Reply to thread

slippery slope


Admittedly it is.  But historically there were vigilance committees, not just one person.  There are small units of local government (town meetings) that could elect/appoint a vigilance committee instead of a sheriff to act in their behalf.  But, I am not advocating this as a system; just answering your question.


My main point is:  When conventional law enforcement/criminal justice system fails, do the citizens have the moral right to act preemptively in their own defense?


In the two instances I had in mind, that is not what happened.  In the first instance, the shooter(s) had the support of the whole town, including the local minister.  In the second instance, the retired Navy officer had the support of his neighbors and testified at his trial.


Back
Top