Four dead in Navy Yard shooting

OldTrapper said:
Interesting how people like you never seek responsibility for your own actions, or that of your preferred party. No, you did not use the term "EO", or Executive Order. However, you did say "One of the first things Ol' Slick Willie did in 1993 upon coming into office was to disarm our soldiers on military bases." That is a lie since the change in ARMY Regulations was proposed before Clinton was even elected.

Spin it any way your demented mind wishes, it is your lie.
Click to expand...
The regulation was implemented in March of 1993 .... when Clinton was President. To present this fact in any other way would be "SPIN" ...
 
Werbung:
Texas_tea said:
The regulation was implemented in March of 1993 .... when Clinton was President. To present this fact in any other way would be "SPIN" ...
Click to expand...

LOL, now you say it was "implemented" under Clinton. Before it was

Texas_tea said:
The regulation was implemented in March of 1993 .... when Clinton was President. To present this fact in any other way would be "SPIN" ...
Click to expand...


LOL, now it is "implemented under Clinton". Before it was "One of the first things Ol' Slick Willie did in 1993 upon coming into office was to disarm our soldiers on military bases." as if Clinton was the one who actually did it. Then too, you chose to ignore that this regulation was promulgated under Bush41.

Now all you have to do is show what influence the President has upon military regulations. And when you then try to lay the blame at the feet of Clinton you will have to suggest that Bush41 requested such an action, which would then only compound your past lies.
 
It seems idiotic to me. If you go into a police station, are you threatened because the police are wearing a gun? Do the other employees feel threatened?

The Navy shooter, with all the other mass murderers, don't stop killing until someone with a gun shows up to shoot back at them.
 
Never let a crisis or memorial go to waste.

Let's stand on their caskets and give a political speech....makes for a great photo op too!

"See me", "gun control", see me, blah blah blah
 
Texas_tea said:
Right ....

Because more control is going to make us all safer from criminals with guns ....
Click to expand...
Dc and Chicago have very strict laws related to firesrms and yet people get shot there. So more laws will do anything that the old laws dont ? Of course not. At some point you have to entertain the thought that msybe its people you have problems with..
 
Werbung:
Texas_tea said:
It's people having guns "they" have a problem with. It's the 2nd Amendment "they" have a problem with. It's the US Constitution "they" have a problem with.
Click to expand...


Actually, you are too ignorant to know what the problem is:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...on-military-bases-and-its-not-clintons-fault/

So what’s the answer? It appears this “gun-free zone” type policy can actually be traced back to Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 5210.56, signed into effect in February 1992 by Donald J. Atwood, deputy secretary of defense under President George H.W. Bush.
 

Similar threads

GBFan
Ya Gotta Love The Logic ... Or The Lack of It
Replies
4
Views
1K
Texas_tea
Texas_tea
Little-Acorn
Authorities: 4 dead in shooting in rural Blair Country, PA
2
Replies
28
Views
4K
Openmind
Openmind
Little-Acorn
3 family members killed in Chicago suburb home invasion
2 3
Replies
31
Views
4K
Devil505
Devil505
Little-Acorn
1 student killed (so far), 4 wounded in Ohio high school shooting
Replies
6
Views
2K
pocketfullofshells
pocketfullofshells
GBFan
Shotgun Foils Home Invasion
2
Replies
27
Views
3K
Lagboltz
Lagboltz
Back
Top