Re-election looking good for Trump

speaking of corruption:

And Trump made it very clear that he would favor people who patronized his hotel. There was just one day in April of 2018 when a group of executives from T-Mobile who wanted Justice Department approvals for their merger checked into the hotel. That same day, Trump held a fundraiser with two business associates of Rudy Giuliani, who had contributed $300,000 to a superPAC related to Trump and were, therefore, able to go straight to Trump to pitch their idea for a gas company in Ukraine. That was what was going on at the hotel. And President Trump made it very, very clear that if you paid him, you could play.
 
Werbung:
speaking of corruption:

So during the inauguration - the last one - there was a move by the inaugural committee, which is a charity, to book some events at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., which is a fine thing to do. But when the charity came and said, hey, give us a break; we're a charity, the response of the Trump Organization was, no, we're going to charge you a very hefty sum
 
speaking of corruption:

When Donald Trump took office four years ago, he did not divest himself of the businesses that made him rich, a move which his critics said would lead to countless conflicts of interest. Well, since then, U.S. taxpayers have paid Trump properties for security costs involved in hosting hundreds of presidential visits. Foreign and domestic politicians have paid for countless stops at his hotels and resorts
 
speaking of corruption:

A major part of his Trump Organization revenue came from the marquee properties that he often visited during his presidency. The Trump Hotel in DC, his now “home” Mar-a-Lago and his golf courses Doral, Bedminister and Trump National Washington brought in a combined $620,709,659 over the last four years. He paid a combined 399 visits to these properties as president.
 
Your Posts Should Be Toast

Nasty blowhards like you made them ditch this forum in disgust. It's pretty pathetic to think that simple-minded ranting in incoherent and irrelevant outrage will make a man out of you.
Thank you for your advice. I'll pass it on as it's surplus to my requirements and it comes from a spurious source.

Does that sound incoherent and irrelevant dickhead?
 
Werbung:
Back
Top