment.
I occasionally use caps, to make sure you READ key words. Also it helps me pick out my posts, from in the middle, of a lot of troll-scat.
[/quote]
I read all the words bob, whether they are in caps or lower case subscript. I don't buy your arguments though no matter how large you make them because no actual hard evidence exists to support them and further, they fly in the face of hundreds of millions of years of paleohistory.
