When the issue is government, size matters, and bigger is not better.

dogtowner

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
17,849
Location
Wandering around
good read

another new study showing the retarding effect of big govt on GDP
not that this a surprise to many but it should be significant to some that this looks at a number of countries over two decades.

Govt-v-growth-CPS-study-300x197.jpg
 
Werbung:
Of course big government means less prosperity. That is a no brainer for some of us.

Sadly, there are many who do not know this or dispute it and many of these 'idiots' are in the Senate. 83 of whom voted against Rand Paul's balanced budget including many Rs and of course, all the Ds...how is it they can be sooooooooooooo partisan and the MSM fails to report it??? duh!
http://www.redstate.com/conservativerock5/2012/05/16/senate-votes-down-5-year-balanced-budget-plan/

Our political class refuses to see the danger ahead and is taking us over the cliff.

Does anyone think Romney is any different?
 
Of course big government means less prosperity. That is a no brainer for some of us.

Sadly, there are many who do not know this or dispute it and many of these 'idiots' are in the Senate. 83 of whom voted against Rand Paul's balanced budget including many Rs and of course, all the Ds...how is it they can be sooooooooooooo partisan and the MSM fails to report it??? duh!
http://www.redstate.com/conservativerock5/2012/05/16/senate-votes-down-5-year-balanced-budget-plan/

Our political class refuses to see the danger ahead and is taking us over the cliff.

Does anyone think Romney is any different?

yeah, he's rich enough and worked hard enough to not want to see it vanish. Obama never worked and assumes he can escape it somehow. kind of like surviving a nuclear winter.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top