Hannity confession: smoking gun evidence as Fox chief Murdoch forced under oath

Werbung:
who said proving them is very difficult and expensive? states are quite happy with their processes, *****.
In order to verify that every ballot cast was legitimate the names and addresses on each ballot would have to be verified. Was the voter alive when the vote was cast. Is the address legitimate? Was the voter allowed to use that address to vote? Were the signatures verified or where they rubber-stamped by political operatives without questioning apparent mismatches? Did the voter vote more than once? Did the voter vote in other states as well? Was every name on a cast ballot confirmed to be legitimately in the US?

And so forth.
 
In order to verify that every ballot cast was legitimate the names and addresses on each ballot would have to be verified. Was the voter alive when the vote was cast. Is the address legitimate? Was the voter allowed to use that address to vote? Were the signatures verified or where they rubber-stamped by political operatives without questioning apparent mismatches? Did the voter vote more than once? Did the voter vote in other states as well? Was every name on a cast ballot confirmed to be legitimately in the US?

And so forth.

you mean literally 100% compliance on every single ballot out of 150 million cast? of course you can't do that. no one suggests we do that, including republicans *****. I mean, how can we prove it isn't space aliens taking over the bodies of valid voters? duh.

but states are happy with their procedures, including republican states. sorry if you aren't satisfied.
 
you could be, but I know of single mothers who struggle financially, they obviously exist.

unlike your "stolen election" you morons can't prove. lol
Povery is one of the most common results of socialist Marxist fascist governments.
 
not only have I seen the "evidence" so have courts and states and the federal government, and not a bit of it proves this fraud you morons claim exists. which is why they all laugh at you.
Anyone who thinks no fraud took place but cannot adequately explain away the evidence of fraud is an idiot for laughing at Americans who do see the fraud and don't like it.
 
Anyone who thinks no fraud took place but cannot adequately explain away the evidence of fraud is an idiot for laughing at Americans who do see the fraud and don't like it.

there is no credible evidence of fraud to explain away, *****. lol

but I am laughing at you.
 
by christian moms? who is talking about "christian moms" here, *****? lol
Someone opened the discussion of fake white racism and I just pointed out that democrats like to call good Americans disrespectful names for opposing the lying leftist narratives.
 
you mean literally 100% compliance on every single ballot out of 150 million cast? of course you can't do that. no one suggests we do that, including republicans *****. I mean, how can we prove it isn't space aliens taking over the bodies of valid voters? duh.

but states are happy with their procedures, including republican states. sorry if you aren't satisfied.
Now you see why democrats are getting away with massive voter fraud. They know fake and illegitimate ballots cannot be exposed because the type of investigation that would be required to expose the massive fraud would be almost impossible to do, even if leftist officials were not obstructing such investigations.
 
Werbung:
poverty occurs in capitalistic countries too *****. duh
Especially in countries where the dirty officials are robbing the Treasury blind to enrich themselves, their families, their friends, their supporters, and their partners in crime.
 
Back
Top