Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 15,079
If no evidence of fraud was presented to the judge then nobody can claim the judge looked and the evidence and ruled that it did not show fraud.
I'll repeat it again specifically for the benefit of the brain dead godbotherers. What they presented which is safe to assume is everything they had, was decided by the judges to NOT BE EVIDENCE of fraud.
What part of that simplicity do you not understand?
Democrats were not involved in any of that sordid affair so attempting them to link them is a very poor excuse.Trump's lawyer claimed he took money from the campaign? He should not have done that because that makes him responsible for the crime Democrats claim was committed.
That is not what I said. It was assumed by republicans also, that the acceptance of the money for a "business" just created by Jarrod was a dodgy deal. He had no experience in runnings of funds to that extent from one country alone. The Saudis questioned it also but assumed it would give them unfettered access to Trump, which it has because he loves dictators as we know, to do further dodgy deals.You claim the money the Saudis invested with Kushner proves Kushner was guilty of accepting bribes from Saudis. Are you claiming anyone who does business with the Saudis is crooked?
The money was quickly dispersed to this point it's trail has become very unclear.
Some financial sceptics suggest it was a direct bribe to the Trump family and they would disperse it.
Either way it's a perfect way to bribe a POTUS in another person's name.
It's not as if Jarrod is a well known expert in wall street.
But honestly, we know he's as bent as a $9 note because his history proves it. Why am I not surprised.
Time will tell us.