Reply to thread

Unlike you, I don't claim to be completely unbiased.  As I outlined in a prior post, I think Clinton was a relatively decent president though we must wait for history to really make an accurate assessment.

So when are you going to stop pretending you are unbiased and objective?

So, in other words, you only believe in following some money?  Who paid for all these people to suddenly come forth?  Who paid all their expenses?  You don't find that in the least bit...odd?  Of course not.  Because your bias is set: he is guilty of everything alleged.  Information to the contrary is disregarded.  He may be guilty of somethings - certainly lying under oath but you are so set you even deny there was any sort of witchhunt.

And of course - no one else could possibly be lying

Now go ahead, call me a Clinton apologist for daring to contradict your conspiracy theory.