Why bring war to Libya?

K

katsung47

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
411
How could people of backward country under a dictator live a better life than “democratic Western”? Is that why they activate the war in Libya? Or just for its oil?

Life in Libya:

• GDP per capita - $ 14,192.
• for each family member in the state pays $ 1,000 a year subsidy.
• Unemployment - 730 $.
• Salary Nurse - $ 1,000.
• For every newborn is paid $ 7,000.
• Suite as a gift $ 64,000 to buy an apartment.
• The discovery of personal business one-time financial assistance - $ 20,000.
• Major taxes and levies prohibited.
• Education and medicine are free.
• Education and Internships abroad - at government expense.
• Chain stores for large families with symbolic prices of basic foodstuffs.
• For the sale of products past their expiry date - large fines and detention units spetspolitsii.
• Some pharmacies - with free dispensing.
• counterfeiting of medicines - the death penalty.
• rents - is absent.
• Pay for electricity for the population is missing.
• Sales and use of alcohol is prohibited - "prohibition".
• Loans for buying a car and an apartment - no interest.
• Real estate services are prohibited.
• Buying a car up to 50% paid by the state militia fighters - 65%.
• Gasoline is cheaper than water. 1 liter of gasoline - $ 0.14.

http://www.******************/latest-world-news/177957-living-libya-under-gaddafi.html
Click to expand...
 
Werbung:
Hate to break this to you, HopSing, but the United States doesn't import oil from Libya.

Another conspiracy theory bites the dust.
 
TruthSeeker said:
Hate to break this to you, HopSing, but the United States doesn't import oil from Libya.

Another conspiracy theory bites the dust.
Click to expand...

It doesn't prevent US to trade the oil interest of Libya for US' own interest Here is my article posted in other thread, I post it here:

Libya oil interest (4/11/2011) (644)

Though the media use to cover up the war the Western powers activated with beautiful words such like “humanity”, “protect people”, “democracy” , there is always dirty deals behind the scenes. Three years ago, I wrote “541. Eiffel Tower bombing had been planned for Iran war (2/28/08)” and “542. Terror attack, prophecy and payment (3/4/08) “. I said, “What will Sarcozy get for the secret deal of Eiffel Tower bombing and Iran war? Here is one of the payments.

Quote:

"US lawmakers blast Boeing defense contract snub
Mar 1 (2008)

US lawmakers have reacted angrily after the US military awarded a 35-billion-dollar aircraft deal to Europe's Northrop Grumman/EADS group, in a major blow to US manufacturers Boeing.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1 “
There is an abrupt turn after three years.

Quote:

Pentagon Awards Boeing Tanker Contract Worth $35 Billion
Decision Follows Decade of Wrangling; EADS, Alabama Lose Out; 50,000 Jobs in Washington, Kansas
Feb. 24, 2011

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/penta...ry?id=12992086
The background of this abrupt change was: “Libya unrest: Air strike on protesters in Tripoli”, “ Libya unrest: Gaddafi forces violently quell Tripoli protest” which took place in mid-February. When US found a chance (likely created by CIA) to keep the profitable tanker contract for itself, they change the deal. The military contract was replaced by Libya oil interest. I wrote” Libya deal”,

Re: “3/25/2011

It should have been a secret deal among US, Great Britain and France.

Libya's oil interest has been sold to head countries of the NATO to exchange their support of Iran war. That's why France is so active to bomb Libya. War on Iran needs justification - a 911 alike terror attack. Britain and France would allow such false flag "terror attack" taking place in their territory. That possibly would be a dirty bomb attack.

Watch for the coming “terror attack” on Eiffle Tower, though in the name of “Islamic extremists”, actually from the puppets of western intelligence.”

I always revealed the plots of the Feds in advance. They tried their best to discredit my prediction. This time there is another abrupt turn in Libya deal. In early April, the news were: “Gadhafi troops recapture oil town” (A.P. 3/31); “Libya rebel leader says NATO falls short in mission”(A.P. 4/6); “Apparent NATO strike hits rebel convoy in Libya” (A.P. 4/8); “More Libyan rebels slain by NATO attacks” (4/9 Los Angeles Times) When Gadhafi's army is heavily damaged by NATO’s air attack, how could it become such a condition?

A news on 4/8 solved my puzzle. The article in Chinese newspapers asked, “Official merchant? Merchant official? Chief Director assigned Governor of Province” (Watch China, 4/8). It says that the Chief Director of the Board of China Petro-Chemistry – Su Shu Ling, is assigned by Beijing to be a member of the committee of Communist Party of Fujian as well as the Vice Governor of FujiJan Province. Su still keeps his post as Chief Director of the Board of China Petro-Chemistry. Chinese web sites criticize, “ After all is he an official, or a merchant?”. “How could it be possible? Like Bill Gates to be assigned Mayor of Los Angles appointed by Washington”.

