Kari lake and election morons lose again lol

[pjmret]

Supreme Court declines to hear Kari Lake voting machine lawsuit
The Supreme Court declined Monday to take up a case brought by Republicans Kari Lake and Mark Finchem over the use of voting machines in Arizona elections, the latest blow to the duo of GOP candidates who have seen their lawsuit rejected several times.

Lake and Finchem asked the Supreme Court to review a federal appellate judge’s decision to dismiss their case last October. The suit sought to block electronic voting machines from being used in the state, questioning their accuracy and reliability.

Election morons love losing!!!

Supreme Court declines to hear Kari Lake voting machine lawsuit

The Supreme Court declined Monday to take up a case brought by Republicans Kari Lake and Mark Finchem over the use of voting machines in Arizona elections, the latest blow to the duo of GOP candida…

thehill.com

 

[mark francis]

Supreme Court declines to hear Kari Lake voting machine lawsuit
The Supreme Court declined Monday to take up a case brought by Republicans Kari Lake and Mark Finchem over the use of voting machines in Arizona elections, the latest blow to the duo of GOP candidates who have seen their lawsuit rejected several times.

Lake and Finchem asked the Supreme Court to review a federal appellate judge’s decision to dismiss their case last October. The suit sought to block electronic voting machines from being used in the state, questioning their accuracy and reliability.

Election morons love losing!!!

Supreme Court declines to hear Kari Lake voting machine lawsuit

The Supreme Court declined Monday to take up a case brought by Republicans Kari Lake and Mark Finchem over the use of voting machines in Arizona elections, the latest blow to the duo of GOP candida…

thehill.com

It is a mystery why the SCOTUS would not want to consider the logic of banning corruptible Democrat voting machines that are programmed and operated by Democrats and then shielded from forensic examinations after elections

 

[pjmret]

It is a mystery why the SCOTUS would not want to consider the logic of banning corruptible Democrat voting machines that are programmed and operated by Democrats and then shielded from forensic examinations after elections

It's not a mystery to intelligent people
There is no such thing as a democrat voting machine lol
God you say the dumbest things

 

[mark francis]

It's not a mystery to intelligent people
There is no such thing as a democrat voting machine lol
God you say the dumbest things

When referring to voting machines manufactured by companies connected to George Soros whose owners are on record declaring devotion to Democrats and hatred for Trump, sold to big blue election wards run by Democrats, I refer to the machines as Democrat voting machines. That is especially true where the machines are certified by Democrats, programmed by Democrats, operated by democrats, and protected by Democrats from forensic examinations.

 

[Phoenix68]

When referring to voting machines manufactured by companies connected to George Soros whose owners are on record declaring devotion to Democrats and hatred for Trump, sold to big blue election wards run by Democrats....

.

.
....It's best you're not allowed to run, free, during the day, either.
.​

 

[pjmret]

When referring to voting machines manufactured by companies connected to George Soros whose owners are on record declaring devotion to Democrats and hatred for Trump, sold to big blue election wards run by Democrats, I refer to the machines as Democrat voting machines. That is especially true where the machines are certified by Democrats, programmed by Democrats, operated by democrats, and protected by Democrats from forensic examinations.

You can refer to them however you want
Choosing to look stupid is your right

 

[Boris Norris]

It is a mystery why the SCOTUS would not want to consider the logic of banning corruptible Democrat voting machines that are programmed and operated by Democrats and then shielded from forensic examinations after elections

Not a mystery to me.
Bearing in mind the SC is stacked with right wing republican godbotherers, exactly what lake and co wanted. The bit she missed was the suit is pure bullshyt. It's been gone over more times than trumps whores.
The SC already know the election fraud was bullshyt. You don't.

 

[mark francis]

Not a mystery to me.
Bearing in mind the SC is stacked with right wing republican godbotherers, exactly what lake and co wanted. The bit she missed was the suit is pure bullshyt. It's been gone over more times than trumps whores.
The SC already know the election fraud was bullshyt. You don't.

