He's kinda like a president

[pjmret]

Likewise, nobody has proven there is not a mountain of evidence of 2020 voter fraud.

Nor would anyone try since the idea of even trying is stupid lol

No one has ever proven there was no fraud on any election
Because only a moron would think that was an intelligent idea lol

 

[mark francis]

Nor would anyone try since the idea of even trying is stupid lol

No one has ever proven there was no fraud on any election
Because only a moron would think that was an intelligent idea lol

Leftist rubes believe it is stupid to believe evidence that shows looters and baby killers committed 2020 voter fraud.

 

[pjmret]

Leftist rubes believe it is stupid to believe evidence that shows looters and baby killers committed 2020 voter fraud.

Nope intelligent people know couldn't even convince Trump judges lol

 

[mark francis]

Nope intelligent people know couldn't even convince Trump judges lol

I notice how you divide judges by political party, implying judges vote along party lines. Nevertheless, no judge in America has disproven the mountain of evidence of voter fraud. The fact that they refused single fraud cases for one reason or another does not mean they disproved the widespread evidence of fraud.

 

[pjmret]

I notice how you divide judges by political party, implying judges vote along party lines. Nevertheless, no judge in America has disproven the mountain of evidence of voter fraud. The fact that they refused single fraud cases for one reason or another does not mean they disproved the widespread evidence of fraud.

nope, since "trump" isn't a political party. duh.

the OBVIOUS point here (well, you didn't get it, lol) is that if you couldn't even convince a judge that trump appointed, who would presumably not be biased against trump, then your evidence must be worthless lol.


i've never seen anyone so stupid as to keep repeating the same nonsense about "no one disproved any fraud happened", lol, as if that was something an intelligent person would expect. no one proved there was no fraud in 2016 either, duh, nor in any other election since the beginning of time. lol

 

[mark francis]

nope, since "trump" isn't a political party. duh.

the OBVIOUS point here (well, you didn't get it, lol) is that if you couldn't even convince a judge that trump appointed, who would presumably not be biased against trump, then your evidence must be worthless lol.


i've never seen anyone so stupid as to keep repeating the same nonsense about "no one disproved any fraud happened", lol, as if that was something an intelligent person would expect. no one proved there was no fraud in 2016 either, duh, nor in any other election since the beginning of time. lol

Judges appointed by Democrats tend to side with Democrats. That is how crooked leftists have managed to obtain so many unjust convictions of innocent opponents of Democrat corruption in US courts.

 

[pjmret]

Judges appointed by Democrats tend to side with Democrats. That is how crooked leftists have managed to obtain so many unjust convictions of innocent opponents of Democrat corruption in US courts.

well so you claim.
with no proof, as always lol

 

[mark francis]

well so you claim.
with no proof, as always lol

Judge Sullivan was ordered to dismiss the wrongful conviction Flynn case, but his response was similar to an old Vietnam war protest mantra:: 'Hell no, I will not let him go.' Democrats unjustly framed Flynn and now Flynn is suing the crooks for their crime.

Judge refuses to dismiss Flynn case, petitions full appellate court

Judge Emmett Sullivan is appealing for a review of a 3-judge panel's decision urging a dismissal of the case against former national security advisor Michael Flynn.

www.foxnews.com

Washington, D.C. federal District Judge Emmett Sullivan is refusing to dismiss the criminal case against former national security advisor Michael Flynn, and is now arguing that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it ordered him to do so last month in a 2-1 ruling.

 

[pjmret]

Judge Sullivan was ordered to dismiss the wrongful conviction Flynn case, but his response was similar to an old Vietnam war protest mantra:: 'Hell no, I will not let him go.' Democrats unjustly framed Flynn and now Flynn is suing the crooks for their crime.

Judge refuses to dismiss Flynn case, petitions full appellate court

Judge Emmett Sullivan is appealing for a review of a 3-judge panel's decision urging a dismissal of the case against former national security advisor Michael Flynn.

www.foxnews.com

Washington, D.C. federal District Judge Emmett Sullivan is refusing to dismiss the criminal case against former national security advisor Michael Flynn, and is now arguing that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it ordered him to do so last month in a 2-1 ruling.

was his response illegal?

 

[mark francis]

was his response illegal?

Disobeying a court order is considered illegal, but not in every circumstance, especially when judges sharply disagree among themselves.

Washington, D.C. federal District Judge Emmett Sullivan is refusing to dismiss the criminal case ...(and)
is now arguing that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it ordered him to do so last month in a 2-1 ruling.

 

[pjmret]

Disobeying a court order is considered illegal, but not in every circumstance, especially when judges sharply disagree among themselves.

so you agree he is doing nothing illegal.

 

[mark francis]

so you agree he is doing nothing illegal.

No. He is a Democrat judge, and everyone 'knows' fascist Democrat judges make laws, they are not bound to obey laws, as they have so clearly demonstrated over the last several years.

 

[pjmret]

No. He is a Democrat judge, and everyone 'knows' fascist Democrat judges make laws, they are not bound to obey laws, as they have so clearly demonstrated over the last several years.

so is he doing anything illegal, yes or no?

 

[mark francis]

so is he doing anything illegal, yes or no?

Is it illegal for bent prosecutors to convict a sitting President of an alleged crime in which the President's civil and human rights as well as due process defense rights are disallowed? Third world socialist Democrat kangaroo courts are not just, no matter whether the crooks claim the injustice is legal or not.

 

[pjmret]

Is it illegal for bent prosecutors to convict a sitting President of an alleged crime in which the President's civil and human rights as well as due process defense rights are disallowed?

yes or no?