Corps pay no taxes?

[Pandora]

Don't mean to start up a seperate conversation but you seem like you would have done some research in regards to Ron Pauls Policy stance when running for the government. Do have any you disagree on? I'm curoius how you feel about them and some actually insightful negatives since everyone I have ever mentioned this to only gives me slander and not actual negatives to his policies.

I will admit I am supporter of his but not without reservation.. as I have learn no one is perfect.

I am not personally for Ron Paul, but I have noticed that people get really uptight when someone says they are for Ron Paul. I dont get why but I have noticed people dont like it. Why do you think that is ?

 

[GenSeneca]

Don't mean to start up a seperate conversation but you seem like you would have done some research in regards to Ron Pauls Policy stance when running for the government. Do have any you disagree on? I'm curoius how you feel about them and some actually insightful negatives since everyone I have ever mentioned this to only gives me slander and not actual negatives to his policies.

I will admit I am supporter of his but not without reservation.. as I have learn no one is perfect.

Start a thread about Paul. I used to be a fan of his and I'd be glad to participate.

 

[Andy]

You see Dysfunc, now you have to listen to the venon of libs and he most likely thinks he's as conservative as Ronnie Raygun.

Why is labeling me so important to you? Is it because you have been programmed into having to reject anything that could be called social change or socialist policy?

How do you feel about your healthcare system or your sliding standard of living? What Ron Paul policies are going to fix those?

Allowing people to keep the money they rightfully earn will automatically bring up standard of living, and allow them to purchase the health insurance they want.

"Ronnie Raygun" defeated the socialist soviet union, and won the cold war. Further the military systems made fun of by the left, now are proven successes. The ICBM shield is being built, and we have been successful at shooting down mock incoming missiles.

The label maker himself is now labeled, and can't take it? Funny how leftist always say "do as I say, not as I do", and then normally follow it up with how everyone else is a hypocrite.

 

[Mr.Dysfunctional]

Start a thread about Paul. I used to be a fan of his and I'd be glad to participate.

THREAD POSTED!!! Comment my servants COMMENT MUHAHAH!!!!

 

[Mr.Dysfunctional]

Allowing people to keep the money they rightfully earn will automatically bring up standard of living, and allow them to purchase the health insurance they want.

"Ronnie Raygun" defeated the socialist soviet union, and won the cold war. Further the military systems made fun of by the left, now are proven successes. The ICBM shield is being built, and we have been successful at shooting down mock incoming missiles.

The label maker himself is now labeled, and can't take it? Funny how leftist always say "do as I say, not as I do", and then normally follow it up with how everyone else is a hypocrite.

To bad it took 20 years to fullfill its mission. As for everything else. RIGHT ON!!!!

 

[Federal Farmer]

Don't mean to start up a seperate conversation but you seem like you would have done some research in regards to Ron Pauls Policy stance when running for the government. Do have any you disagree on? I'm curoius how you feel about them and some actually insightful negatives since everyone I have ever mentioned this to only gives me slander and not actual negatives to his policies.

I will admit I am supporter of his but not without reservation.. as I have learn no one is perfect.

Don't take this the wrong way MD, but I don't have anything for Ron Paul. It may be a bit "short sighted" of me, but any Congressman who would stand up and say that OIF is "un-Constitutional" is, in my mind, a barking moonbat who needs to be hooded, and QUICKLY, before the guys with the nice white jackets come to take him away.

 

[Mr.Dysfunctional]

Don't take this the wrong way MD, but I don't have anything for Ron Paul. It may be a bit "short sighted" of me, but any Congressman who would stand up and say that OIF is "un-Constitutional" is, in my mind, a barking moonbat who needs to be hooded, and QUICKLY, before the guys with the nice white jackets come to take him away.

Well I can understand that if what I get for OIF = Operation Iraqi Freedom.

My only argument I could possibily think to debate that is that President Bush should have had congresses approval before thrusting us into an unprovoked war against and enemy who had no possibility of harming our National Security.

Did Sadam deserve to be outsed ... Yes.. But couldn't his own people have stood up for themselves and done anything ?!?!... We did put him into power but does that nessacarily mean we had to go clean up?

((P.S. if he had congressional approval... my appolgies.. but like I said.. only argument I think that rebutes))

 

[GenSeneca]

Well I can understand that if what I get for OIF = Operation Iraqi Freedom.

My only argument I could possibily think to debate that is that President Bush should have had congresses approval before thrusting us into an unprovoked war against and enemy who had no possibility of harming our National Security.

Did Sadam deserve to be outsed ... Yes.. But couldn't his own people have stood up for themselves and done anything ?!?!... We did put him into power but does that nessacarily mean we had to go clean up?

((P.S. if he had congressional approval... my appolgies.. but like I said.. only argument I think that rebutes))

1. Congress did approve OIF

2. We didn't put Saddam into power but we DID support him during the Iran/Iraq war... just enough so there would NOT be a clear winner and neither country was dominant in the region.

 

[Federal Farmer]

Well I can understand that if what I get for OIF = Operation Iraqi Freedom.

My only argument I could possibily think to debate that is that President Bush should have had congresses approval before thrusting us into an unprovoked war against and enemy who had no possibility of harming our National Security.

Did Sadam deserve to be outsed ... Yes.. But couldn't his own people have stood up for themselves and done anything ?!?!... We did put him into power but does that nessacarily mean we had to go clean up?

((P.S. if he had congressional approval... my appolgies.. but like I said.. only argument I think that rebutes))

Congressional approval was given, he just voted against it, and now he's playing sour grapes.

As far as "unprovoked" and "no possible threat", I suggest you re-read the 9-11 Commission Report, and pay particular attention to the part about Kuala Lumpur. On January 5, 2000, a "resident" of the Iraqi Embassy there was dispatched to collect 2 of the "soon to be" 9-11 hijackers at the airport and take them to their hotel, where they met with 2 other "soon to be" hijackers, and other members of the Hamburg Cell just 10 days before these "soon to be" hijackers entered the US.

Saddam was VERY much involved in at least supplying and supporting the 9-11 hijackers, and I'm sure that two Veterans like ourselves can agree that when you do something like that, it's fixing to suck to be you.

Also, we didn't put him into power, he did that all by himself (with a little help from his own people).