Then so would GWB and Palin, who have actually been apart of socialist legislation. It is yet to be seen how much of a socialist Obama is. .
Well if you take obama on his word and record you don’t need to wait for anything unless you don’t believe his word. It seems reasonable to me that a person could be critical of another person’s political stance even if they had some similarities. I will use abortion for an example. There are many people who believe in abortion in the first 3 months but are totally against abortion in the 9th month and completely against denying a living child medical care after they are born even if they were a target for abortion. It does not seem reasonable to me to say well you are for abortion in the first three months so you can’t speak out against abortion in the 9th month.
Bush is a social conservative, but when it comes to spending and enlarging the government he is no conservative just less liberal on spending than anyone he ever ran against. From what I know Palin is more conservative than Bush is in all areas. I suppose anyone who would advocate for or defend the Social Security system could be counted as a socialist at least to some degree. But if you are trying to say that Obama is the same as Bush or Palin when it comes to being a socialist, sorry I am just not buying that. Not even close.
But they may both have some socialistic points of views in some areas, just not to the extreme that obama has. The way I am reading your reply is that they don’t have a right to speak out against a higher degree of socialism because they may have some socialistic tendencies? That would be no different than a person who is ok with abortion in the first 3 months not being able to speak out against abortion in the 9th month. That seems lame to me.
The point of the exercise is that when one spends a few months touring the country with nothing of value to add, but only to detract against her opponents as an attack dog, similar treatment seems to come back. I say this in regards to her ridicule about her answers to various very simple and straight forward questions. This certainly does not justify arson. .
I find this very funny since this is ALL that Biden was and all the lefties were so happy to have Biden named as VP because he is such a good attack dog, and he could do the attacks while letting the messiah stay above it all. Liberals in general can dish it out but they can not take it, not even a little bit.
In all fairness, there is no public indication at this point that this event was even politically motivated. I am taking a wait and see attitude about it. .
Yeah, I am sure it was just a fluke
You want to bring Joe the Plumber back into this? Give me a break, a single person who managed to corner a candidate in front of the media and then himself rode his 15minutes of fame into a brick wall.
Joe was a very good example of how no one can dare speak against “the one” and not pay a price. This is really funny….you defend what happened to him as though it’s ok. That’s fine maybe to you it is ok. To me and too many others it is not. This man has a right to say what he thinks without mindless drooling obama worshiping followers who work for government to get into his personal records and tell news reporters about it.
You have a right to talk bad about him and you have a right to try and drag Palin and her kids and family through mud, fire or what ever. But government agencies do not have a right to look into his personal records and release them just to defend the messiah. Liberals are hard to understand. They love to trash any republican or conservative they can with true news or fake it really doesn’t matter, but if anyone dares say anything even if its true about the messiah or any of his sleazy associates then its some thing bad and should be stopped.