America do not forget.

[pjmret]

No, that was not the reason most protesters were there on Jan 6. Most were there to challenge electors certifying an election with so much evidence of fraud still unchallenged and unanswered. When crooks commit voter fraud they rush to certify the fraudulent results before they can be stopped and when public opposition rises they assemble hosts of friendlies to support their lying claims that they did not commit raud. These dirty political tactics have been going on in the US for a long time.

Consider this crooked race in Chicago in 1939: The crooked Democrat stole the win and then had 37 of 43 city council members lie and and deny to cover his fraud for him.

CHICAGO POLITICS IN THE GRAND STYLE OF `PADDY` BAULER (chicagotribune.com)

Bauler ran in many tight races, but the 1939 campaign against Republican James B. Waller, which culminated with his infamous ''reform'' line, was one of the tightest-and dirtiest-of his career. After Bauler was declared the winner by a mere 243 votes, Waller charged fraud, bribery and intimidation of voters and demanded a recount. The City Council, however, voted 37 to 6 to dismiss Waller`s plea. ''It was a victory for the people,'' a happy Bauler said afterward.

evidence unchallenged? you morons had over SIXTY court cases, including up to scotus. you lost every one. duh
god you're stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

"stop the steal" was to prevent illegally biden from taking over. its exactly why they were there, *****. it was the name of the rally. duh.

god you're stupid. lol

Stop the steal was an appropriate call for voters to stop Democrats from using uninvestigated voter fraud to steal the 2020 election before the investigators had time to adequately piece together all the evidence. Congress addressed this same tactic used by Democrats when they stole the CA Dornan seat for Sanchez.

H. Rept. 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ105th Congress (1997-1998)

COMMITTEE REPORT

Report Type:	House Report
Accompanies:	H.Res.355
Committees:	House Oversight Committee

10\ Ms. Sanchez alleges that the Notice of Contest was not timely filed with the Clerk of the House on December 26, 1996.

The Minority sought immediate dismissal without any investigation or hearing. This position comports with the traditional Democratic reluctance to investigate vote fraud.

This Task Force also recognized however, that the proof of election irregularities or fraud may not be obtainable by a contestant who has not had access to discovery. Contestants who cannot fully support their credible allegations because the proof of their claims is in the hands or minds of those who have committed the errors or violations at issue 18 should not be penalized.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\18\ The standard also recognizes the fact that Contestants may not have had sufficient time to review election materials such as registration lists, poll sheets, absentee ballot forms, etc. which might form the basis of allegations of irregularities by the deadline
for filing a contest. In some cases, this problem might be due to the unavailability of the materials, or their sheer volume.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Republicans have consistently rejected the Democratic position that the Contestant must be able to provide specific
preliminary proof of his or her case at the time of the filing of the Notice of Contest in order to survive a Motion to
Dismiss 19 before any discovery can begin or before a hearing on the merits can be set. The Democratic standard
incorrectly elevated the Motion to Dismiss stage to an insurmountable barrier to all election contestants.

 

[pjmret]

Stop the steal was an appropriate call for voters to stop Democrats from using uninvestigated voter fraud to steal the 2020 election before the investigators had time to adequately piece together all the evidence. Congress addressed this same tactic used by Democrats when they stole the CA Dornan seat for Sanchez.

H. Rept. 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ105th Congress (1997-1998)

COMMITTEE REPORT

Report Type:	House Report
Accompanies:	H.Res.355
Committees:	House Oversight Committee

10\ Ms. Sanchez alleges that the Notice of Contest was not timely filed with the Clerk of the House on December 26, 1996.

The Minority sought immediate dismissal without any investigation or hearing. This position comports with the traditional Democratic reluctance to investigate vote fraud.

This Task Force also recognized however, that the proof of election irregularities or fraud may not be obtainable by a contestant who has not had access to discovery. Contestants who cannot fully support their credible allegations because the proof of their claims is in the hands or minds of those who have committed the errors or violations at issue 18 should not be penalized.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\18\ The standard also recognizes the fact that Contestants may not have had sufficient time to review election materials such as registration lists, poll sheets, absentee ballot forms, etc. which might form the basis of allegations of irregularities by the deadline
for filing a contest. In some cases, this problem might be due to the unavailability of the materials, or their sheer volume.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Republicans have consistently rejected the Democratic position that the Contestant must be able to provide specific
preliminary proof of his or her case at the time of the filing of the Notice of Contest in order to survive a Motion to
Dismiss 19 before any discovery can begin or before a hearing on the merits can be set. The Democratic standard
incorrectly elevated the Motion to Dismiss stage to an insurmountable barrier to all election contestants.

plenty of investigations *****. lol

which is why every state, including red states, certified their votes, *****.

god you're stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

evidence unchallenged? you morons had over SIXTY court cases, including up to scotus. you lost every one. duh
god you're stupid. lol

Sixty fraud cases thrown out by judges whose jobs depended on them throwing out fraud cases without a court trial.

