Gay Sex Kills

[Dr.Who]

I think you're right when it comes to guy on guy action.

Do you think that guys feel the same way about girl on girl action?

Let's face it guys are gross and some women are pretty. I have more of a problem with ugly people getting it on than anything else.

I am not homophobic I am uglyphobic.

Two guys toghether is ugly and grosses me out. Two ugly girls together would gross me out too. As would an ugly girl and an guy.

Now lest I offend the ugly girls let me clarify that ugliness is not caused by your genetics or condition. Mostly you make yourself ugly by your attitude and your own choices. A girl with a big nose could be pretty if she were pleasant and took care of herself. Guys, sorry you (and me ) are just out of luck - we are ugly.

Which not only explains homophobia but also why guys like sex more than straight women do.

And I do hope you all can recognize a joke when you see one.

 

[The Scotsman]

For some reason the picture never came up on my last post so here you are....anyway how does that look Dr. Who

 

[PLC1]

For some reason the picture never came up on my last post so here you are....anyway how does that look Dr. Who

That picture shows homosexuality in a whole new light, now doesn't it? How many guys here are grossed out by the idea of those two chicks doing whatever gay chicks do?

The negative reaction to homosexuality is mostly men who find the idea of sex with other men disgusting. I share that feeling, but there are those who don't. To each is own, so long as it only involves consenting adults.

Say, Scotsman, I've tried posting pictures on this forum, with no luck. When I click on the little picture postcard icon at the top of the box, all I get is a "whoop!" sound. The same happens when I try to imbed a link. Any idea what is wrong?

 

[numinus]

That picture shows homosexuality in a whole new light, now doesn't it? How many guys here are grossed out by the idea of those two chicks doing whatever gay chicks do?

The negative reaction to homosexuality is mostly men who find the idea of sex with other men disgusting. I share that feeling, but there are those who don't. To each is own, so long as it only involves consenting adults.

So, why even bring it up in school, if it only involves the adults who consented, hmmm?

 

[vyo476]

Since when is one's preferred sexual practice become part of the public domain, hmmm?

Since people decided it was okay to discriminate based on it. Perhaps you haven't been to a public school in America in a while, so I'll inform you: being different in any way isn't okay with the student body as a whole, and if it's something as big as being homosexual, all kinds of unfortunateness are to follow.

Schools can either sit there and ignore it as their homosexual students get picked on, beaten up, etc., or they can step in and (gasp!) educate their students in tolerance.

 

[The Scotsman]

Schools can either sit there and ignore it as their homosexual students get picked on, beaten up, etc., or they can step in and (gasp!) educate their students in tolerance.

.....bullying I think is the word you're looking for! Been a problem in schools since schools began and exists to this day all over the world. But as you say just "educate" the kids and hey presto...problem solved!


Would that also work for the spotty kid or the fat kid or the nerd in the corner with the geeky face.....I think not. But if you think it'll work for the "queer" kid then fine, I'm all for it!

 

[The Scotsman]

And going for the double wammy on intolerance and predjudice ....

Muslim man threatens to sue driving school for sending transsexual instructor to teach his wife

'You have sent me a man. Send me a proper female. How dare you send a man with a deep voice,' he told Joanne Dixon, who runs the school in West Yorkshire.

The man, a Muslim from the Meadowhall district of Sheffield who has not been named, claimed the company deliberately sent a man disguised as a woman.

'His attitude and behaviour was outrageous and has upset me and Emma and everyone else who works here,' Miss Dixon said.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ending-transsexual-instructor-teach-wife.html

jeeez what a tangled web we weave!!?? pick the bones out of that one.................

 

[numinus]

Since people decided it was okay to discriminate based on it. Perhaps you haven't been to a public school in America in a while, so I'll inform you: being different in any way isn't okay with the student body as a whole, and if it's something as big as being homosexual, all kinds of unfortunateness are to follow.

Schools can either sit there and ignore it as their homosexual students get picked on, beaten up, etc., or they can step in and (gasp!) educate their students in tolerance.

Nonsense.

A lot of people get beaten up in highschool. What makes gays special, hmmm?

And there are serious consequences for beating up someone. That should be enough lesson on 'tolerance'.

 

[vyo476]

Nonsense.

A lot of people get beaten up in highschool. What makes gays special, hmmm?

Hate crimes tend to be especially vicious. When two kids get into a fight and one beats the other up, yeah, that's bad. When five kids ambush and gang up on one kid for being different, it's a lot worse.

And there are serious consequences for beating up someone. That should be enough lesson on 'tolerance'.

Well, it isn't, and it hasn't been for quite some time.

Punishments for fighting have been implemented to limited effectiveness. Now schools are taking it a step further by attacking the problem at its roots. Wouldn't you prefer to prevent all homophobic fights rather than preventing most of them by making an example of the ones that happen?

 

[The Scotsman]

Now schools are taking it a step further by attacking the problem at its roots.

....what does that mean "at its roots"??

