CrowdStrike proved Russians did not steal dirty DNC emails

[mark francis]

Someone recently posted the corrected story CrowdStrike published that claimed the US is 2 times more respected in the world under Biden than it was under Trump. Biden is twice as popular under nations opposed to US capitalism? That does not surprise me. What Americans should be ashamed of is being duped into buying into the lie that Russia hacked the DNC and gave copies of dirty emails to Assange when CrowdStrike admitted under oath that they had no evidence of that occurrence.

CrowdStrike has received hundreds of millions of dollars from government contracts over the years and is still doing massive business for the government under Biden. Nobody should be surprised that the only company ever allowed to examine the DNC computers after the DNC email leak was CrowdStrike, not local law enforcement or FBI investigators., The democrats needed all investigators to be inhouse for 'security' reasons. In other words, the crooks hired crooked investigators to investigate themselves so no inconvenient facts could come out.

CrowdStrike testified under oath in Congress that they had no evidence the Russians stole the DNC emails by hacking.

 

[mark francis]

Someone recently posted the corrected story CrowdStrike published that claimed the US is 2 times more respected in the world under Biden than it was under Trump. Biden is twice as popular under nations opposed to US capitalism? That does not surprise me. What Americans should be ashamed of is being duped into buying into the lie that Russia hacked the DNC and gave copies of dirty emails to Assange when CrowdStrike admitted under oath that they had no evidence of that occurrence.

CrowdStrike has received hundreds of millions of dollars from government contracts over the years and is still doing massive business for the government under Biden. Nobody should be surprised that the only company ever allowed to examine the DNC computers after the DNC email leak was CrowdStrike, not local law enforcement or FBI investigators., The democrats needed all investigators to be inhouse for 'security' reasons. In other words, the crooks hired crooked investigators to investigate themselves so no inconvenient facts could come out.

CrowdStrike testified under oath in Congress that they had no evidence the Russians stole the DNC emails by hacking.

https://itwire.com/business-it-news...proof-that-russia-exfiltrated-dnc-emails.html

CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails

​

By Sam Varghese

• Comments:2 Comments

Image by Muhammad Ribkhan from Pixabay


The controversial American security firm CrowdStrike, which was called in to investigate the alleged Russian hack of DNC servers in 2016, had no proof that any emails from the system had been exfiltrated despite public assertions that this had occurred, according to the transcript of an interview released by the US Government a few days ago.

The transcript was from an interview conducted with CrowdStrike's president of services and chief security officer Shawn Henry by the US House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in December 2017, but only released to the US Special Counsel Robert Mueller who conducted a two-year inquiry into alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 presidential poll.

While the exfiltration of emails from the DNC server has been accepted as a proven fact, Henry's answers to queries from committee members make it clear that this was definitely not the case.

In one typical exchange, Henry was asked, "What about the emails that everyone is so, you know, knowledgeable of? Were there also indicators that they were prepared but not evidence that they actually were exfiltrated?"
To this Henry responded, "There's not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There's circumstantial evidence - but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated."

Henry told the panel that CrowdStrike had become a part of the investigation after a contractor working for the DNC contacted him. The FBI had notified the DNC that it had been hacked and that the intrusion was believed to have been carried out by a foreign power.

Asked why the FBI had not taken the lead in the investigation, Henry replied: "In these types of cases, my experience typically has been notification made to the victim about what has occurred in their environment, not that the FBI would typically come in. And they certainly wouldn't conduct a remediation."

Henry said CrowdStrike had begun its analysis of the hacked servers in May and the process had taken about four to six weeks, after which remediation commenced. The DNC was still vulnerable while the analysis was taking place.

While he claimed the network environment had been cleaned up by the remediation, Henry also said that in September another attack was noticed which CrowdStrike could not mitigate with the tools used to fix the first attack.

Asked by the head of the committee, Adam Schiff, when the emails from the DNC were exfiltrated, Henry replied: "We did not have concrete evidence that data was exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated."

And in response to another query, Henry said: "There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case, it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don't have the evidence that says it actually left."

Numerous stories in media organs around the world have claimed that the DNC emails were handed to WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange, but Henry's statements cast serious doubts on that.

On his part, Assange has always said that while a foreign power may have been involved in the DNC breach, the emails which WikiLeaks released in the run-up to the election were not given to the organisation by Russia or any state-actors.

Assange is now in prison in the UK, awaiting a hearing to decide whether Britain will extradite him to the US for trial over leaking government information.


While Henry claimed that the DNC had never told him that the FBI was requesting a look at the servers, there have been reports that the security agency, headed by James Comey at the time, made numerous requests for access to the hacked hardware.

Comey has admitted in congressional testimony that he chose not to take control of the hacked servers, and did not send FBI tech experts to inspect them, but has not given any explanation so far as to why he acted in this way.

