Hezbollah Defeated Israel in 2006 — Can It Again?

[mark francis]

Prove fraud occurred. Go for it

Fraud! Fraud!; Gone are the days (aren't they?) when dead men and dogs could ‘vote’ and The Boss held sway. - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

[pjmret]

Fraud! Fraud!; Gone are the days (aren't they?) when dead men and dogs could ‘vote’ and The Boss held sway. - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Quote where that article proves more votes than registered voters

 

[mark francis]

What undisputed facts? List them

Scientists were shocked to discover dinosaur fossils in Alaska several decades ago, contrary to previous commonly accepted evolutionist assumptions. Then evolutionists were shocked to discover (many evolutionists refused to believe the factual discovery for years) dinosaur bones with remaining soft tissues that almost every scientist of the day knew could not have survived for even 1 million years after the death of the dinosaur.

 

[mark francis]

Scientists never stop questioning.
Which is how they differ from religionists who think their religion is 100 percent accurate and unchanging lol

Questioning debatable evolutionist speculations, theories, and assumptions is a wise thing to do.

 

[mark francis]

Quote where that article proves more votes than registered voters

As long as nobody can disprove the report, I see no need to further prove it.

 

[pjmret]

Scientists were shocked to discover dinosaur fossils in Alaska several decades ago, contrary to previous commonly accepted evolutionist assumptions. Then evolutionists were shocked to discover (many evolutionists refused to believe the factual discovery for years) dinosaur bones with remaining soft tissues that almost every scientist of the day knew could not have survived for even 1 million years after the death of the dinosaur.

How does that disprove the age of the earth? Lol
You post the dumbest things

The controversial discovery of 68-million-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex finally has a physical explanation. According to new research, iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay.

So once more science explains things lol

 

[pjmret]

As long as nobody can disprove the report, I see no need to further prove it.

Of course you see no need not to look like a liar
You have no shame

 

[pjmret]

Questioning debatable evolutionist speculations, theories, and assumptions is a wise thing to do.

As long as the alternative isn't religious bs lol

 

[mark francis]

How does that disprove the age of the earth? Lol
You post the dumbest things

The controversial discovery of 68-million-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex finally has a physical explanation. According to new research, iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay.

So once more science explains things lol

How can we try to date the age of the earth? By radioactive element decay? That is debatable since we have no way of knowing whether or not rates of decay could have changed over long periods of time, and especially when we date a rock from a formation geologically dated at millions of years old only to discover when tested that the single rock sample is not yet 50 years old.

 

[mark francis]

Of course you see no need not to look like a liar
You have no shame

You still prove you cannot refute the evidence with facts and logic.

 

[mark francis]

As long as the alternative isn't religious bs lol

You sound like Dawkins who claimed he willing to accept any speculation about the origin of life on earth except the possibility that God created original life on earth.

 

[pjmret]

How can we try to date the age of the earth? By radioactive element decay? That is debatable since we have no way of knowing whether or not rates of decay could have changed over long periods of time, and especially when we date a rock from a formation geologically dated at millions of years old only to discover when tested that the single rock sample is not yet 50 years old.

Science moron attempts arm waving science argument lol

 

[pjmret]

You sound like Dawkins who claimed he willing to accept any speculation about the origin of life on earth except the possibility that God created original life on earth.

God creating life is so vague its not science
I am talking the religious bs science like claiming humans descended literally from Adam and eve in the garden of eden lol