Obama’s Policy on Libya: Kill a crapload of innocent civilians and leave the murderous thug dictator unscathed and in power. By now I know the question that has the Internet all in a buzz is, nobull, what do you think about the No Fly Zone in Libya?
I did some research and it turns out that it doesn’t involve beating liberal hippies, so it has that going against it right off the bat. The best way to find hippies for beating is to infiltrate anti-war protests, but I can’t seem to find any.
As I’ve gotten older, I have more and more of an attitude that we should just mind our own damn business. On the other hand, if I was standing on my front lawn and some thug was beating a non-hippie, it wouldn’t be right for me to just stand there thinking, “Oops. Out of beer. Better go get a fresh cold one.”
I’d run over there and crack the mofo in the skull and save the innocent victim.Or at least i hope i would..
So, what’s the official stance from the White House on Libya?
The White House suggested Tuesday the mission in Libya is one of regime change, despite emphatic statements from President Obama and military brass that the goal is not to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power.
I call that a game changer right there. I’m not a peacenik, even though I am pretty much against allowing government to do anything at all whatsoever. Some of the criteria for Military intervention I have are:
Is there a clear strategy?
Do we know how to define victory?
Is there a benefit to us?
Do we get to steal their oil and keep it for ourselves?
Do I get to beat a hippie?
The answer to all of these seems to be a big fat “No.”
President Obama has no intention of removing Colonel Cockroach from power. WTC? What’s the point then? Now it’s like instead of cracking the mofo in the skull, I run around the neighborhood throwing molotov cocktails at all the neighbors houses, and tell the guy, “no worries mate, I won’t harm you.”
I think we should assemble a small skilled team. Go in. Cap Khadafi in the skull and get the helll out. Mission Accomplished. I know the Socialist Scumbags on the Left love that phrase.
Wasn’t one of the big mistakes we made in the Gulf War was that we left Sodomize Hussein in power to continue to roll tide his people. Graphic, but nothing compared to what he actually did to his people. Obama wants to repeat the mistakes of history.
One of the best things that happened with Iraq the Sequel is that Saddam is a rotting corpse. I hear the recidivism rate on genocide is really low when your dead. Additionally, Iraq and Afghanistan are on the border of Iran, so I can see how there would be strategic benefit to setting up bases of operations there. Libya is strategically located next to what? Chad? Tunisia?
Killing Colonel ahole could send a message to the world: Kill your own people and we’ll kill you. Instead, we seem to be saying, if you don’t stop killing your own people we’ll kill them for you. No worries mate. We mean you no harm.
President Obama had a reputation for voting “Present” on controversial issues prior to being elected. Passing the buck to the UN and France to take the lead instead of showing leadership skills, President Teleprompter once again votes “Present” on the issue of Libya.
My promise to you
Bookmark this post. I absolutely, unequivocally guarantee to you that in the next election, the response President Obama will have to any attempts at criticism on using the military in Libya is going to be that we followed the guidance of the UN. His official position will be to pass the buck, take no responsibility, show no leadership, vote “present,” and blame France and the UN.
I did some research and it turns out that it doesn’t involve beating liberal hippies, so it has that going against it right off the bat. The best way to find hippies for beating is to infiltrate anti-war protests, but I can’t seem to find any.
As I’ve gotten older, I have more and more of an attitude that we should just mind our own damn business. On the other hand, if I was standing on my front lawn and some thug was beating a non-hippie, it wouldn’t be right for me to just stand there thinking, “Oops. Out of beer. Better go get a fresh cold one.”
I’d run over there and crack the mofo in the skull and save the innocent victim.Or at least i hope i would..
So, what’s the official stance from the White House on Libya?
The White House suggested Tuesday the mission in Libya is one of regime change, despite emphatic statements from President Obama and military brass that the goal is not to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power.
I call that a game changer right there. I’m not a peacenik, even though I am pretty much against allowing government to do anything at all whatsoever. Some of the criteria for Military intervention I have are:
Is there a clear strategy?
Do we know how to define victory?
Is there a benefit to us?
Do we get to steal their oil and keep it for ourselves?
Do I get to beat a hippie?
The answer to all of these seems to be a big fat “No.”
President Obama has no intention of removing Colonel Cockroach from power. WTC? What’s the point then? Now it’s like instead of cracking the mofo in the skull, I run around the neighborhood throwing molotov cocktails at all the neighbors houses, and tell the guy, “no worries mate, I won’t harm you.”
I think we should assemble a small skilled team. Go in. Cap Khadafi in the skull and get the helll out. Mission Accomplished. I know the Socialist Scumbags on the Left love that phrase.
Wasn’t one of the big mistakes we made in the Gulf War was that we left Sodomize Hussein in power to continue to roll tide his people. Graphic, but nothing compared to what he actually did to his people. Obama wants to repeat the mistakes of history.
One of the best things that happened with Iraq the Sequel is that Saddam is a rotting corpse. I hear the recidivism rate on genocide is really low when your dead. Additionally, Iraq and Afghanistan are on the border of Iran, so I can see how there would be strategic benefit to setting up bases of operations there. Libya is strategically located next to what? Chad? Tunisia?
Killing Colonel ahole could send a message to the world: Kill your own people and we’ll kill you. Instead, we seem to be saying, if you don’t stop killing your own people we’ll kill them for you. No worries mate. We mean you no harm.
President Obama had a reputation for voting “Present” on controversial issues prior to being elected. Passing the buck to the UN and France to take the lead instead of showing leadership skills, President Teleprompter once again votes “Present” on the issue of Libya.
My promise to you
Bookmark this post. I absolutely, unequivocally guarantee to you that in the next election, the response President Obama will have to any attempts at criticism on using the military in Libya is going to be that we followed the guidance of the UN. His official position will be to pass the buck, take no responsibility, show no leadership, vote “present,” and blame France and the UN.
