Again you are equating ratings with quality which is just plain foolish. That's all need be said.
No, I'm not equating ratings with quality, every ratings outlet in the WORLD equates ratings with quality.
Your support of a fool like O'Reilly makes me question your sanity.
You're making this entirely too easy. Show me where I've expressed ANY support for Bill O'Reilly. I simply used a recent attempt by your left-wing, libtard, looney-toons lunatics to try to smear FoxNews by intentionally using a single weeks RATINGS to try to promote that blithering idiot Olbermann as an example of how YOUR OWN PEOPLE use ratings to support their positions, and to be fair, I used the same metric that they did. What's the matter, can't stand it when someone uses your own tactics and beats you to death with them?
I'm older than 24, in fact I place down close to the middle of the 25-54 demographic.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to make fun of the mentally challenged like that. From the content of your postings, and the extreme lack of logic you routinely employ, I was under the impression that you were about 19.
You, on the other hand, I would estimate are older. I base this on your unbending support for out of date RW causes, your citing of the sixties, your inability to see the benefit in compromise, and your apparent hatred of Obama and backing of McCain. All this adds up to your being a senior citizen. Nothing wrong with that, just remember you are subject to such things as senile dementia which may significantly alter your take on the world. In fact, this may account for the absurdities that you cling to in many of your posts.
Not quite THAT old, but old enough to have boots older than you are. Perhaps one day when your mind catches up with your chronological age, you'll start using it for something other than a hat rack, but at this point, it would appear that it's barely qualified for that purpose. You've also made yet another "assumption" that is indicative of your lack of objectivity. I don't "hate" Obama, I merely find him to be woefully unqualified to be POTUS. Perhaps in another decade, AFTER he's had time to mature and learn more about how national politics actually works, he MAY be, but as it stands right now, he's too naive, too immature, and too unqualified for the position.
Here's some more demonstration of American's ignorance courtesy of a book called
Just How Stupid Are We?
And any of that has to do with...what? At the time of the American Revolution, less than half of the population of the 13 Colonies could even read, and even less could write their own name. The statistics that you cited (from a known leftist *****) fail to cite the specific study they were garnered from, so we have no way of determining the validity of the "studies" cited! You're also attempting to equate trivial knowledge with intelligence. I'd be willing to bet that if you and I sat down, I could ask you any of 100 "basic knowledge" questions and you'd be hard pressed to answer any of them. Have you ever watched "Are You Smarter Than A 5th Grader?" I've seen PhD's have to say that they weren't, but that doesn't make them "ignorant" or "stupid", it means that they've got far more important things to remember than some minutia that doesn't have any impact on their daily lives.
I'm just scratching the surface here, the link documents what I've been pointing out all along...Americans are woefully ignorant of their nation, the world and it's history. Fox takes advantage of such sheer stupidity and if you can't see that your bias has blinded you.
The only proof of anyones "bias" and "sheer stupidity" is your own, in that you willingly admit to having an agenda against Fox (how often do you watch it?), and your consistent ASSUMPTIONS that FoxNews is the only channel I watch.
Just to help you understand exactly how foolish you really are, yes, I do watch FoxNews, but I also watch my local news which happens to be a CBS affiliate, as well as CNN, and every morning I also read Reuters, BBC, Deutsche Welle (in German), the Berlin News (in German) Le Monde (in French), Le Figaro (in French) and the Wall Street Journal. I also read the L'OSSERVATORE RAMANO once a week (the Vatican News, in Italian), Now, perhaps one day when you pull your head out of your fourth point of contact, quit being a mindless hack for the DNC, and learn to ASK QUESTIONS before making ASSUMPTIONS, you MAY be qualified to engage me in an intelligent discussion, but as it stands now, you simply are not.
(idiota)
