Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
No, I have not. If I had my report would be anecdotal. Not worthless but highly subjective.Are you rebutting my statement that our equipment works better? That was actually a quote from a medical journal. And I did not say that France does not have all the equipment I quoted that our better rates of recover are due in part to better equipment.Are you attempting to show that we do not have better recovery rates because we have a higher rate of contracting infections in he hospital? Contracting an infection is not the same as recovering from an infection. What would count as a rebuttal is if we died at a higher rate as a result of these infections. Just getting the infections could be the result of many things. And since the infection rate in France varies so widely from year to year we should expect that these infections are not the fault of doctors (unless we want to say that the quality of doctors goes up and down from year to year).P.S. making some words blue and calling it a link is not actually a link. But don't worry I was able to google the text. The article does not state anywhere that the U.S. does not cure disease better than France. It gives some inconsistant information about infections caught in hospitals.They actually offer professional training and only let doctors practice homeopathy which is no better than quackery. (homeopathy uses "medicine" that has virtually no active ingredient and is only found to be effective in Meta-analysis which is the statistical equivalent of quackery).
No, I have not. If I had my report would be anecdotal. Not worthless but highly subjective.
Are you rebutting my statement that our equipment works better? That was actually a quote from a medical journal. And I did not say that France does not have all the equipment I quoted that our better rates of recover are due in part to better equipment.
Are you attempting to show that we do not have better recovery rates because we have a higher rate of contracting infections in he hospital? Contracting an infection is not the same as recovering from an infection. What would count as a rebuttal is if we died at a higher rate as a result of these infections. Just getting the infections could be the result of many things. And since the infection rate in France varies so widely from year to year we should expect that these infections are not the fault of doctors (unless we want to say that the quality of doctors goes up and down from year to year).
P.S. making some words blue and calling it a link is not actually a link. But don't worry I was able to google the text. The article does not state anywhere that the U.S. does not cure disease better than France. It gives some inconsistant information about infections caught in hospitals.
They actually offer professional training and only let doctors practice homeopathy which is no better than quackery. (homeopathy uses "medicine" that has virtually no active ingredient and is only found to be effective in Meta-analysis which is the statistical equivalent of quackery).
