I'm going to bring your ad hominems up to the moderators here if it doesn't stop.
You are allowed to address my points, not me as a person.
Clear?
No, no I'm not. I'm paying attention to this line from Reuter's:
Apparently the day before he touched down in Baghdad, a string of "seemingly coordinated bombings" happened.
Not my words, the words of Reuters... And as I said, I tend to believe them given the command-performance of Osama Bin Laden when Cheneyco wanted sympathy for Israel's assault on Hamas last Christmas.
Bin Laden isn't a drooling *****. He had to know coming out for Hamas would spur public sentiments pro-Israel and therefore make life worse for Palestinian arabs especially in that just before he came out, american public sentiments were becoming critical of Israel..! (a funny coincidence with many "terrorist" strikes) So I conclude that his coming out at that juncture was either:
1. Because he actually supports Israel and/or hates Hamas or
2. Because he is an actor in a play written by others in support of Israel (or rather, what Israel represents strategically..).
(or both 1 and 2)
Do the math. Others have..
Oh, and while you've got the calculator out, don't forget to multiply the sum by the "Bush has financial ties to the Bin Laden's" factor..