Liars keep insisting there was no voting machine corruption in 2020 but they lie because they have a lot to lose if the corruption and/or fraud is uncovered. The corruption has been uncovered, however, yet Democrats and their supporters continue to suppress facts and evidence that expose that corruption. This is from the corruption in the 2020 Georgia election:

Georgia's Gabe Sterling Goes Silent and Is "In Hiding" Since Georgia State Election Board Finds Violations in Second 2020 Election Investigation | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor 4-23-24

Georgia’s Gabe Sterling Goes Silent and Is “In Hiding” Since Georgia State Election Board Finds Violations in Second 2020 Election Investigation

Another complaint related to Fulton County was filed that specifically called out 3,125 duplicate ballot counts and 17,852 votes counted without corresponding ballot images. These ballots should never have been included in the election. This complaint resulted in the creation of investigation SEB2023-25. This investigation is complete and the results of this investigation will be presented to the SEB on May 7, 2023 per a letter recently received by Joe Rossi. This complaint has been categorized by the Board as “violations found.” ...

Note also that that the investigations noted above were independent of two court cases that occurred in Georgia after the 2020 Election. At least three individuals involved in a recount that occurred in the state after the election identified 148,000 ballots that appeared to have been created by a machine and to be fraudulent.

 

[Boris Norris]

Liars keep insisting there was no voting machine corruption in 2020 but they lie because they have a lot to lose if the corruption and/or fraud is uncovered. The corruption has been uncovered, however, yet Democrats and their supporters continue to suppress facts and evidence that expose that corruption. This is from the corruption in the 2020 Georgia election:

Georgia's Gabe Sterling Goes Silent and Is "In Hiding" Since Georgia State Election Board Finds Violations in Second 2020 Election Investigation | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor 4-23-24

Georgia’s Gabe Sterling Goes Silent and Is “In Hiding” Since Georgia State Election Board Finds Violations in Second 2020 Election Investigation

Another complaint related to Fulton County was filed that specifically called out 3,125 duplicate ballot counts and 17,852 votes counted without corresponding ballot images. These ballots should never have been included in the election. This complaint resulted in the creation of investigation SEB2023-25. This investigation is complete and the results of this investigation will be presented to the SEB on May 7, 2023 per a letter recently received by Joe Rossi. This complaint has been categorized by the Board as “violations found.” ...

Note also that that the investigations noted above were independent of two court cases that occurred in Georgia after the 2020 Election. At least three individuals involved in a recount that occurred in the state after the election identified 148,000 ballots that appeared to have been created by a machine and to be fraudulent.

Sorry sunshine. You lost and Trump is the one in court.

 

[mark francis]

Sorry sunshine. You lost and Trump is the one in court.

That is not what the facts I posted show that you have failed to adequately refute.

 

[pjmret]

That is not what the facts I posted show that you have failed to adequately refute.

You post th8ngs you haven't proven to be true

 

[mark francis]

You post th8ngs you haven't proven to be true

Cops do not ignore evidence that has not yet been proven but Democrats demand that evidence of fraud not yet proven true in court be ignored, obstructed, and dismissed.

 

[pjmret]

Cops do not ignore evidence that has not yet been proven but Democrats demand that evidence of fraud not yet proven true in court be ignored, obstructed, and dismissed.

It has to be credible not right-wing winning and that's the difference

Intelligent people demand that people prove their case and you guys failed in every

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

You can refer to them however you want
Choosing to look stupid is your right

How many voting machines has Soros ever owned?
That should not be difficult to find out.

Poor Gabe Sterling, he has apparently lost his right to remain silent.

We can dream of a day when Mark, Tripoli and Annoying Thing all exercise their right to remain silent.

 

[mark francis]

It has to be credible not right-wing winning and that's the difference

Intelligent people demand that people prove their case and you guys failed in every

Calling voter fraud a non-issue in order to hide the fact of fraud is a dishonest tactic of lying looting leftist Democrat seditionists.