Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
good postsSome very good posts beginning to appear. Thank you.Re: The original purpose of my post was to determine if there is a point where it is justifiable to take the law into civilian hands.The people involved in the two instances I mentioned were interviewed in a television special. They stated that they felt they had no choice(they were terrified). In effect, they acted at the lowest level of government authority; the village/neighborhood( held meetings) as opposed to the county, state, or federal authorities. The county and state's and federal (FBI got involved) position was that a crime was committed; the people stated there was not. Their position was that innocent death would have almost surely occurred if they had not acted.This position brings another factor to the argument: At what level of government is likely to be more efficient at protecting people's lives?
good posts
Some very good posts beginning to appear. Thank you.
Re: The original purpose of my post was to determine if there is a point where it is justifiable to take the law into civilian hands.
The people involved in the two instances I mentioned were interviewed in a television special. They stated that they felt they had no choice(they were terrified). In effect, they acted at the lowest level of government authority; the village/neighborhood( held meetings) as opposed to the county, state, or federal authorities. The county and state's and federal (FBI got involved) position was that a crime was committed; the people stated there was not. Their position was that innocent death would have almost surely occurred if they had not acted.
This position brings another factor to the argument: At what level of government is likely to be more efficient at protecting people's lives?
