Will AMERICA survive Obama ???

[Boris Norris]

You are right. Democrats don't have to prove anything because they stole the power and now can do whatever wicked or unlawful thing they like and to hell or to jail with those who object.


View attachment 9032

That's fine with me. After all Trump has said that about his opponents

 

[Phoenix68]

Will AMERICA survive Obama ???​

.

.​

 

[pjmret]

What court case? Speeding tickets? Court cases that were hastily thrown together just days after the election before reasonable investigations had even begun? You keep mentioning court cases as if you think court cases somehow prove democrats did not commit massive voter fraud, which false assumption about courts is ludicrous.

the 61 court cases you losers lost in multiple states and the federal level, including scotus.

its hard to lose that many in a row, but you losers managed it. lol

 

[pjmret]

So? Courts have not disproven the evidence of fraud and you confirm that you also believe courts cannot do that. Who has been uncovering fraud and jailing crooks for committing fraud for more than 100 years in the US? Honest law enforcement officials and responsible investigators. Who among leftists and the ignorant masses advocated the evidence of 2020 fraud be investigated? Quite a few Republicans but practically no Democrats. If Democrats did commit massive fraud as the evidence suggests then they would not want anybody investigating the reports of fraud. That is what we have seen.

If Democrats truly believed little or no fraud had occurred, they would have been knocking down the doors of law enforcement demanding investigations, knowing the investigations would prove they did not commit the fraud that republicans said the evidence shows that they did.

nah, dems know that republicans are so stupid nothing will convince them, so they wisely don't waste their time on morons.

 

[mark francis]

the 61 court cases you losers lost in multiple states and the federal level, including scotus.

its hard to lose that many in a row, but you losers managed it. lol

Again, you show your ignorance or attempt to deceive by claiming courts disproved the evidence of voter fraud. You know no court ever disproved evidence of voting fraud, so you are being dishonest.

 

[mark francis]

nah, dems know that republicans are so stupid nothing will convince them, so they wisely don't waste their time on morons.

Democrats only think Americans are too stupid to see voting fraud crimes or government health tax scams when they see them.

 

[pjmret]

Again, you show your ignorance or attempt to deceive by claiming courts disproved the evidence of voter fraud. You know no court ever disproved evidence of voting fraud, so you are being dishonest.

i didn't claim that.
you are such a liar. lol.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats only think Americans are too stupid to see voting fraud crimes or government health tax scams when they see them.

View attachment 9041


View attachment 9042

i know you are stupid, does that help?

 

[mark francis]

i didn't claim that.
you are such a liar. lol.

What point were you trying to make if not to suggest this claim disproves voting fraud evidence?

the 61 court cases you losers lost in multiple states and the federal level, including scotus.

 

[pjmret]

What point were you trying to make if not to suggest this claim disproves voting fraud evidence?

the 61 court cases you losers lost in multiple states and the federal level, including scotus.

It is to suggest that your so-called evidence is not credible which I've told you many times but you appear too stupid to understand

 

[mark francis]

It is to suggest that your so-called evidence is not credible which I've told you many times but you appear too stupid to understand

You are not making sense. if courts did not examine the evidence thoroughly to determine whether the evidence was credible or not then how can court dismissals of voter fraud cases prove the evidence is not credible? Did any judge in the US forensically examine questionable voting machines that almost everybody admitted were subject to corrupt manipulation? No.

 

[pjmret]

You are not making sense. if courts did not examine the evidence thoroughly to determine whether the evidence was credible or not then how can court dismissals of voter fraud cases prove the evidence is not credible? Did any judge in the US forensically examine questionable voting machines that almost everybody admitted were subject to corrupt manipulation? No.

they did examine the evidence.
you're a legal moron.

 

[Boris Norris]

You are not making sense. if courts did not examine the evidence thoroughly to determine whether the evidence was credible or not then how can court dismissals of voter fraud cases prove the evidence is not credible? Did any judge in the US forensically examine questionable voting machines that almost everybody admitted were subject to corrupt manipulation? No.

Do you believe it is a judges job to examine voting machines?
Not one of recognition admitted they were faulty except dumb arse godbothering republicans like you.

Fox now know they peddled bullshit but you have information they didn't. Yeah sure you have. You've also got no brains.

 

[mark francis]

they did examine the evidence.
you're a legal moron.

They did? Courts examined suspect voting machines and found they had not been tampered with? I do not believe that.

 

[pjmret]

They did? Courts examined suspect voting machines and found they had not been tampered with? I do not believe that.

they examined the evidence that was given to them.
if moron republicans failed to give relevant evidence then they are morons.
sorry if you don't like reality.