CrowdStrike's involvement helped the company no end, increasing its public profile to the point where the company was able to go public last year. It is now valued at around US$16 billion, easily the highest valuation in the industry.

 

[Boris Norris]

Just

Someone recently posted the corrected story CrowdStrike published that claimed the US is 2 times more respected in the world under Biden than it was under Trump. Biden is twice as popular under nations opposed to US capitalism? That does not surprise me. What Americans should be ashamed of is being duped into buying into the lie that Russia hacked the DNC and gave copies of dirty emails to Assange when CrowdStrike admitted under oath that they had no evidence of that occurrence.

CrowdStrike has received hundreds of millions of dollars from government contracts over the years and is still doing massive business for the government under Biden. Nobody should be surprised that the only company ever allowed to examine the DNC computers after the DNC email leak was CrowdStrike, not local law enforcement or FBI investigators., The democrats needed all investigators to be inhouse for 'security' reasons. In other words, the crooks hired crooked investigators to investigate themselves so no inconvenient facts could come out.

CrowdStrike testified under oath in Congress that they had no evidence the Russians stole the DNC emails by hacking.

Just a clip from wiki.

CrowdStrike helped investigate the Democratic National Committee cyber attacks and a connection to Russian intelligence services. On March 20, 2017, James Comey testified before congress stating, "CrowdStrike, Mandiant, and ThreatConnect review[ed] the evidence of the hack and conclude[d] with high certainty that it was the work of APT 28 and APT 29 who are known to be Russian intelligence services."[44

Some more from Crowdstrike regarding their contract with the government.

• https://twitter.com/CrowdStrike

BLOG

• Featured
• Recent
• Videos
• Categories
• Start Free Trial

CrowdStrike’s work with the Democratic National Committee: Setting the record straight​

June 5, 2020
Editorial Team From The Front Lines

June 5, 2020 UPDATE​

Blog update following the release of the testimony by Shawn Henry, CSO and President of CrowdStrike Services, before the House Intelligence Committee that was recently declassified.
What was CrowdStrike’s role in investigating the hack of the DNC?
CrowdStrike was contacted on April 30, 2016 to respond to a suspected breach. We began our work with the DNC on May 1, 2016, collecting intelligence and analyzing the breach. After conducting this analysis and identifying the adversaries on the network, on June 10, 2016 we initiated a coordinated remediation event to ensure the intruders were removed and could not regain access. That remediation process lasted approximately 2-3 days and was completed on June 13, 2016.
Why did the DNC contact CrowdStrike?
The DNC contacted CrowdStrike to respond to a suspected cyber attack impacting its network. The DNC was first alerted to the hack by the FBI in September 2015. According to testimony by DNC IT contractor Yared Tamene Wolde-Yohannes, the FBI attributed the breach to the Russian Government in September 2015 (page 7).
Why did the DNC hire CrowdStrike instead of just working with the FBI to investigate the hack?
The FBI doesn’t perform incident response or network remediation services when organizations need to get back to business after a breach.
CrowdStrike is a leader in protecting customers around the world from cyber threats. It is common for organizations to hire third-party industry experts, like CrowdStrike, to investigate and remediate cyber attacks when they suspect a breach even if they are collaborating with law enforcement.

Here again is a wiki bit about who they are.
You will note they have the expertise to investigate anything related to electronics etc, including voting machines. There's no logical reason for an already contractor to be ignored over the issue.

Dominion Voting Systems - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

I also note what your saying, at this point, is supported by nothing. You did say "someone said" . Always a reliable source.
Secondly, you are implying there was something corrupt going on and again no evidence.
I also remind you Crowdstrike, who were contract to the govt in 2011, did work for the GOP as far as I can tell.

I'll leave you to check that and read the relevant docos.

Here's spread release that's interesting.

Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC

CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia

www.realclearinvestigations.com

 

[mark francis]

Just

Just a clip from wiki.

CrowdStrike helped investigate the Democratic National Committee cyber attacks and a connection to Russian intelligence services. On March 20, 2017, James Comey testified before congress stating, "CrowdStrike, Mandiant, and ThreatConnect review[ed] the evidence of the hack and conclude[d] with high certainty that it was the work of APT 28 and APT 29 who are known to be Russian intelligence services."[44

Some more from Crowdstrike regarding their contract with the government.