The unusual appointment in China on 4/2 indicates the Libya oil interest now is the payment to China. Chinese oil company is the interest receiver. New post in Fujian is not a coincidence. Eight years ago, I said it is the original place the Feds and their Chinese counterpart frame the drug case. (see “ 142. Drug case in Fujian” and “143. Drug case in Fujian (continuation)(7/10)” ) Not every one willing to commit a crime to frame a drug case and to kill a lot of innocent people. So they played such a show. The oil interest is linked to the framed drug case and Su is given all the high ranking power to commit the crime.

The change of new deal is swift, abrupt and very effective. It means there will be big case in April and May when the Patriot Act ends. (Possible starting date is around 4/17.) There will be “terror attack” in US, G.B. and France to justify war on Iran.
Click to expand...
 
pocketfullofshells said:
soo in your mind the US should have let them Slaughter the people right?

And how do we get oil from them by helping there own people remove a dictator but not putting our troops on there soil...If we wanted the oil that bad we could just get it from them before.
Click to expand...

Most likely, it's US' assets provoked the riot. People rarely know the covert work US did.

FBI informant identified as in charge of Mumbai terrorist attacks

another FBI informant named Headley identified as mastermind behind Mumbai Terror event. Sound familiar?

FBI knew Headley had LeT links in 2005
Yashwant Raj, Hindustan Times
Washington, October 16, 2010

Federal investigators in the US had known of David Coleman Headley's training trips to Pakistan at least three years before the November 26 attacks in Mumbai on targets identified and receed by him. This information has not yet been shared by US investigators with India, which has been granted access to Headley and information given by him about the Mumbai attacks in which 166 people were killed. Specific information about Headley's trips were passed on to the Federal Bureau of Investigations by Headley's wife during investigations into her complaint of domestic violence against him in 2005.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/FBI-knew-Headley-had-LeT-links-in-2005/Article1-613662.aspx
Click to expand...

and this:

Raymond Davis was a Taliban recruiter: Report
February 22, 2011 16:49 IST

American official Raymond Davis, arrested for double murder, had "close links" with Taliban and was "instrumental" in recruiting youths for it, the media in Pakistan claimed on Tuesday, close on the heels of reports in the United States that he was a Central Intelligence Agency agent tracking movements of terror groups like the Lashkar-e-Tayiba.

The "close ties" of 37-year-old Davis, arrested in Lahore on January 27 for killing two men he claimed were trying to rob him, with the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan came out during investigations, The Express Tribune reported quoting an unnamed senior official of the Punjab police.

"Davis was instrumental in recruiting young people from Punjab for the Taliban to fuel the bloody insurgency in Pakistan," the official said.

http://www.rediff.com/news/report/raymond-davis-was-a-taliban-recruiter-says-report/20110222.htm
Click to expand...
 
Dr.Who said:
The US should let them slaughter each other only until it becomes the world's police force. How much will they pay us to be the police?
Click to expand...

yes we should always act like if someone does not directly attack us it does not effect us.

But yea it would be horrible if the US helped the UN, got rid of a terrorist leader of a nation who has attacked and killed americans, had a chance at a some form of democracy and freedom in a nation with lots of oil, and showed again that the US actuly is supporting rights of the people in the middle east and north africa....over supporting dicators who kill there own and torture them....showing that there is a better way to push for change...and its not Al Quida.

you know all that stuff Bush talked about when we invaded Iraq and lost over 4000 troops and trillions in spending...while Republicans cheered it on and attacked any liberal who even suggested it may not be a smart idea...

here I can make it better for you...They have a secret WMD Program...I swear when the leadership falls we will show you it ....trust me....look here is a known forged document and some intel on tubes we know already to be wrong...see WMD...does that make it better?
 
Werbung:
pocketfullofshells said:
of course real Lybians don't like peace demcracy rights or anything like that.....so it must be the US did it...and got half there nation on the CIA payroll to join them...its just so logical!
Click to expand...

I can imagine what kind of peace democracy you bring to them. Another puppet dictator under Western protect. Anyway, Iraq is a model.

Iraq: Worse for Christians Now Than under Saddam Hussein
• Michael Ireland, Chief Correspondent, ASSIST News Service
• Tuesday, July 01, 2008

July 2, 2008

BAGHDAD (ANS) -- The Reverend Canon Andrew White, affectionately known as The Vicar of Baghdad, says the situation for Christians in Iraq is "clearly worse" than under the Saddam Hussein regime, toppled by US and Coalition forces in 2003.

In a segment of the CBS news program 60 Minutes, originally broadcast on Dec. 2, 2007, updated June 26 and aired on June 29, 2008, correspondent Scott Pelley asked Canon White: "You were here during Saddam’s reign. And now after. Which was better? Which was worse?"

"The situation now is clearly worse” than under Saddam, White replied.

"There’s no comparison between Iraq now and then," he told Pelley. "Things are the most difficult they have ever been for Christians. Probably ever in history. They’ve never known it like now."

http://www.crosswalk.com/news/relig...s-now-than-under-saddam-hussein-11578523.html
Click to expand...
 
Back
Top