4 posts up I said kids have been bullying other kids since time began what "roots" are you talking about?

 

[numinus]

Hate crimes tend to be especially vicious. When two kids get into a fight and one beats the other up, yeah, that's bad. When five kids ambush and gang up on one kid for being different, it's a lot worse.

Well, it isn't, and it hasn't been for quite some time.

Punishments for fighting have been implemented to limited effectiveness. Now schools are taking it a step further by attacking the problem at its roots. Wouldn't you prefer to prevent all homophobic fights rather than preventing most of them by making an example of the ones that happen?

I am at a loss as to where you propose to go with this line of reasoning.

Tolerance is a question of ethics -- a subject matter that belongs in an institution of learning. But the study of ethics inadvertantly touches on subjects of religion, since the two inquiries overlap.

So rather than have a comprehensive discussion of ethics (and risk the mention of religion in a formal classroom setting), you would rather have gays talk about their personal experiences and feelings of how they were born that way.

In the meantime, people who aren't gay, but are different nonetheless, continue to ge beat up since you found it necessary to be tolerant to gays only.

 

[ilikeboobs]

Punishments for fighting have been implemented to limited effectiveness. Now schools are taking it a step further by attacking the problem at its roots. Wouldn't you prefer to prevent all homophobic fights rather than preventing most of them by making an example of the ones that happen?

Ah, and therein lies the issue of policing people's thoughts. Dangerous, DANGEROUS proposition, dude.

The motive behind a crime shouldn't be a factor in deciding punishment. Whether you steal because you are hungry or steal because you're a kleptomaniac, the result should always be the same - xxx of days in prison.

It's odd that if a homo slaps me in the face he gets a slap on the wrist.
but if i punch that very same homo in the face, i could get 10 years in jail.
how is that right? in any circumstance?

 

[vyo476]

I am at a loss as to where you propose to go with this line of reasoning.

And I'm at a loss for how you come up with things like the contents of this post.

Tolerance is a question of ethics -- a subject matter that belongs in an institution of learning. But the study of ethics inadvertantly touches on subjects of religion, since the two inquiries overlap.

So rather than have a comprehensive discussion of ethics (and risk the mention of religion in a formal classroom setting), you would rather have gays talk about their personal experiences and feelings of how they were born that way.

I have no problem with an open, honest, factual discussion of religion in schools. As I've mentioned before, I myself took several classes on religion throughout school and found them highly enlightening.

I might be confused as to what you're saying. Are you suggesting that in order to teach tolerance to kids, we'd have to teach them adherence to a religion? We'd have to teach them religious values? What is it that you think I'd be so opposed to?

In the meantime, people who aren't gay, but are different nonetheless, continue to ge beat up since you found it necessary to be tolerant to gays only.

This offends me a little. I am not a homosexual myself, but I was still different in many ways, and as a result I had a less than stellar school experience. Luckily I was always bigger than the other kids so I didn't get "beaten up," but I probably would have been had I not been fortunate in the size category.

I believe and promote tolerance towards everyone. I believe in educating kids about homosexuality because promoting tolerance towards homosexuals tends to be more difficult - other people understand them less than they understand, say, Goths. Just about everyone gets depressed from time to time, so even the "mainstream" kids in school at least understand, on some level, why the "Goth" kids (and yes, I was more or less "goth" in high school, in case you were wondering) are so down all the time. Getting straight kids to understand homosexuality is more difficult because they don't experience the same things homosexuals do.

I'd be all for promotion of tolerance as virulently as possible. I don't want to see any kids getting beaten up, for any reason.

 

[vyo476]

Ah, and therein lies the issue of policing people's thoughts. Dangerous, DANGEROUS proposition, dude.

The motive behind a crime shouldn't be a factor in deciding punishment. Whether you steal because you are hungry or steal because you're a kleptomaniac, the result should always be the same - xxx of days in prison.

I would prefer to take such things off the table by eliminating the problem before "policing" becomes necessary. Someday, when hate crimes are no longer prevalent, the added punishments attached to them will disappear.

It's odd that if a homo slaps me in the face he gets a slap on the wrist.
but if i punch that very same homo in the face, i could get 10 years in jail.
how is that right? in any circumstance?

It's a matter of deterrence. Just punching a gay man in the face won't necessarily be labelled a hate crime; if he can prove that you punched him because he is gay, then it is. Added punishments for hate crimes is entirely about deterring people from committing those crimes for that reason.

Personally, I'm not terribly fond of that system. I find it to be ineffectual at best. It does not serve the victim, because he's already had the snot kicked out of him. It does not serve the aggressor, because he's not learning to stop hating homosexuals. All it does is make an example of the aggressor in the hopes that other potential aggressors will back down. That sort of approach can backfire all too easily.

 

[Dr.Who]

For some reason the picture never came up on my last post so here you are....anyway how does that look Dr. Who

The carnal man that I am would only hope that it were pornographic. But I am more than what my desires are. I choose to rise above the nature of my flesh. I would not see it. Nor did I see the first one.