Nambla Vs Polygamy

How ever much time you have seen my posts is how much time I spend on these things.

Why? hmm I said it in my posts. I am pro Polygamy and I am mad that they have to hide from the world in shame, while some yell and scream oh we must make homosexual marriage legal. First fix polygamy then worry for the second.
you need to make sense if you are truly wanting to state a case for something and have people take you seriously and treat you with respect.

I posted the NAMBLA part because I was sick of hearing how this one group married off 13 and 14 year olds but no one cares that these freaked out homosexuals use ten year old boys then toss them out for the next ten year old boy they can trick into relationships.

Any kid sex is bad but one is by far the worse and no one seems to care about them. NAMBLA is open and public in what it wants to do to little boys, for god sakes the stupid ACLU have defended them.
the aclu does not defend what nambla is/does.
2 of them were accused of murdering then raping a 10 year old boy they tricked into getting in their car.
nope your facts are wrong. the kid (i know his father) was raped and murdered by two creeps. one had visited nambla site/books, so what? nambla didn't encourage him to commit heinous crimes. the one guy was well known to the family of the victim. there is far more to this story than you state.

Anyways, hope that answers your question.
sigh
 
Werbung:
Polygamy is against the law. Why? Because the state only recognizes two people being married to each other. A person may only be married to one other person.

If a religious group wants to have religious ceremonies that are not civil marriages (that are not recognized by the state), but are considered marriages by the group, what can the state do? The thing is the 'marriages' would not have the force of law.

Adults may have sex with as many people as they want. Adults may father/mother as many kids as they want by as many partners as they want. There are no laws against these things.
 
I think you will find that the ACLU defended their right to the same free speech that Christians, Nazis, KKK, and polygamists already have. The whole issue with the polygamists in the news is that they were molesting children and NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT IT. Any of the NAMBLA folks who get caught actually molesting kids get the same treatment as the child molesting polygamists are getting.

The news letter NAMBLA sends out and the info on their website tells you how to get and rape these boys and get away with it. I believe in free speech but there is a limit.

Yelling fire in a crowded theater and telling your pervs how to rape little boys.
 
Just curious: why is raping a little girl is better than raping a little boy? And you really have your terms wrong, people who molest children of either gender are pedophiles, neither hetero nor homo applies.

Marrying a 13 or 14 seems wrong to me I would rather they wait till the girl is 16 at least and only marry the guy she picks not the guy the prophet picks or the parents pick.


if you can not figure out the diffence in a 14 year od getting married and a ten year old boy being raped in the butt, then tossed out like rotton hamburger while the perv looks for another ten year old boy.

I say ten because that is the avarage age NAMBLA targets, though they do have interest in 3, 4, 5, through ten.
 
you need to make sense if you are truly wanting to state a case for something and have people take you seriously and treat you with respect.

the aclu does not defend what nambla is/does. nope your facts are wrong. the kid (i know his father) was raped and murdered by two creeps. one had visited nambla site/books, so what? nambla didn't encourage him to commit heinous crimes. the one guy was well known to the family of the victim. there is far more to this story than you state.

sigh



The ACLU defends NAMBLA's right to send out their flyers and have their website where they give ideas and instructions on how to rape the boys.

There are some things that are not defendable, that is one of them.

I watched the trial of one of these guys, he was a member of NAMBLA, though I only watched one of the trials, the second was said also to be a member but I never saw it said under oath
 
The news letter NAMBLA sends out and the info on their website tells you how to get and rape these boys and get away with it. I believe in free speech but there is a limit.

Yelling fire in a crowded theater and telling your pervs how to rape little boys.
That's a complex problem, there are people putting the instuctions for bomb making on the internet and publishing books on how to torture people. Where do we draw the line? Just like the problem of pornography, I don't know how to decide what's to be censored and what not. Do you? There are all kinds of disgusting things being said and published that I would like to see suppressed, but I'm not a big fan of censorship either.
 
Marrying a 13 or 14 seems wrong to me I would rather they wait till the girl is 16 at least and only marry the guy she picks not the guy the prophet picks or the parents pick.


if you can not figure out the diffence in a 14 year od getting married and a ten year old boy being raped in the butt, then tossed out like rotton hamburger while the perv looks for another ten year old boy.

I say ten because that is the avarage age NAMBLA targets, though they do have interest in 3, 4, 5, through ten.

You didn't put all that explanation in your previous post. Raping younger children is worse than older ones, I agree. Your knowledge of NAMBLA surprises me, did you actually study up on these folks or are you just using your imagination to fill in your worst fears. Got a source for your information? It would be good to note that pedophiles target girls just as young as boys and they rape them and throw them away, blaming just "gay" pedophiles is myopic.
 
There are all kinds of disgusting things being said and published that I would like to see suppressed, but I'm not a big fan of censorship either.

