Once again, you ignore the fact the bombings were going on even before Obama got in office.
You still haven't shown any evidence it was Al Qaeda yet. Even if you did show, you still can't make a connection between Obama's visit and the bombings.
Your entire theory is like a patchwork puzzle of random thoughts. I have honestly wondered if you are like John Forbes Nash. Because it seems clear you are intelligent, but like Nash, you seem to have a paranoid schizophrenia going on. Specifically you remind me of Nash as portrayed in the movie, A beautiful mind. In the flick, he picks out of the newspaper, words, letters, numbers and dates, and patch them together into a completely imagined code, and forms the whole thing into a screwy reality that he really just made up. This is exactly what you do here.
I could use the same logic to claim that Democrats in 2005 or 2006, helped the Chinese to supply weapons to terrorist groups in Iraq, in order to cause the violence of 2007 to support their claims Bush was screwing up in Iraq. Clearly China wanted the oil contracts, and Democrats wanted a political football to beat Bush over. Of course terrorist groups are happy just killing the infidels. It all makes perfect sense. China was whining about the no bid contracts. Democrats were pissed that Bush had huge favor with the public over the success in Iraq at the time. Of course we all read about how the democrats pressured Iraq to not sign the no-bid contracts. Which obviously made China happy. So what did they do to return the favor to the Democrats? Maybe support the terrorist factions which flared up in 2007?
Yes yes, of course! It all makes sense now!
