Worship the system if you must.You and I have completely different views on "human suffering". I think the worst human suffering in the world has been caused by attempting to stamp out all human suffering.
The economy is not something that can be "fix" or prevented from causing problems.
What say we promise everyone a job, and promise everyone food, and promise everyone a home, and everyone health care even. Will that prevent all suffering? Perhaps in one sense, but then China had that and what was the result? 66% of the population lived under the poverty line, and the poverty line in China is 25 cents a day. But they all had food, shelter, health care, and a job. Is that how you wish to prevent human suffering?
Now, China no longer promises food to all citizens. No longer promises a home to all citizens. No longer promises a job to all citizens. Now only 3% of the population is under the poverty line.
So which way it better?
Even in this case, the changes in the Community Reinvestment Act, that drastically pushed for sub-prime loans, was for the purpose of easing "human suffering". What was the result? More human suffering than there was before, in the form of bankruptcy, foreclosure, screwed up credit reports for 7 years, not including debts they'll have to pay for years to come.
Not to mention Mark-to-Market which was to prevent Human suffering from companies like Enron. Instead they caused massive losses on the stock market the effect everyone's 401K, not to mention lost jobs from bankrupt companies.
In the end, the more we try to prevent all human suffering, the more human suffering we're going to cause.
I choose to respect and support the people the system is supposed to serve.
Anybody else?