Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
It seems I'm not the only one who is seeing the choreographed nature of terrorist strikes..and the "non-state actors" who resort to violence to sway the political tide in their favor..by any means..The main thing when terrorism seems choreographed is to look at who stood to gain what and who stood to lose what in the doing of those attacks. In the case of the "seemingly related string of bombings" [Reuters] in Baghdad the day before Obama landed there, it makes no sense whatsoever from Al Qaida's standpoint to smack Obama in the face on the eve of finally getting what they're after [troop withdrawel] from the very man who would give that to them. It does, however, make perfect sense that Dick Cheney's recent pleas to keep troops there and to make it seem like an imminent need, to suspect him first, via his still-existing ties to the CIA, as the main culprit behind those strikes. Further supporting that second theory is the fact that there was an obvious intelligence glitch that allowed the "terrorists" precognition of Obama's unannounced visit there.It stinks to high heaven of Dick and not at all of Al Qaida...or maybe it does of both? That's why I titled this thread "Who is Al Qaida Really?"
It seems I'm not the only one who is seeing the choreographed nature of terrorist strikes..and the "non-state actors" who resort to violence to sway the political tide in their favor..by any means..
The main thing when terrorism seems choreographed is to look at who stood to gain what and who stood to lose what in the doing of those attacks. In the case of the "seemingly related string of bombings" [Reuters] in Baghdad the day before Obama landed there, it makes no sense whatsoever from Al Qaida's standpoint to smack Obama in the face on the eve of finally getting what they're after [troop withdrawel] from the very man who would give that to them. It does, however, make perfect sense that Dick Cheney's recent pleas to keep troops there and to make it seem like an imminent need, to suspect him first, via his still-existing ties to the CIA, as the main culprit behind those strikes. Further supporting that second theory is the fact that there was an obvious intelligence glitch that allowed the "terrorists" precognition of Obama's unannounced visit there.
It stinks to high heaven of Dick and not at all of Al Qaida...or maybe it does of both? That's why I titled this thread "Who is Al Qaida Really?"