I'm pretty fed up with some of the commercials too. It seems like there are way too many Viagra type commercials. Who cares if someone has E.D. It makes me want to stick my head out the window and say "Hey, ED! Take a break!". If a guy has E.D., don't tell the world! Just put on large sunglasses, baggy coat, a big hat, and go to a sex fiend enhancement doctor.
cartoon_flasher.gif
 
The ACLU defends NAMBLA's right to send out their flyers and have their website where they give ideas and instructions on how to rape the boys.

There are some things that are not defendable, that is one of them.

I watched the trial of one of these guys, he was a member of NAMBLA, though I only watched one of the trials, the second was said also to be a member but I never saw it said under oath
the ACLU defends principles, not men or women. they defend civil liberties of all. it is unpopular. ideas? you want to outlaw ideas? you're mad.

instructions on how to rape children? proven membership? unfortunately you have remembered wrong...

According to police, Jaynes had eight issues of a NAMBLA publication in his home at the time of his arrest
The American Civil Liberties Union stepped in to defend NAMBLA as a free speech matter and won a dismissal based on the fact that NAMBLA is organized as an unincorporated association, not a corporation. John Reinstein, the director of the ACLU Massachusetts, said that although NAMBLA "may extol conduct which is currently illegal", there was nothing on its website that "advocated or incited the commission of any illegal acts, including murder or rape".[31]
I happen to know mister Curley. I am on his side. But you are telling lies. You do his case a disservice.
 
You didn't put all that explanation in your previous post. Raping younger children is worse than older ones, I agree. Your knowledge of NAMBLA surprises me, did you actually study up on these folks or are you just using your imagination to fill in your worst fears. Got a source for your information? It would be good to note that pedophiles target girls just as young as boys and they rape them and throw them away, blaming just "gay" pedophiles is myopic.


Do you know of any other pedophiles that have a group? Who has an organization, website, and directions on how to get away with it? If you do, tell me so I can complain about them also.

I will look for a news clip on the internet about the story. Its a few years old but there has to be something written about it. It was on the news and the trial was up dated daily, so there has to be something on the net.
 
the ACLU defends principles, not men or women. they defend civil liberties of all. it is unpopular. ideas? you want to outlaw ideas? you're mad.

instructions on how to rape children? proven membership? unfortunately you have remembered wrong...


I happen to know mister Curley. I am on his side. But you are telling lies. You do his case a disservice.

I have no clue to most of what you are saying, its probably just me but I cant seem to follow any of your posts.

But thank you for the name Curley, that will help my search for Mare
 
I am so sick of this stupid argument


In 1978 psychologist Nicholas Groth screened 175 men who had been convicted in Massachusetts of sexual molestation of children and referred by a court for psychological evaluation. He found not a single gay man in this sample. Every one of the perpetrators was either an exclusive heterosexual, a bisexual with a predominantly heterosexual orientation, or a fixated pedophile with no sexual interest in adults.[4]

His conclusion? That "the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater risk to the underage child than does the adult homosexual male."

In the same year, researcher David Newton reviewed the scientific literature and found no reason to believe that anything other than a "random connection" existed between homosexual orientation and child molestation.[5]

Later research has confirmed these findings:

* In 1988, renowned sex researcher Kurt Freund at the Clarke Institute of Psychiatry in Toronto studied two groups of paid volunteers and found that gay men responded no more to male child stimuli than heterosexual men responded to female child stimuli.[6] He later described as a "myth" the notion that gay men are more likely than straight men to be child molesters.[7]
* In 1992, alarmed over claims made during a campaign for an anti-gay state constitutional amendment in Colorado, two physicians reviewed every case of suspected child molestation evaluated at Children's Hospital in Denver over a one-year period. Of the 269 cases determined to involve molestation by an adult, only two of the perpetrators could be identified as gay or lesbian. The researchers concluded that the risk of child sexual abuse by an identifiably gay or lesbian person was between zero and 3.1%, and that the risk of such abuse by the heterosexual partner of a relative was over 100 times greater.[8]

Playing the Pedophelia Card


The evidence is clear. Heterosexuals are 100 times more likely to be pedophiles. When are we going to wake up and make heterosexuality illegal?




God Hates STR8S
 
I am so sick of this stupid argument





The evidence is clear. Heterosexuals are 100 times more likely to be pedophiles. When are we going to wake up and make heterosexuality illegal?




God Hates STR8S

I think we need to analyze the data with a bit more finesse.
 
Werbung:
I am so sick of this stupid argument





The evidence is clear. Heterosexuals are 100 times more likely to be pedophiles. When are we going to wake up and make heterosexuality illegal?




God Hates STR8S


No one was saying we should make Homosexuality illegal, did you think that was what anyone was saying?


I am having a problem with a group that exists for the sole purpose of targeting and sexually molesting little boys. I would have the exact same problem with a group of NON homosexuals who had a group targeting and sexually molesting little girls. No one wants to make being homosexual illegal.

But I want to make it harder if not impossible for any grown person to hurt children. Homosexual or NON homosexual.
 
Back
Top