CEO Salaries Increase During Recession

OldTrapper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2010
Messages
792
Location
Central Oregon South of Bend
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503983_162-20015340-503983.html

September 1, 2010 2:55 PM
Mass Layoffs Plump CEO Pockets

Two years into the Great Recession, the United States doesn't seem to be doing much better. The majority of Americans are pessimistic about the economy. Housing sales are down. [snip]There is one person, however, who isn't suffering from the effects of the Great Recession: the CEO.

CEO salaries are still running at double the 1990s CEO pay average after inflation adjustment according to the 17th annual executive compensation survey, CEO Pay and the Great Recession by the Institute for Policy Studies. At a time when many laid off Americans are hurting financially, CEOs are reaping the rewards of handing out mass pink slips. Layoffs pay off for CEOs, with the money in saved wages further padding their plump paychecks. CEOs at 50 companies -- "layoff leaders" in the study -- that laid off the most employees took home an average pay of almost $12 million in 2009, 42 percent more than the average CEO pay.

Most firms -- 72 percent -- announced mass layoffs during periods of profit, reflecting a growing trend in corporate America: tightening the workforce to increase profit and maintain high CEO salaries.

Even CEOs who lost their jobs, like Fred Hassan of Schering-Plough, the highest paid layoff leader, received a $33 million golden parachute when his company merged with Merck, while 16,000 employees lost their jobs. Hassan's total 2009 compensation -- $49.6 million -- is enough to provide all 16,000 who were pink slipped average unemployment benefits for more than 10 weeks.

Five of the top 50 layoff leaders owe their high paychecks to the tax payer bailouts that followed the 2008 Wall Street collapse. As the government helped prop their companies up, American Express CEO Kenneth Chenault took home $16.8 million, including a $5 million cash bonus while his company laid off 4,000 employees and received $3.39 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funding.

As Republicans cry that there is no money to extend unemployment benefits for 99ers, perhaps they should put caps on CEO wages. Most startling is that the $598 million compensation of the top 50 CEOs in layoff leader survey could provide average unemployment benefits for 37,759 workers for an entire year -- or nearly a month of benefits for each of the 531,363 employees laid off by those companies.
 
Werbung:
Thats why we all voted for OBAMA! He promised he would raise taxes on people making over $250,000 i got proof he said it.


 
The increases in CEO pay is the Republican/Conservative stimulus plan to spend us out of the recession. Besides, CEO's "earned" that money.
 
Don't know exactly how you can say that in all seriousness when the bailout was instituted by liberal Democrats, and RINO's like Bush.

name one Republican, who would if i the white house would have not bailed the banks out and let the system fail...Not named Ron Paul.....

All the Republicans did was hide behind others voting for it so they could attack it later..but knew it had to be done.

And its funny how So many RINO's are, leaders of the Republicans....Its like its not even a real party...Since any time any Republican does anything someone on the right does not agree with, they just yell Rino so they can keep blaming the left.
 
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503983_162-20015340-503983.html

September 1, 2010 2:55 PM
Mass Layoffs Plump CEO Pockets

Two years into the Great Recession, the United States doesn't seem to be doing much better. The majority of Americans are pessimistic about the economy. Housing sales are down. [snip]There is one person, however, who isn't suffering from the effects of the Great Recession: the CEO.

CEO salaries are still running at double the 1990s CEO pay average after inflation adjustment according to the 17th annual executive compensation survey, CEO Pay and the Great Recession by the Institute for Policy Studies. At a time when many laid off Americans are hurting financially, CEOs are reaping the rewards of handing out mass pink slips. Layoffs pay off for CEOs, with the money in saved wages further padding their plump paychecks. CEOs at 50 companies -- "layoff leaders" in the study -- that laid off the most employees took home an average pay of almost $12 million in 2009, 42 percent more than the average CEO pay.

Most firms -- 72 percent -- announced mass layoffs during periods of profit, reflecting a growing trend in corporate America: tightening the workforce to increase profit and maintain high CEO salaries.

Even CEOs who lost their jobs, like Fred Hassan of Schering-Plough, the highest paid layoff leader, received a $33 million golden parachute when his company merged with Merck, while 16,000 employees lost their jobs. Hassan's total 2009 compensation -- $49.6 million -- is enough to provide all 16,000 who were pink slipped average unemployment benefits for more than 10 weeks.

Five of the top 50 layoff leaders owe their high paychecks to the tax payer bailouts that followed the 2008 Wall Street collapse. As the government helped prop their companies up, American Express CEO Kenneth Chenault took home $16.8 million, including a $5 million cash bonus while his company laid off 4,000 employees and received $3.39 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funding.

As Republicans cry that there is no money to extend unemployment benefits for 99ers, perhaps they should put caps on CEO wages. Most startling is that the $598 million compensation of the top 50 CEOs in layoff leader survey could provide average unemployment benefits for 37,759 workers for an entire year -- or nearly a month of benefits for each of the 531,363 employees laid off by those companies.

There is no need to "cap" wages in a free market system. The market pays CEO's what the market will bear.

If we are going to start capping wages, how about we start with union jobs?

I see no problem with a CEO earning what the market will bear to pay him. After all, his job is far more important than someone on the assembly line (for example).
 
I see no problem with a CEO earning what the market will bear to pay him. After all, his job is far more important than someone on the assembly line (for example).

Not in a free market capitalism system, only in a corporate socialist system.

In fact, even Jefferson supported the taxing of the rich, and only the rich, to pay for the debts of government, and to care for the poor.

Then too, it is not the market that determines the salaries of the CEO.
 
Even now if Obama wanted to Tax the Rich. Republican Congress won let him. When Republiocans promise to cut taxes they only cut em for the Rich. When Democrats promise to raise taxes they rasise them on everyone.
 
Even now if Obama wanted to Tax the Rich. Republican Congress won let him. When Republiocans promise to cut taxes they only cut em for the Rich. When Democrats promise to raise taxes they rasise them on everyone.


Doesn't matter if you raise them or not. They still won't pay them.

Corporations like Google only pay 22.5% with the rate of 35% corporate tax now on the books. People like Kerry only pay 17% when the rate is now 38%.

One should go to Forbes.com and check out the wealth of the billionaires for the past two years, and see how their wealth has increased. Slim in Mexico City gained 13 billion, as did Bill Gates. Buffet gained 11 billion. Soros only gained 3 billion. And that was just from 2009, to 2010.

So, who is this recession hurting?
 
The problem is that money begets money, and power begets power. When you get to the figures that apply to CEO salaries, you're no longer talking about day to day living expenses or even lavish vacations, but about power, and the more money/power someone has, the more money/power they are able to grab.

It's patently absurd to say that the CEO of a failed company "earned" his lavish bonus, and equally absurd to pay the CEO according to how many ordinary jobs were eliminated by his policies. It's all about how much the top guy can grab, and that takes power.

Don't look to government to solve this problem, as it is a part of the problem. The powerful will use government to increase their power, and the people's representatives will dance to their tune or find themselves out of power.
 
While the government steals Americans of all their liberties and economic freedom, some Americans are foolishly debating CEO pay.

PS Dudes - Its nothing more than a smoke screen to distract your attention while your pocket, your kids pockets, and your grandkids pockets get picked by government.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top