18 State AG investigating Anthony Fauci.....

Starcastle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
2,422
Location
Tennessee
Led by the Attorney general of South Carolina they have commenced an investigation into Anthony Fauci's lies and activities during the Covid crisis.

17 other AGs have signed this letter.

Key Findings from the Congressional Report:

  • Origins of COVID-19 – Evidence suggests Dr. Fauci worked to discredit the “lab leak” theory despite mounting evidence supporting it.
  • Misleading Congress on NIH Funding – Dr. Fauci allegedly provided false testimony regarding NIH-funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
  • NIH Oversight Failures – The NIH reportedly mismanaged taxpayer funds by failing to properly oversee grants to EcoHealth Alliance, which funneled funding to the Wuhan lab.
  • Suppression of Scientific Dissent – Prominent scientists who raised concerns about vaccine risks were allegedly silenced, limiting public awareness of potential side effects.
 
Werbung:
Fauci is proof of how hypocritical you libtards are. You say it is about the science but he worked to shut down scientists whose research contradicted him and the political agenda of the democrats. It was never about science or keeping people safe.

They assaulted our liberty. They used government force to keep people out of work. keep kids out of school and to keep people from going to church, going to exercise. Even healthy out door activities were banned.
 
Remember I started a thread where I mentioned a very under reported number. In the industrialized world the average age of those who died from Covid is the same or similar to life expectancy.

78 in the USA. 80 in Germany. 84 in Canada.

In Japan almost 40% of those who died from Covid were 90 and older!

It was all a fraud. Kids never needed to be kept out of school. Gyms did not need to be closed. Outdoor activities did not need to be banned. Fauci was at the center of all this fraud.
 
Speaking of science

read this...if you can...

"Since the first reports of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronavirus in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, there has been intense interest in understanding how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in the human population. Recent debate has coalesced around two competing ideas: a “laboratory escape” scenario and zoonotic emergence. Here, we critically review the current scientific evidence that may help clarify the origin of SARS-CoV-2.

Coronaviruses have long been known to present a high pandemic risk. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the ninth documented coronavirus that infects humans and the seventh identified in the last 20 years (Lednicky et al., 2021; Vlasova et al., 2021). All previous human coronaviruses have zoonotic origins, as have the vast majority of human viruses.

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 bears several signatures of these prior zoonotic events. It displays clear similarities to SARS-CoV that spilled over into humans in Foshan, Guangdong province, China in November 2002, and again in Guangzhou, Guangdong province in 2003 (Xu et al., 2004). Both these SARS-CoV emergence events were associated with markets selling live animals and involved species, particularly civets and raccoon dogs (Guan et al., 2003), that were also sold live in Wuhan markets in 2019 (Xiao et al., 2021) and are known to be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Freuling et al., 2020).

Animal traders working in 2003, without a SARS diagnosis, were documented to have high levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to SARS-CoV (13% overall and >50% for traders specializing in civets) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003). Subsequent serological surveys found ∼3% positivity rates to SARS-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoV) in residents of Yunnan province living close to bat caves (Wang et al., 2018), demonstrating regular exposure in rural locations.

The closest known relatives to both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are viruses from bats in Yunnan, although animals from this province have been preferentially sampled. For both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, there is a considerable geographic gap between Yunnan and the location of the first human cases, highlighting the difficulty in identifying the exact pathway of virus emergence and the importance of sampling beyond Yunnan."

more at https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373617/

comrade stalin
moscow
 
Werbung:
more ...

There is currently no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has a laboratory origin. There is no evidence that any early cases had any connection to the WIV, in contrast to the clear epidemiological links to animal markets in Wuhan, nor evidence that the WIV possessed or worked on a progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 prior to the pandemic. The suspicion that SARS-CoV-2 might have a laboratory origin stems from the coincidence that it was first detected in a city that houses a major virological laboratory that studies coronaviruses. Wuhan is the largest city in central China with multiple animal markets and is a major hub for travel and commerce, well connected to other areas both within China and internationally. The link to Wuhan therefore more likely reflects the fact that pathogens often require heavily populated areas to become established (Pekar et al., 2021).


We contend that although the animal reservoir for SARS-CoV-2 has not been identified and the key species may not have been tested, in contrast to other scenarios there is substantial body of scientific evidence supporting a zoonotic origin. Although the possibility of a laboratory accident cannot be entirely dismissed, and may be near impossible to falsify, this conduit for emergence is highly unlikely relative to the numerous and repeated human-animal contacts that occur routinely in the wildlife trade. Failure to comprehensively investigate the zoonotic origin through collaborative and carefully coordinated studies would leave the world vulnerable to future pandemics arising from the same human activities that have repeatedly put us on a collision course with novel viruses.

ibid

Given the maga cult hatred for the success of china compared to the slow-motion collapse of us society,, it is no surprise that these
cultists have seized on what is basically a non-political issue and turned it into a political controversy posturing as a scientific one.

Fauci is a hero for standing up to the complete fool in the white house and saving millions of american lives.

The maga cult is a deadly virus.

comrade stalin
moscow
 
Back
Top