What democrats forget about history

the annoying thing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Messages
18,322
Location
Florida


Yes they forget the USA has porched land many times from other nations so its not such a silly thing to think owe could buy Greenland .

but again, I have talked to a fe libs about history, so I'm not surprised they don't know.
 
Werbung:
The US bought the Virgin Islands from Denmark in 1917 to protect trade going through the Panama Canal. They became an unincorprated territory in 1927. Denmark is not going to sell Greenland to the US, nrithe the Danes nor the Greenlanders want to see this.

I think that US history is far more well known among liberals than MAGAclowns. Trump is supremely ignorant of US history, world history and nearly everything else.
 
The US bought the Virgin Islands from Denmark in 1917 to protect trade going through the Panama Canal. They became an unincorprated territory in 1927. Denmark is not going to sell Greenland to the US, nrithe the Danes nor the Greenlanders want to see this.

I think that US history is far more well known among liberals than MAGAclowns. Trump is supremely ignorant of US history, world history and nearly everything else.
Yes like your claim its to cold in dec to graze sheep in Bethlehem. or many of the other things you talk about that I keep proving wrong talk about babbling .Your knowledge compared to mine is pathic .
 
There are dozens of detailed blogs on YouTube describing the story of Jesus ' birth. You could actually learn something if you were not so utterly aggressively ignorant.
 
yes-excited.gif

Yes they forget the USA has porched land many times from other nations so its not such a silly thing to think owe could buy Greenland .

but again, I have talked to a fe libs about history, so I'm not surprised they don't know.
.
spellingbookla-458x458_grande.jpg

.
 
There are dozens of detailed blogs on YouTube describing the story of Jesus ' birth. You could actually learn something if you were not so utterly aggressively ignorant.
No, that is a lie. There are only the three gospels written by Matthew, Mark,Luke and John and they contradict one another. All were written around 40 years after the crucifixion, and no one knows who the authors actually were. The apostle Paul never met Jesus, a and has nothing to say about the Virgin Birth.

Matthew claims that after the time of the crucifixion, dead people popped of of their graves and began to stroll through Jerusalem. Luke, Mark and John do not claim that this happened. They do not mention it at all. And neither does Paul.

I suggest that when zombie corpses stroll about, this is not something that people ignore.

You seem to "know" only what small children learn in Vacation Bible School. Check out what Bart Ehrman has to say about Jesus in his YouTube discussions
 
.
"No television preacher has ever read the Bible. Neither has any evangelical politician. Neither has the pope. Neither have I. And neither have you. At best, we've all read a bad translation - a translation of translations of translations of hand-copied copies of copies of copies of copies, and on and on, hundreds of times."
.
9583-9db427c85dc6de0fd4415c90c5dd57e7.jpg

.
"DUDE!! CHECK IT OUT!!!! I put a talking-snake in this one!!!"

.
 
.
View attachment 18515
.

Yeah....that's really important.
.
.
"Since World War II, the United States economy has performed significantly better on average under the administration of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents."
.
"No television preacher has ever read the Bible. Neither has any evangelical politician. Neither has the pope. Neither have I. And neither have you. At best, we've all read a bad translation - a translation of translations of translations of hand-copied copies of copies of copies of copies, and on and on, hundreds of times."
.
9583-9db427c85dc6de0fd4415c90c5dd57e7.jpg

.
"DUDE!! CHECK IT OUT!!!! I put a talking-snake in this one!!!"

.
Most of us have been reading it at some time in our lives , the translation is not the real reason you've not been able chicken choker.

The real reasonis it has not all been translated becaus e michbof it has not been found or is gone forever,
 
The translations of the Bible are for the most part accurate, but of course, God is not presented equally by the Gospels and the writings of Paul. There is a huge abundance of Christians writings that were not accepted as canon by the Church officials. Paul was definitely anti-woman, but Jesus was the opposite. The fact is that if you translate gobbledegook from Greek, Latin or whatever into English, you end up with English gobbledegook.
 
The translations of the Bible are for the most part accurate, but of course, God is not presented equally by the Gospels and the writings of Paul. There is a huge abundance of Christians writings that were not accepted as canon by the Church officials. Paul was definitely anti-woman, but Jesus was the opposite. The fact is that if you translate gobbledegook from Greek, Latin or whatever into English, you end up with English gobbledegook.
i am 100 percent know all of that . Hell they just translated the Zodiac letters .
And in ancient times they also had slang and words with meaning we may never know,

For instance, if I said Chop that's a Narely shiner you got there bro. many would not know enen today.
 
i am 100 percent know all of that . Hell they just translated the Zodiac letters .
And in ancient times they also had slang and words with meaning we may never know,

For instance, if I said Chop that's a Narely shiner you got there bro. many would not know enen today.
So what? Are you claiming that the Bible was written in slang?
 
Werbung:
Back
Top