Yes Lagboltz, do get that link for us. If I spouted something to the opposite, I'd be required by much whining and ad hominems (that continue) to provide a source or be called a liar. We are operating under supposed conditions of equality...so...yeah, get that link.
Meanwhile:
No, not necessarily. You see, people can think differently within the same gender. There is no "set way" people's brains operate. Furthermore, you cannot automatically write off environmental influences as that brain was in its formative stage, learning to be wired a certain way by reacting to its environment (remember: young primate brains are the most pliable of all mammals).
Sooo... we're right back to where we started with the environment vs genetic argument. If babies sit and absorb everything they see, learning socially and wiring their brains according to their envirnoments (which is what primates are paramount at doing), then if they're witnessing homosexual "normalcy" within the larger society from birth on, we can, most definitely, as with the cultural phenomenon in San Francisco, expect a significant rise in the population of homosexuality once it becomes mainstream via marriage.
Much lies in evidence towards environmental homosexuality. Very little if any lies in genetic. If you insist, I will cite studies on occurances of adult homosexuality in children molested by same-gender adults...but please, don't make me do this again. It's such a depressing statistic..just like the one that supports heterosexual promiscuity (as with many prostitutes and sex addicts) who were molested by opposite gender adults when they were kids..
