TruthAboveAll
Well-Known Member
So? Do you think this means the former claim isn't true? What evidence do you have that Ford had not renegotiated contracts prior to this?
Nov, 2007
So how about this accurate idea?
Really? Let's read together, eh?
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,25164914-36375,00.html
Interesting? So the Unions say they cut labor costs, Ford says they reduced labor costs, the news papers agree they cut labor costs...
But liberal idiots on the forum think it's something else.
Let's see... do I believe joe blow forum poster, who hasn't made a logical argument yet, or everyone else. This is a tough one....
Good posts, Andy. There is a lot to digest on the whole issue of auto sales and what has transpired over the past, well, several years really. Ford has been consistently been in the process of streamlining both their corporate structure and labor contracts. In addition, they've been focusing on fewer cars and jettisoning the garbage. They've been practicing a *GASP* good business model, and one that the employees, union and others alike appreciate. As a close friend who works for Ford told me, there are extremely few who would volunteer to trade places with their counterparts at GM or Chrysler.
One other issue on the C4C stats: the C4C was coupled with not just huge discounts for GM products, but cut rate financing. C4C was designed specifically to help GM. If there was any way that the Dems & Obama could have stipulated it up front, they would have. But in light of all the criticism of the Fed taking over automakers, going well beyond bail outs, it would have been an even more rapid kiss of death.
Oh, and I'm glad that you don't look to any type of confirmation from your naysayers here. Please, don't bother them with facts and details. I DO admire their spontaneous and perpetual creativity in developing different ways to make the truth fit their agenda.