So much for Donny's immunity.

[Boris Norris]

Should this decision tell any Republican anything?
No one in their right mind could entertain the thought because Trump said he should be immuned, he would get away with it.
There is no alternative for the SC, if he appeals, to confirm the previous decision. That aside, if even one SC judge disagrees, there's something seriously wrong with the legal system and the constitution.

 

[Boris Norris]

Should this decision tell any Republican anything?
No one in their right mind could entertain the thought because Trump said he should be immuned, he would get away with it.
There is no alternative for the SC, if he appeals, to confirm the previous decision. That aside, if even one SC judge disagrees, there's something seriously wrong with the legal system and the constitution.

Here's a bit more from MSNBC. You won't like it and ridicule the source but I'd rather you proved it wrong.

 

[mark francis]

Should this decision tell any Republican anything?
No one in their right mind could entertain the thought because Trump said he should be immuned, he would get away with it.
There is no alternative for the SC, if he appeals, to confirm the previous decision. That aside, if even one SC judge disagrees, there's something seriously wrong with the legal system and the constitution.

Government officials in high places turned a blind eye to the disgraceful illegal Trump impeachment conducted totally by Trump hating politicians after denying him every right in the Constitution and suspending due process so they could pretend their lynching was legal. I have no respect for Justice Roberts either for disallowing Senators to ask pertinent questions of the Democrat inquisitors that Roberts claimed was to p[rotect the identity of the whistleblower. What made that whole thing so stupid is that it has long been illegal to use anonymous testimony against a defendant who has not been allowed to call witnesses in the politically corrupted kangaroo court show trial.

When Vindman admitted later that he had lied to Congress about the phone call and about being the whistleblower, he proved all the dogs seeking to nail Trump on the false allegation were incompetent, biased, or fools.

 

[Boris Norris]

Government officials in high places turned a blind eye to the disgraceful illegal Trump impeachment conducted totally by Trump hating politicians after denying him every right in the Constitution and suspending due process so they could pretend their lynching was legal. I have no respect for Justice Roberts either for disallowing Senators to ask pertinent questions of the Democrat inquisitors that Roberts claimed was to p[rotect the identity of the whistleblower. What made that whole thing so stupid is that it has long been illegal to use anonymous testimony against a defendant who has not been allowed to call witnesses in the politically corrupted kangaroo court show trial.

When Vindman admitted later that he had lied to Congress about the phone call and about being the whistleblower, he proved all the dogs seeking to nail Trump on the false allegation were incompetent, biased, or fools.

In fact, the phone call was recorded, Johnston confirmed it. There was nothing fake about his impeachment. He was guilty then and is still guilty.

Roberts acted illegally??
You're barking mad.

Vidman lied alright. He said it didn't happen. That worked well.

 

[Boris Norris]

Government officials in high places turned a blind eye to the disgraceful illegal Trump impeachment conducted totally by Trump hating politicians after denying him every right in the Constitution and suspending due process so they could pretend their lynching was legal. I have no respect for Justice Roberts either for disallowing Senators to ask pertinent questions of the Democrat inquisitors that Roberts claimed was to p[rotect the identity of the whistleblower. What made that whole thing so stupid is that it has long been illegal to use anonymous testimony against a defendant who has not been allowed to call witnesses in the politically corrupted kangaroo court show trial.

When Vindman admitted later that he had lied to Congress about the phone call and about being the whistleblower, he proved all the dogs seeking to nail Trump on the false allegation were incompetent, biased, or fools.

Did weisleman lie also?
It's a national sport with republicans.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

Government officials in high places turned a blind eye to the disgraceful illegal Trump impeachment conducted totally by Trump hating politicians after denying him every right in the Constitution and suspending due process so they could pretend their lynching was legal. I have no respect for Justice Roberts either for disallowing Senators to ask pertinent questions of the Democrat inquisitors that Roberts claimed was to p[rotect the identity of the whistleblower. What made that whole thing so stupid is that it has long been illegal to use anonymous testimony against a defendant who has not been allowed to call witnesses in the politically corrupted kangaroo court show trial.

