GBFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2013
- Messages
- 1,455
See what I mean? One liberal takes a comment out of context ... and the others don't bother to ACTUALLY read it, they just pile on ... so now, we have a whole bunch of liberals who are wrong. Gotta love the mob mentality.
If you can find it in your dear little heart ... go back and look at the post. I asked Dawkinsrocks to look at the trends in several social and economic characteristics in NYC, compared to like data in Detroit, and show us that NYC trends aren't parallel to Detroit of the 90s. That's a simple mathematical process.
Dawkins - rather than actually researching the data, and showing us the divergence that disproves my position - claims that is trying to prove a negative and, therefore, is impossible. Then, you and the rest of the liberal posse, jump on board, and support his position - without bothering to actually understand what he was truly saying. I mean, after all, he's liberal, so he MUST be correct, right?
But, then, I guess I can't really expect liberals to do a mathematical analysis, can I? I mean ... after all, they're the ones that take healthcare insurance away from 8 million people, sign up 2.5 million contributing members (sign up an additional 3.5 million for free health insurance thru Medicaid), raise the average premium cost to 124% of the old average, increase the national average deductible by about 70%, (we won't even talk about co-pays), drive the average cost of healthcare insurance up in 25 out of 27 states, and then, have the temerity to call that success.
Clearly, mathematics and liberalism are diametrically opposed ... probably because one of them is inherently logical and the other isn't.
If you can find it in your dear little heart ... go back and look at the post. I asked Dawkinsrocks to look at the trends in several social and economic characteristics in NYC, compared to like data in Detroit, and show us that NYC trends aren't parallel to Detroit of the 90s. That's a simple mathematical process.
Dawkins - rather than actually researching the data, and showing us the divergence that disproves my position - claims that is trying to prove a negative and, therefore, is impossible. Then, you and the rest of the liberal posse, jump on board, and support his position - without bothering to actually understand what he was truly saying. I mean, after all, he's liberal, so he MUST be correct, right?
But, then, I guess I can't really expect liberals to do a mathematical analysis, can I? I mean ... after all, they're the ones that take healthcare insurance away from 8 million people, sign up 2.5 million contributing members (sign up an additional 3.5 million for free health insurance thru Medicaid), raise the average premium cost to 124% of the old average, increase the national average deductible by about 70%, (we won't even talk about co-pays), drive the average cost of healthcare insurance up in 25 out of 27 states, and then, have the temerity to call that success.
Clearly, mathematics and liberalism are diametrically opposed ... probably because one of them is inherently logical and the other isn't.
