Lies told by Georgia officials covering up the fact of tens of thousands of fraudulent 2020 votes are now exposed

mark francis said:
Democrats fought to keep law enforcement officials from investigating evidence of fraud which is clearly corrupt and supports the conclusion that Democrats did not want the evidence of the crimes investigated because they knew what law enforcement investigators would find.
Click to expand...
Clearly corrupt? Who was arrested, legal moron? Lol
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Democrats fought to keep law enforcement officials from investigating evidence of fraud which is clearly corrupt and supports the conclusion that Democrats did not want the evidence of the crimes investigated because they knew what law enforcement investigators would find.
Click to expand...
No they didn't. The electoral staff followed the rules. With authority to inspect them is illegal. You lost. Suck eggs.
 
pjmret said:
World tribune? Lolololololololplplpl

Who was arrested based on the report? No one? Lololololol

God you say the dumbest things lol
Click to expand...
If you want to mock those sources Democrats do not approve of you should also try disproving the facts given in the reports, which others before you have miserably failed to do.
 
Boris Norris said:
No they didn't. The electoral staff followed the rules. With authority to inspect them is illegal. You lost. Suck eggs.
Click to expand...
The electoral staff who honestly investigated election fraud in their precincts were charged with breaking laws leftists had enacted and twisted to prevent investigations into voting fraud.
 
mark francis said:
The electoral staff who honestly investigated election fraud in their precincts were charged with breaking laws leftists had enacted and twisted to prevent investigations into voting fraud.
Click to expand...
Where was it proven democrats broke the laws?
When and where did democrats refuse to allow appropriate investigators to do their work?
Proper investigators are not police or disgruntled republican nut cases believing Trump's bullshyt.
 
Boris Norris said:
Where was it proven democrats broke the laws?
When and where did democrats refuse to allow appropriate investigators to do their work?
Proper investigators are not police or disgruntled republican nut cases believing Trump's bullshyt.
Click to expand...
Democrats block voting fraud investigations and then put on a show of Innocence declaring, 'We didn't do nothing wrong.'

Pa. Gov. Wolf, manufacturers want to keep Republican election investigation away from voting machines - pennlive.com 12-18-21
  1. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTIONS
Pa. Gov. Wolf, manufacturers want to keep Republican election investigation away from voting machines

  • Published: Dec. 18, 2021, 10:48 a.m.
By
Marc Levy | The Associated Press
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration and a voting-system manufacturer are trying to prevent Republican lawmakers from expanding what they call a “forensic investigation” of Pennsylvania’s 2020 election to a new front, inspecting voting machines.
 
mark francis said:
If you want to mock those sources Democrats do not approve of you should also try disproving the facts given in the reports, which others before you have miserably failed to do.
Click to expand...
it has nothing to do with democratic approval, and everything to do with credibility. lol.

you post all these "reports" of fraud and yet no one is ever arrested on their basis..because they aren't credible. duh.
 
Boris Norris said:
You haven't proved them or any democrats to be crooks over the 2020 election fraud.
Click to expand...

Q&A – Successfully Prosecuted Voter Fraud From 2020 Election Cycle | 1290 WJNO | The Brian Mudd Show (iheart.com) 6-22-22

Q&A – Successfully Prosecuted Voter Fraud From 2020 Election Cycle

ByBrian Mudd Jun 22, 2022

Q&A of the Day – Successfully Prosecuted Voter Fraud From 2020 Election Cycle

Each day I feature a listener question sent by one of these methods.

Email: brianmudd@iheartmedia.com

Gettr, Parler & Twitter: @brianmuddradio

iHeartRadio: Use the Talkback feature – the microphone button on our station’s page in the iHeart app.

Today’s entry: Talkback & Heard you say there have been 50+ voter fraud cases prosecuted from 2020. Never have heard about those (surprise). Where were they?