• https://twitter.com/CrowdStrike

BLOG

• Featured
• Recent
• Videos
• Categories
• Start Free Trial

CrowdStrike’s work with the Democratic National Committee: Setting the record straight​

June 5, 2020
Editorial Team From The Front Lines

June 5, 2020 UPDATE​

Blog update following the release of the testimony by Shawn Henry, CSO and President of CrowdStrike Services, before the House Intelligence Committee that was recently declassified.
What was CrowdStrike’s role in investigating the hack of the DNC?
CrowdStrike was contacted on April 30, 2016 to respond to a suspected breach. We began our work with the DNC on May 1, 2016, collecting intelligence and analyzing the breach. After conducting this analysis and identifying the adversaries on the network, on June 10, 2016 we initiated a coordinated remediation event to ensure the intruders were removed and could not regain access. That remediation process lasted approximately 2-3 days and was completed on June 13, 2016.
Why did the DNC contact CrowdStrike?
The DNC contacted CrowdStrike to respond to a suspected cyber attack impacting its network. The DNC was first alerted to the hack by the FBI in September 2015. According to testimony by DNC IT contractor Yared Tamene Wolde-Yohannes, the FBI attributed the breach to the Russian Government in September 2015 (page 7).
Why did the DNC hire CrowdStrike instead of just working with the FBI to investigate the hack?
The FBI doesn’t perform incident response or network remediation services when organizations need to get back to business after a breach.
CrowdStrike is a leader in protecting customers around the world from cyber threats. It is common for organizations to hire third-party industry experts, like CrowdStrike, to investigate and remediate cyber attacks when they suspect a breach even if they are collaborating with law enforcement.

Here again is a wiki bit about who they are.
You will note they have the expertise to investigate anything related to electronics etc, including voting machines. There's no logical reason for an already contractor to be ignored over the issue.

Dominion Voting Systems - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

I also note what your saying, at this point, is supported by nothing. You did say "someone said" . Always a reliable source.
Secondly, you are implying there was something corrupt going on and again no evidence.
I also remind you Crowdstrike, who were contract to the govt in 2011, did work for the GOP as far as I can tell.

I'll leave you to check that and read the relevant docos.

Here's spread release that's interesting.

Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC

CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia

www.realclearinvestigations.com

James Comey is a liar. CrowdStrike was hired early in 2016 to investigate email leaks from DNC computers pertaining to the Sanders' campaign which had nothing to do with Trump. After CrowdStrike claimed to have secured the DNC computers from hacking in June 2016 further emails were exfiltrated and delivered to Assange. Those emails were different from the emails first uncovered about the crime against Sanders by the DNC. After Assange informed the DNC of those emails the democrats came out the next day with the claim that Russians colluded with Trump to hack the DNC computers. Never mind that Trump had nothing to do with it and never mind that the emails did not get to Assange by hacking, and never mind that Seth Rich was mysteriously executed just days after the info came out.

Do you want irrefutable facts? Here are some which can be proven beyond doubt:

Here are the facts:

• Seth Rich was a Sanders supporter.
• Early leaked DNC emails showed the DNC was illegally stacking the deck against Sanders in the democrat primary.
• DNC emails removed by a thumb drive or similar device were given to Wikileaks.
• After Assange informed the DNC he had copies of their emails Seth Rich was murdered on the street in DC at night.
• Rich’s house was also ransacked and his computers were stolen.
• The DC police and the FBI claimed they had no idea why Rich was murdered and claimed to know nothing about his computers being stolen.
• Two years later the FBI admitted they had Rich’s computer but claimed they would not turn over information obtained from the computer for 65 years.
• Mueller was hired to investigate the stolen DNC emails, but he never investigated Rich’s connection to the emails even though Assange suggested Rich was the one who gave him copies of the emails.
• When questioned before Congress, CrowdStrike owner claimed they found no evidence the emails were stolen by hacking.
• 10. Scores of forensics investigators claimed evidence proved the emails were not hacked by Russians.

 

[pjmret]

Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?

Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.

Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.

To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.”

Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight

Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.

www.crowdstrike.com

you're so stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?

Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.

Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.

To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.”

Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight

Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.

www.crowdstrike.com

you're so stupid. lol

The FBI informed the DNC in 2016 that they had been tracking Russian hackers for over a year. Why the DNC was not told earlier is anyone's guess. However, as your source points out, CrowdStrike published their findings on June 14, 2016, proving that report dealt with the DNC emails exposing the political DNC crimes against Burney Sanders that had nothing to do with Trump.

The later batch of emails that were taken from DNC computers were exfiltrated in July, 2016, just a few days before the DNC invented the Guccifer 2.0 hacker that nobody has proven exists, unlike the Guccifer 1 hacker who was arrested and jailed for hacking. Seth Rich was also murdered just a few days after Assange revealed he had the new batch of DNC emails. The FBI investigated Rich's murder and said nothing about his home being ransacked and his computers being stolen after the murder. For two years the FBI denied it had Rich's computer but after their lie was exposed Chris Wray demanded the FBI be allowed to hide the information on Rich's computer from Americans for 65 years.