 

[pjmret]

Sixty fraud cases thrown out by judges whose jobs depended on them throwing out fraud cases without a court trial.

nope, their jobs did not depend on that, *****.
unless you can prove it?

of course you can't you're just a fake lying christian who is going to burn in hell lol

you know they had court trials, right, *****? that's how they work, the evidence is presented and the judge rules. duh

you make regular morons look smart.

 

[mark francis]

plenty of investigations *****. lol

which is why every state, including red states, certified their votes, *****.

god you're stupid. lol

Congress uncovered less than a thousand illegal votes in the 1996 Sanchez voting fraud case, but stopped short of investigating the tens of thousands of cases they admitted were likely.

 

[pjmret]

Congress uncovered less than a thousand illegal votes in the 1996 Sanchez voting fraud case, but stopped short of investigating the tens of thousands of cases they admitted were likely.

and? lol.

you morons have had over 2 YEARS and have found..nothing. lol

 

[mark francis]

nope, their jobs did not depend on that, *****.
unless you can prove it?

We have already looked at one Trump-hating, die-hard Democrat judge who refused to look at voter fraud evidence or rule on its accuracy, but nobody can prove the dozens of judges were fair or unfair. However, Democrats have a long history of electing crooked judges who will in turn protect them from criminal charges if they arise.

Ex-Democratic congressman sentenced to prison in yearslong Pennsylvania election fraud scheme | CNN Politics

Prosecutors said some of the candidates were running to be judges and had hired Myers, who would use portions of “consulting fees” from his clients to pay others to interfere with election results.

 

[pjmret]

We have already looked at one Trump-hating, die-hard Democrat judge who refused to look at voter fraud evidence or rule on its accuracy, but nobody can prove the dozens of judges were fair or unfair. However, Democrats have a long history of electing crooked judges who will in turn protect them from criminal charges if they arise.

Ex-Democratic congressman sentenced to prison in yearslong Pennsylvania election fraud scheme | CNN Politics

Prosecutors said some of the candidates were running to be judges and had hired Myers, who would use portions of “consulting fees” from his clients to pay others to interfere with election results.

of course these judges included republicans, some trump appointed, *****.

not one of them thought your evidence was credible. duh

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats keep close ties with Wall Street financiers while throwing bones to their ignorant poor voters, claiming they will make the rich pay for their greed and oppression of the poor, which is a ridiculous lie.

View attachment 5411

Pure bullshit.
You can't handle the truth because you lied and supported a lying idiot and still do. Suck eggs godbotherer.

 

[mark francis]

and? lol.

you morons have had over 2 YEARS and have found..nothing. lol

We have not yet uncovered the gold mine of massive Democrat fraud because Democrats have been successful in controlling access to Dominion machines in order to ensure no fraud is uncovered in those machines. Democrats deny they are protecting suspect machines from investigators, but they certainly cannot prove that dishonest claim.

Officials raised concerns for years about security of U.S. voting machines, software systems | National | thecentersquare.com

Officials raised concerns for years about security of U.S. voting machines, software systems

By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square

Nov 7, 2020

A sample ballot is shown using the Dominion Voting system Georgia will use Monday, Sept. 16, 2019, in Atlanta, Ga.

(The Center Square) – The Dominion Voting Systems, which has been used in multiple states where fraud has been alleged in the 2020 U.S. Election, was rejected three times by data communications experts from the Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Office for failing to meet basic security standards.

Unlike Texas, other states certified the use of the system, including Pennsylvania, where voter fraud has been alleged on multiple counts this week.

 

[pjmret]

We have not yet uncovered the gold mine of massive Democrat fraud because Democrats have been successful in controlling access to Dominion machines in order to ensure no fraud is uncovered in those machines. Democrats deny they are protecting suspect machines from investigators, but they certainly cannot prove that dishonest claim.

Officials raised concerns for years about security of U.S. voting machines, software systems | National | thecentersquare.com

Officials raised concerns for years about security of U.S. voting machines, software systems

By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square

Nov 7, 2020

A sample ballot is shown using the Dominion Voting system Georgia will use Monday, Sept. 16, 2019, in Atlanta, Ga.

