A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

[7forever]

IronClad wrote:
The same moment in time is shown in the "nose out" clip viewed from the west and the "nose out" viewed from the east. It's cleverly done but the superimposed "plane in" with the "plane out" [west view] is to divert us away from the east view which remarkably looks like a "missile out". If nothing flew into the ST then they'd want to show us something coming out, wouldn't they.

In the thumbnail graphics above on the left, if you line up the explosion along the east wall and the starboard wingless plane going in they don't line up. A wingless plane is to keep you thinking of a flying object that flew into the tower. If nothing did then they keep you thinking something did. Even a missile is better than nothing.
Someone coined the phrase "hunt the boeing" relating to the Pentagon. This is what everyone has been doing for 10 years in Manhattan. Hunting the boeing. You'd think someone would have found it by now.

Not so. The lady in the second live clip describes it as maybe being a police helicopter which corroborates what's seen in both live clips even though they are both coming from the same direction but at different angles. The orb is not a red herring if that's what you're thinking.

 

[Openmind]

Lol. The mantra of the social progressive and tolerant. "WE HATE".

But they sure expect everyone else to care about them and their "girlfriends".

A very interesting statement coming from the official bully in this forum!

 

[7forever]

It took this long to make this gif because gifsoup is a pos. It is clear why she didn't identify it as definitely being a helicopter because it has no propeller, therefore was not a helicopter, plane, or missile of any known kind. The only people who would know are ones with top secret clearance. Notice how slow it moves and the lapse of time between when it's hidden and the explosion. It circles the building as Matt Lauer described, leading to the likely conclusion that it really exploded on the east, not southeast side. The shape, size, and slow movement aren't anything like the digi-plane.

9/11 South Tower Strike WB11 Live (WPIX) - YouTube

 

[7forever]

The east view proves a fake plane was added into west view

The plane does not pass through the open skyline before it comes into view which proves a fake plane was added.

The east view shows the fake plane traveling straight north for 9 seconds, which debunks the official divebomb myth and is clearly seen passing through the skyline, unlike the clip that was released three years ago. The last building it passes may be the same that it magically appears from behind in the west view.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsWRDHE42gs&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=15

Advance this clip to 4:00 or before and see the plane created out of thin air from behind the building just right of the open and unobstructed skyline. I started this gif two seconds before it appears from behind the building. A real plane would be seen passing through the clear sky just like it does from the east view. This is human error. It is not possible to cover up something of this magnitude unless everyone got together beforehand, which obviously did not happen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddGXuy0ep7g

Tuesday, Nov 11, 2008 The FBI and the Department of Justice have released ten new videos relating to the events of 9/11, three years after a freedom of information act request for the footage was submitted.

 

[7forever]

A very interesting statement coming from the official bully in this forum!

Just another denialist.

 

[7forever]

The timing of the divebomber myth and chopper 4 orb are off by three seconds.

They are traveling in different directions with the orb being well west of the divebomber. Several local and big TV lizard reporters described the orb as a commercial plane. Shout outs go to the BBC and spooked helicopter lady.

2nd hit CBS Divebomber on BBC - YouTube
9/11 footage Chopper 4 HQ - YouTube

 

[7forever]

Do you have enough cognitive ability to answer questions?
How did they photoshop an airplane into the sky in front of over 100,000 people?
I find it more likely that you photoshopped the aircraft out of the videos.

Bart, do you have enough cognitive ability to answer questions?
How does a commercial jet not appear in 2 live footage clips when both reporters were clearly shocked at not seeing the plane that they were supposed to be seeing? I find it very obvious that the government and media photoshopped the aircraft into countless amateur videos.

 

[7forever]

The eternal destruction of failed stupidity

Some desperate goofer tried to prove the fake plane real and found this footage showing what's supposed to be a plane from the wide western view. This apparently is from the same youtube account but was uploaded closer to when those videos were released under FOIA.

It first appears as some faint grey thing and quickly morphs into a horribly fake black plane in the following 8 seconds. It doesn't get much better than this. Never try to prove a negative because you'll always lose and provide the truth more weight in evidence.

Second Plane Hitting the WTC - YouTube

 

[7forever]

The fake planes were facing different directions only seconds before impact. Nothing can change where they were during fake news footage. No 3D view or different camera angles change that two different flight paths were shown on TV. The plane theory falls apart on that alone. The wide angle has it traveling straight and it's irrelevant if it was exactly, only north. The following are all different flight paths.

Divebomb myth is going northeast and a little west before fake impact.LOL

The wide angle does not divebomb but goes straight north into the south facing of T2.

The orb travels east and a little north causing the explosion in the live footage that can never be challenged.

 

[7forever]

No plane was captured in two surviving live clips and that's proven conclusive by neither lady mentioning a jumbo jet approaching the towers. They are the best witnesses because it was filmed live, before, during, and after the explosion. Their initial reactions prove the footage is legit showing an unknown flying object..

 

[7forever]

About a UFO being involved?? C'mon. YOU don't believe that do you? I mean, you do concede that planes hit the towers, don't you?

An UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT is exactly what exploded Tower 2. Not a flying saucer with aliens. It would not make one bit of difference if those women changed their stories today. What they said in those moments 10 years ago is corroborated by the footage showing an unknown aircraft going behind the buildings and exploding the south tower.

9/11 South Tower Strike WB11 Live (WPIX) - YouTube

 

[7forever]

The plane was not flown by poorly trained Arabs on a mission from Osama bin Laden because they “hate our freedoms”. In fact, there was nobody on board that plane at all.

Quotes from Flight Instructors:

Mohammed Atta: “His attention span was zero.”
Khalid Al-Mihdhar: “We didn’t kick him out, but he didn’t live up to our standards.”
Marwan Al-Shehhi: “He was dropped because of his limited English and incompetence at the controls.”
Salem Al-Hazmi: “We advised him to quit after two lessons.”
Hani Hanjour: “His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”

http://911anomalies.wordpress.com/

 

[dogtowner]

You never tire of talking to yourself do you ?

 

[GenSeneca]

You never tire of talking to yourself do you ?

No one else will listen to this 9/11 nuttery.

 

[7forever]

You never tire of talking to yourself do you ?

I never tire of posting relevant info that many are definitely reading.