Credible sources claim there is direct clear information on Rich's computer tying him to Assange and the leaked emails, proving the FBI is desperately hiding something they do not want the public to know.

 

[pjmret]

The FBI informed the DNC in 2016 that they had been tracking Russian hackers for over a year. Why the DNC was not told earlier is anyone's guess. However, as your source points out, CrowdStrike published their findings on June 14, 2016, proving that report dealt with the DNC emails exposing the political DNC crimes against Burney Sanders that had nothing to do with Trump.

crimes? who was charged with a crime, moron? lol

who said trump had anything to do with the hack of dnc emails, moron? lol

 

[mark francis]

crimes? who was charged with a crime, moron? lol

who said trump had anything to do with the hack of dnc emails, moron? lol

Hillary and the DNC committed fraud by illegally squeezing Sanders out of the presidential primary by dishonest corrupt tactics. That is why Rich, a Sanders supporter, exposed Hillary and the DNC by giving copies of DNC emails to Assange.

Do a little research as to why Debbie Wasserman Schultz was fired.

 

[pjmret]

Hillary and the DNC committed fraud by illegally squeezing Sanders out of the presidential primary by dishonest corrupt tactics. That is why Rich, a Sanders supporter, exposed Hillary and the DNC by giving copies of DNC emails to Assange.

Do a little research as to why Debbie Wasserman Schultz was fired.

"dishonest" is not the same word as "illegally", moron.

 

[mark francis]

"dishonest" is not the same word as "illegally", moron.

You win. Democrat courts have judged that democrats can violate whatever rule, value, or moral standard they like as long as they have the apparent majority mob authority to do so.

Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders

The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.

observer.com

 

[pjmret]

You win. Democrat courts have judged that democrats can violate whatever rule, value, or moral standard they like as long as they have the apparent majority mob authority to do so.

Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders

The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.

observer.com

i do win, because i'm right. dems can run their primaries how they want, as long as they don't violate actual laws.
just like republicans can.

 

[mark francis]

i do win, because i'm right. dems can run their primaries how they want, as long as they don't violate actual laws.
just like republicans can.

Democrats may have fooled tens of millions of Americans into erroneously concluding the 2016 democrat primaries were fair but they did not fool Sanders's supporter Seth Rich.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats may have fooled tens of millions of Americans into erroneously concluding the 2016 democrat primaries were fair but they did not fool Sanders's supporter Seth Rich.

who said they were fair? there is no requirement they be "fair". primaries are often not fair for any party, moron. Parties make up their own rules which are often not "fair'. duh

 

[Boris Norris]

James Comey is a liar. CrowdStrike was hired early in 2016 to investigate email leaks from DNC computers pertaining to the Sanders' campaign which had nothing to do with Trump. After CrowdStrike claimed to have secured the DNC computers from hacking in June 2016 further emails were exfiltrated and delivered to Assange. Those emails were different from the emails first uncovered about the crime against Sanders by the DNC. After Assange informed the DNC of those emails the democrats came out the next day with the claim that Russians colluded with Trump to hack the DNC computers. Never mind that Trump had nothing to do with it and never mind that the emails did not get to Assange by hacking, and never mind that Seth Rich was mysteriously executed just days after the info came out.

Do you want irrefutable facts? Here are some which can be proven beyond doubt:

Here are the facts:

• Seth Rich was a Sanders supporter.
• Early leaked DNC emails showed the DNC was illegally stacking the deck against Sanders in the democrat primary.
• DNC emails removed by a thumb drive or similar device were given to Wikileaks.
• After Assange informed the DNC he had copies of their emails Seth Rich was murdered on the street in DC at night.
• Rich’s house was also ransacked and his computers were stolen.
• The DC police and the FBI claimed they had no idea why Rich was murdered and claimed to know nothing about his computers being stolen.
• Two years later the FBI admitted they had Rich’s computer but claimed they would not turn over information obtained from the computer for 65 years.
• Mueller was hired to investigate the stolen DNC emails, but he never investigated Rich’s connection to the emails even though Assange suggested Rich was the one who gave him copies of the emails.
• When questioned before Congress, CrowdStrike owner claimed they found no evidence the emails were stolen by hacking.
• 10. Scores of forensics investigators claimed evidence proved the emails were not hacked by Russians.

There is nothing new here.
Every post you make is about how corrupt etc the dems are. Nothing else.

I don't care what they did because nothing will come of it. But if you get a warm inner glow from it, knock yourself out.

 

[mark francis]

There is nothing new here.
Every post you make is about how corrupt etc the dems are. Nothing else.

I don't care what they did because nothing will come of it. But if you get a warm inner glow from it, knock yourself out.

Democrats got Trump removed by stealing and lying and now democrats are trashing the US implementing their destructive anti-American, socialist, morally perverted agenda.