Bottom Line: Yes, you’re right. As part of my breakdown of 2000 Mules last week, I said this: Voter fraud is real. It is a concern. There are 53 criminal convictions for voter fraud which have resulted from the 2020 election cycle. Additionally, we have cases like the 156 referred but unpursued in Florida. We need to get to the bottom of them. In Florida, that should soon start to happen. As of July 1st, Florida’s new election integrity law will be in force with a newly created state enforcement division which will be able to investigate those alleged voter fraud cases unpursued by local prosecutors. As for the 53 criminal convictions for voter fraud since the 2020 Election cycle began – here's where they’ve occurred:

  • 14: California
  • 5: Arizona
  • 4: Florida, Pennsylvania, Texas
  • 3: Michigan, New Hampshire, West Virginia
  • 2: Virginia, New Jersey, New Mexico
  • 1: Colorado, Kansas, Mississippi, Nevada, Ohio, Louisiana, Wisconsin
53 criminal convictions for voter fraud across 18 states. You’ll notice that far and away California leads the way with evidenced voter fraud. At the same time, you’ll notice a slew of swing states, including Florida, among the next states down. Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Texas, Michigan, New Hampshire – all key 2020 swing states. In fact, 11 of the 18 states with voter fraud convictions since 2020 are swing states. So yeah, voter fraud is real, and it is pervasive. It also typically takes a while for these cases to be brought and successfully prosecuted. Fifteen of the voter fraud convictions have happened thus far this year. And there almost certainly will be more. This is why it's important to focus on combating provable fraud as opposed to unproven speculation. When so much attention is paid to what can’t or at least hasn’t been proven – it takes away from the reality of what has been and allows mainstream news media and their allies on the left to shift focus away from evidenced voter fraud. And as for the type of evidenced voter fraud committed since the onset of the 2020 cycle:

  • 19: Absentee Ballot Fraud
  • 8 (each): Ballot Petition Fraud & Duplicate voting
  • 6 (each): False Registrations & Ineligible Voting
  • 4: Impersonation
  • 1 (each) Illegal “Assistance” at Polls & Altered vote count (by an election official)
Far and away absentee, or vote-by-mail ballots were the top choice for evidenced voter fraud. This lends credence to the reforms made to tighten up security and drop box locations in states like Florida, Georgia and Arizona. But all told eight different types of voter fraud have been evidenced and successfully prosecuted – right down to having to be concerned with a possible inside job within an election office. And while there hasn’t been anywhere near the level of legally evidenced fraud sufficient to overturn the 2020 Presidential election results, there have been two local election results which changed as a result of identified illegal voting – one of which was in Florida, with the other in Mississippi.

While I know my breakdown of 2000 Mules wasn’t what some wanted to hear – there's enough here that’s worth focusing on and addressing, without revisiting what’s already been investigated and cleared by officials, even if suspicious. The better news is that 19 states have passed election integrity laws since the 2020 election cycle – including several where criminal convictions for voter fraud took place and were in the crosshairs of presidential election outcomes – Arizona and Georgia. That’s what’s most important here. Prosecute what can be proven and enhance election integrity growing forward based on what we’ve learned.
 
mark francis said:
Why do you assume crooks are not crooks and the crimes they commit were not committed if they escape arrest?
Click to expand...

i assume you morons are morons and have no idea what you are talking about because all your claims of fraud turn out not to be credible, which is why no one gets arrested on the basis of your claims.
 
pjmret said:
it has nothing to do with democratic approval, and everything to do with credibility. lol.

you post all these "reports" of fraud and yet no one is ever arrested on their basis..because they aren't credible. duh.
Click to expand...
There are dozens of sworn affidavits from eyewitnesses to 2020 election fraud that Democrats ignore, dismiss, and continue to lie about..
 
pjmret said:
i assume you morons are morons and have no idea what you are talking about because all your claims of fraud turn out not to be credible, which is why no one gets arrested on the basis of your claims.
Click to expand...
Of course Democrat election fraudsters will claim the evidence against them is not credible in spite of the massive evidence of fraud they cannot refute. Don't be fooled by lying crooks trying to fool people to hide their crimes.
 
mark francis said:
There are dozens of sworn affidavits from eyewitnesses to 2020 election fraud that Democrats ignore, dismiss, and continue to lie about..
Click to expand...

sworn affidavits prove nothing, legal moron...without credible proof. duh.

the fact that someone thinks someone did something wrong proves nothing by itself.
god you are a legal moron. lol
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Of course Democrat election fraudsters will claim the evidence against them is not credible in spite of the massive evidence of fraud they cannot refute. Don't be fooled by lying crooks trying to fool people to hide their crimes.
Click to expand...
no, i claim it isnt credible because you lost every court case.
you morons are 100% losers lol
 

Similar threads

M
    • Like
Irrefutable evidence of officials' deliberate coverups of Dominion vulnerabilities to voting fraud
3 4 5
Replies
66
Views
840
Boris Norris
B
Back
Top