6000 years?

If you are going to use DNA to trach human ancestry back to dumb animals, then you must explain how humans cannot have gotten the DNA of animals without having gotten it in the blood.
Via reproductive cells. That's how dna is passed on, not by blood, science moron
 
Werbung:
Apes and homo sapiens have a common ancestor that is almost certainly extinct. Where do you get this "blood related" nonsense?
Of course, theists believe that humans have souls and animals do not. Well, perhaps except the folks that insist that All dogs go to Heaven.

There is no way to prove that any organism has a soul. Souls are rather like time travel: they are ever so useful as narrative devices.

I find it amusing that although the Biblical character known as "God" has been constantly disappointed in human behavior, humans have been quite successful in making dogs through breeding into whatever they wish them to be: guardians, companions, shepherds, defenders of food, and both hideously ugly and extremely ornamental. Have humans taken free will away from canines? I see no evidence of it. There is no doubt that a dog can be far more loyal to his owner than humans can be to "God".
When did humans supposedly start bleeding red? After evolution split animals and plants or after humans first evolved from black beasts in Africa?
 
When did humans supposedly start bleeding red? After evolution split animals and plants or after humans first evolved from black beasts in Africa?
Blood is red because it contains hemoglobin. Red blood is typical of mammals. reptiles, birds and fish.

Humans bled red since they came into existence. They have never bled blood of any other color.
 
Blood is red because it contains hemoglobin. Red blood is typical of mammals. reptiles, birds and fish.

Humans bled red since they came into existence. They have never bled blood of any other color.
How did animals evolve to bleed blood after their alleged evolutionary split from plants? Did the genome just happen to accidentally, miraculously, and mysteriously gain new genetic info after billions of years?
 
DNA is not passed on in red or blue blood cells? Is it in the thoughts of the mind and not in the blood?
You are barking mad. Where's you evidence of that?
When a sperm and egg combine during fertilisation, they form a single cell (zygote) that contains the full set of 46 chromosomes, 23 from each parent. This single cell divides many times during a person's growth and development, with each new cell containing a complete copy of the genome.
 
You are barking mad. Where's you evidence of that?
When a sperm and egg combine during fertilisation, they form a single cell (zygote) that contains the full set of 46 chromosomes, 23 from each parent. This single cell divides many times during a person's growth and development, with each new cell containing a complete copy of the genome.
How many generations back in time can we find the genetic information for humans being carried by the genetic code of ancient ancestors of supposedly 'lower forms?' Why is there such a diversity of chromosome counts across nature if we all =descended from a 'single celled' creature?
 
dna is passed on by reproductive cells. that's what they do.
god you are a science moron. lol
Are you saying the blood of apes was never passed down to their offspring or are you saying that humans are not offspring of apes?
 
How many generations back in time can we find the genetic information for humans being carried by the genetic code of ancient ancestors of supposedly 'lower forms?' Why is there such a diversity of chromosome counts across nature if we all =descended from a 'single celled' creature?
Mutation, science moron
 
Are you saying the blood of apes was never passed down to their offspring or are you saying that humans are not offspring of apes?
I am saying dna is passed on by reproductive cells, science moron, which was your q duh
As I havevsaid several times already
 
How many generations back in time can we find the genetic information for humans being carried by the genetic code of ancient ancestors of supposedly 'lower forms?' Why is there such a diversity of chromosome counts across nature if we all =descended from a 'single celled' creature?
That is evolution. Isn't it wonderful?
You won't find those answers in the Bible.
 
Werbung:
How many generations back in time can we find the genetic information for humans being carried by the genetic code of ancient ancestors of supposedly 'lower forms?' Why is there such a diversity of chromosome counts across nature if we all =descended from a 'single celled' creature?
Well, great apes and humans have the same number of chromosomes, 23 pairs, or 46.
The number of chromosomes is not related to what we consider greater sophistication of development. \\
 
Back
Top