When Vindman admitted later that he had lied to Congress about the phone call and about being the whistleblower, he proved all the dogs seeking to nail Trump on the false allegation were incompetent, biased, or fools.

It wasn't illegal. What a bizarre post. Completely detached from reality.

 

[mark francis]

In fact, the phone call was recorded, Johnston confirmed it. There was nothing fake about his impeachment. He was guilty then and is still guilty.

Roberts acted illegally??
You're barking mad.

Vidman lied alright. He said it didn't happen. That worked well.

No, the phone call cooked up by Schiff and his co-conspirator fake whistleblower Vindman was a lie, not the truth.

 

[mark francis]

Did weisleman lie also?
It's a national sport with republicans.

I don't know what you are talking about. Did Weiselberg claim the Schiff perversion of the call was true?

 

[mark francis]

It wasn't illegal. What a bizarre post. Completely detached from reality.

Ten Reasons Impeachment Is Illegitimate | National Review

We are witnessing constitutional government dissipating before our very eyes.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

No, the phone call cooked up by Schiff and his co-conspirator fake whistleblower Vindman was a lie, not the truth.

What a bizarre post. We have the transcript. It was presented as evidence at the impeachment.

Are you insane? I don't get it.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

Ten Reasons Impeachment Is Illegitimate | National Review

We are witnessing constitutional government dissipating before our very eyes.

www.nationalreview.com

I see an opinion piece you didn't read. Am i supposed to read that and try to figure out what point you imagine you just made?

Try to focus: you need to support your lie that the impeachment was illegal.

 

[Boris Norris]

I don't know what you are talking about. Did Weiselberg claim the Schiff perversion of the call was true?

You know exactly what I'm talking about. Don't play dumb.

 

[Boris Norris]

No, the phone call cooked up by Schiff and his co-conspirator fake whistleblower Vindman was a lie, not the truth.

Of course it was.
Idiot.

 

[mark francis]

What a bizarre post. We have the transcript. It was presented as evidence at the impeachment.

Are you insane? I don't get it.

Here is a record of the transcript Schiff dishonestly and with malice presented to Congress and the American people, and it is a fraud and forgery:

Adam Schiff Invents Transcript Of Trump Call With Ukraine President (thefederalist.com)

Adam Schiff Makes Up His Own Transcript Of Call Between Trump And Ukraine President

BY: TRISTAN JUSTICE

SEPTEMBER 26, 2019

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., made up his own version of a transcript between President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart Thursday.

The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., made up his own version of a transcript between President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart to fit the false narrative being peddled by Democrats and many in the media to frame the president for a crime that never happened.

In his opening statement at a congressional hearing featuring acting Department of National Intelligence Director Joseph Maguire, Schiff gave a fictional retelling of the conversation between the two leaders.

Here is what Schiff said:

And what is the President’s response — well it reads like a classic organized crime shake down. In essence, what the President Trump communicates is this: We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. You know what I mean? I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of dirt, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, and not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States — my Attorney General, Bill Barr — he’s got the whole weight of American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy, you’re going to love him. Trust me. You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked.

The actual transcript says no such thing.

The “favor” in question was Trump seeking assistance with the Department of Justice’s probe into the 2016 election meddling by Ukraine. On the phone call, Trump later suggested that Ukrainian officials look into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter for their shady business dealings with a Ukrainian energy company to root out corruption in the European country. While overseeing the administration’s policy toward Ukraine, then-Vice President Biden played a role in firing the Ukrainian prosecutor going after the Ukraine company whose board Hunter sat on for $50,000 a month despite no prior experience working in the industry.

 

[mark francis]

I see an opinion piece you didn't read. Am i supposed to read that and try to figure out what point you imagine you just made?

Try to focus: you need to support your lie that the impeachment was illegal.

Americans have periodically been unjustly and wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not commit for hundreds of years. Trump is the first president to have been unjustly impeached on the basis of lying accusations by members of the opposing political party.