(The Center Square) – The Dominion Voting Systems, which has been used in multiple states where fraud has been alleged in the 2020 U.S. Election, was rejected three times by data communications experts from the Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Office for failing to meet basic security standards.

Unlike Texas, other states certified the use of the system, including Pennsylvania, where voter fraud has been alleged on multiple counts this week.

weird, democrats have stopped you in red states?

do you enjoy looking stupid. i hope you do, because..you do look stupid. lol

 

[pjmret]

We have not yet uncovered the gold mine of massive Democrat fraud because Democrats have been successful in controlling access to Dominion machines in order to ensure no fraud is uncovered in those machines. Democrats deny they are protecting suspect machines from investigators, but they certainly cannot prove that dishonest claim.

Officials raised concerns for years about security of U.S. voting machines, software systems | National | thecentersquare.com

Officials raised concerns for years about security of U.S. voting machines, software systems

By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square

Nov 7, 2020

A sample ballot is shown using the Dominion Voting system Georgia will use Monday, Sept. 16, 2019, in Atlanta, Ga.

(The Center Square) – The Dominion Voting Systems, which has been used in multiple states where fraud has been alleged in the 2020 U.S. Election, was rejected three times by data communications experts from the Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Office for failing to meet basic security standards.

Unlike Texas, other states certified the use of the system, including Pennsylvania, where voter fraud has been alleged on multiple counts this week.

you morons have failed for over 2 years. lol.

you are true morons.

 

[mark francis]

of course these judges included republicans, some trump appointed, *****.

not one of them thought your evidence was credible. duh

They proved nothing about the evidence but showed no interest in examining the evidence in court. Perhaps most of them felt like questioning the election at this time would endanger America as a nation regardless of whether the fraud was real or not. That is why serious investigations into the theft of the 1960 presidential election were stymied.

Was Nixon Robbed? (slate.com)

Was Nixon Robbed?

The legend of the stolen 1960 presidential election.

“You gotta swallow this one,” says a Republican hack in Oliver Stone’s Nixon, referring to the 1960 election, in which John F. Kennedy prevailed. “They stole it fair and square.”

The GOP’s failure to prove fraud doesn’t mean, of course, that the election was clean. That question remains unsolved and unsolvable.
On the other hand, some fraud clearly occurred in Cook County. At least three people were sent to jail for election-related crimes, and 677 others were indicted before being acquitted by Judge John M. Karns, a Daley crony. Many of the allegations involved practices that wouldn’t be detected by a recount, leading the conservative Chicago Tribune, among others, to conclude that “once an election has been stolen in Cook County, it stays stolen.” What’s more, according to journalist Seymour Hersh, a former Justice Department prosecutor who heard tapes of FBI wiretaps from the period believed that Illinois was rightfully Nixon’s. Hersh also has written that J. Edgar Hoover believed Nixon actually won the presidency but in deciding to follow normal procedures and refer the FBI’s findings to the attorney general—as of Jan. 20, 1961, Robert F. Kennedy—he effectively buried the case.

 

[pjmret]

They proved nothing about the evidence but showed no interest in examining the evidence in court. Perhaps most of them felt like questioning the election at this time would endanger America as a nation regardless of whether the fraud was real or not. That is why serious investigations into the theft of the 1960 presidential election were stymied.

Was Nixon Robbed? (slate.com)

Was Nixon Robbed?

The legend of the stolen 1960 presidential election.

“You gotta swallow this one,” says a Republican hack in Oliver Stone’s Nixon, referring to the 1960 election, in which John F. Kennedy prevailed. “They stole it fair and square.”

The GOP’s failure to prove fraud doesn’t mean, of course, that the election was clean. That question remains unsolved and unsolvable.
On the other hand, some fraud clearly occurred in Cook County. At least three people were sent to jail for election-related crimes, and 677 others were indicted before being acquitted by Judge John M. Karns, a Daley crony. Many of the allegations involved practices that wouldn’t be detected by a recount, leading the conservative Chicago Tribune, among others, to conclude that “once an election has been stolen in Cook County, it stays stolen.” What’s more, according to journalist Seymour Hersh, a former Justice Department prosecutor who heard tapes of FBI wiretaps from the period believed that Illinois was rightfully Nixon’s. Hersh also has written that J. Edgar Hoover believed Nixon actually won the presidency but in deciding to follow normal procedures and refer the FBI’s findings to the attorney general—as of Jan. 20, 1961, Robert F. Kennedy—he effectively buried the case.

of course they examined it. that is their job, *****, and then they ruled.

you're a legal *****. lol